05.01.2013 Views

Biofuels in Perspective

Biofuels in Perspective

Biofuels in Perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

162 <strong>Biofuels</strong><br />

due to the presence of K2SO4 which can be used as fertilizer. In general, sodium salts are<br />

cheaper than potassium salts.<br />

Although they are more expensive, NaOMe and KOMe are also used, which have the<br />

advantage of greater safety, easier handl<strong>in</strong>g, better layer separation and purer glycerol<br />

(Markolwitz, 2004).<br />

A typical transesterification reaction us<strong>in</strong>g waste and crude oil with less than 3 % FFA<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves a six times molar excess of alcohol (<strong>in</strong> most cases methanol), 1–1.5 % (weight %)<br />

of catalyst at 20–65 ◦ C for 30–90 m<strong>in</strong>utes under vigorous stirr<strong>in</strong>g. As transesterification is<br />

a reversible reaction, the reaction is carried out <strong>in</strong> two steps, <strong>in</strong> many cases the first step<br />

yields a 75 % conversion <strong>in</strong>to methyl esters.<br />

The glycerol layer which conta<strong>in</strong>s residual alcohol, catalyst and soap is separated and<br />

fresh methanol and catalyst is added.<br />

A two-step procedure gives normally a yield of 95–98 %. In a one-step procedure more<br />

catalyst is used. The reaction can be carried out either <strong>in</strong> a batch or cont<strong>in</strong>uous system.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this procedure, biodiesel is obta<strong>in</strong>ed fulfill<strong>in</strong>g the EU standards.<br />

Several studies have been carried out by various research groups to determ<strong>in</strong>e the ratio<br />

oil/methanol/catalyst <strong>in</strong> order to produce biodiesel (see Section 9.3.2.7).<br />

9.3.2.7 Production of Biodiesel by Acid-Catalysed Interesterification<br />

The efficiency of the alkali-catalysed transesterification of waste oils is decreased <strong>in</strong> the<br />

presence of water and FFA ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the soap – of and/or monoglycerides formation<br />

which is giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to poor separation of the ester and glycerol layers. Especially when the<br />

FFA content is higher than 1.5 %, acid-catalysed transesterification should be considered.<br />

On the other hand acid catalysis is much slower.<br />

Acid catalysis <strong>in</strong>volves the use of strong acids such as sulphuric acid and hydrogen<br />

chloride. The transesterification of vegetable oils us<strong>in</strong>g sulphuric acid has been studied<br />

by Canacki and Van Gerpen (1999). The most economical conditions <strong>in</strong>volve the use of a<br />

molar ratio of 20:1 methanol: oil; 3 % weight of sulphuric acid at 60 ◦ for 48 hours.<br />

The percentage conversion is <strong>in</strong>creased with higher amounts of methanol and catalyst,<br />

and decreased dramatically <strong>in</strong> the presence of water with a conversion of 90 % for 0.5 %<br />

water to 32 % when 3 % water was present. The effect of the presence of FFA is far less<br />

dramatic: a level of 5 % FFA gives a 90 % conversion <strong>in</strong> comparison to a 75 % conversion<br />

at a 20 % FFA content.<br />

A comparison has been made of transesterification with methanol <strong>in</strong> the presence of<br />

KOH and H2SO4 (Nye et al., 1983). The process us<strong>in</strong>g 0.1 % H2SO4 (65 ◦ /40 h) and 0–4 %<br />

KOH (50 ◦ /24 h) gives rise to an ester yield of 79.3 % and 91.9 % for a 3.6:1 methanol:oil<br />

ratio. However, the use of higher alcohols (ethanol-butanol) provided higher yields for the<br />

acid catalysed transesterification.<br />

The reaction k<strong>in</strong>etics of the acid-catalysed transesterification of waste fry<strong>in</strong>g oil <strong>in</strong> excess<br />

of methanol to form FAME has been studied by Zheng et al. (2006). Rate of mix<strong>in</strong>g, feed<br />

composition (molar ratio oil:methanol:acid) and temperature were <strong>in</strong>dependent variables.<br />

There was no significant difference <strong>in</strong> the yield of FAME when the rate of mix<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>in</strong><br />

the turbulent range 100–600 rpm. The oil:methanol:acid molar ratios and the temperature<br />

were the most significant factors affect<strong>in</strong>g ester production. A pseudo-first-order reaction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!