05.01.2013 Views

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

Ontario Power Generation's Response to the Joint Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Attachment 1 <strong>to</strong> OPG letter, Albert Sweetnam <strong>to</strong> Dr. Stella Swanson, “Deep Geologic Reposi<strong>to</strong>ry Project for Low and Intermediate Level Waste – Submission of<br />

<strong>Response</strong>s <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Final Sub-set of Package #4 Information Requests”, CD#: 00216-CORR-00531-00143.<br />

IR# EIS Guidelines<br />

Section<br />

Concentration (Bq/m 3 )<br />

1.E-02<br />

1.E-03<br />

1.E-04<br />

1.E-05<br />

1.E-06<br />

1.E-07<br />

1.E-08<br />

1.E-09<br />

1.E-10<br />

1.E-11<br />

Information Request and <strong>Response</strong><br />

Cl-36: 5th Percentile I-129: 5th Percentile<br />

Cl-36: 50th Percentile I-129: 50th Percentile<br />

Cl-36: 95th Percentile I-129: 95th Percentile<br />

1.E-12<br />

100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000<br />

Time (a)<br />

Natural Cl-36 in Surface Water<br />

Natural I-129 in Surface Water<br />

Figure 2: Calculated Well Water Concentrations for Cl-36 and I-129 from Probabilistic<br />

Sensitivity Calculations (NE-PC) Based on <strong>the</strong> Reference Case (Figure 8-55 of <strong>the</strong> PSR)<br />

As noted above, <strong>the</strong> sorption values and solubility limits for contaminants were set deliberately low and high,<br />

respectively. Within <strong>the</strong> uncertainties, <strong>the</strong> sorption values could also be higher and solubility limits lower than assumed.<br />

No specific calculations were made <strong>to</strong> test this potential improvement as <strong>the</strong> dose rates are already low. However, as a<br />

general observation it is noted that sorption, precipitation and solids exchange of C-14 are likely <strong>to</strong> occur <strong>to</strong> some<br />

extent due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> large amount of carbon in <strong>the</strong> reposi<strong>to</strong>ry, shaft seals and host rock. This could appreciably reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

potential dose consequences of some disruptive scenarios such as <strong>the</strong> Severe Shaft Seal Failure Scenario.<br />

(d) Interactions of Contaminants with Organics in Cap Rock<br />

Interactions between contaminants and organic compounds in <strong>the</strong> cap rock are not explicitly considered. However,<br />

many of <strong>the</strong> argillaceous rocks included in <strong>the</strong> review of sorption values in Appendix D of QUINTESSA and GEOFIRMA<br />

(2011) are likely <strong>to</strong> include natural organics and so <strong>the</strong> impact of organics is implicitly included in <strong>the</strong> selected sorption<br />

values. While <strong>the</strong> presence of organics is likely <strong>to</strong> increase sorption due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir large surface area, it is possible that<br />

Page 20 of 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!