05.01.2013 Views

Biofuels in Perspective

Biofuels in Perspective

Biofuels in Perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 <strong>Biofuels</strong><br />

Table 4.4 Comparison between municipalities with and without sugar and ethanol production <strong>in</strong> state<br />

of São Paulo, 2000<br />

Parameter<br />

Cities with sugarcane<br />

activity<br />

Cities with no<br />

sugarcane activity<br />

Number of municipalities 96 499<br />

Population range (1000) 2.4 − 500 2.4 − 500<br />

Average <strong>in</strong>come (R$ 2000) x 1000 17,193 12,441<br />

Income/habitant (R$ 2000) 1 308.7 ± 72.7 272.7 ± 85.2<br />

Average G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex 2 0.519 0.528<br />

Share of total <strong>in</strong>come of 20 % poorest 1 3.97 % ± 0.84 % 3.61 % ± 1.04 %<br />

Share of households with electricity supply 99,6 % 98,8 %<br />

Human development <strong>in</strong>dex (HDI) 1 0.80 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.03<br />

Notes: 1 Average values ± standard deviation.<br />

2 The G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex is a measure of statistical dispersion and is commonly used as a measure of <strong>in</strong>equality of <strong>in</strong>come<br />

distribution. The <strong>in</strong>dex varies from 0 to 1, be<strong>in</strong>g 0 equivalent to perfectly equality and 1 to a hypothetical situation <strong>in</strong><br />

which just one person has all <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

It can be seen from Table 4.4. that, on average, sugarcane <strong>in</strong>dustry br<strong>in</strong>gs benefits to<br />

the economy <strong>in</strong> cities where sugar and ethanol production occurs. As the analysis is based<br />

on 2000 figures when sugarcane production was lower than now, current results should<br />

be better. Despite better results regard<strong>in</strong>g total <strong>in</strong>come and <strong>in</strong>come per capita, results<br />

presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4.4 also show that wealth distribution is not significantly improved due<br />

to the production of sugar and ethanol, as the G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex is basically the same for both<br />

groups of municipalities. In 2000 the average G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex for Brazil was 0.561 and 0.525<br />

for the state of São Paulo; 33 Brazil has one of the highest G<strong>in</strong>i coefficients <strong>in</strong> the world.<br />

The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of the sugarcane and ethanol production sector is lower compared to<br />

the national average and compared to various other economic sectors. 21<br />

Also from Table 4.4 it can be observed that liv<strong>in</strong>g conditions are slightly better for<br />

the set of municipalities <strong>in</strong> which sugarcane <strong>in</strong>dustry exist, a conclusion based on better<br />

results for the share of households with access to electricity supply and on the Human<br />

Development Index (HDI). As a matter of comparison, it should be noticed that theses<br />

<strong>in</strong>dexes correspond to, respectively, 86.6 % and 0.699 <strong>in</strong> Brazil, and 98.9 % and 0.779 <strong>in</strong><br />

the state of São Paulo.<br />

The production of sugarcane/ethanol is an important source of employment <strong>in</strong> Brazil,<br />

both directly and <strong>in</strong>directly related with the activity. Formal direct jobs were estimated as<br />

about 750 thousand <strong>in</strong> 2002, be<strong>in</strong>g almost 50 % related to sugarcane production. 21 The<br />

current number of total jobs (permanent + temporary) is estimated as 1.3 million, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

about 500,000 <strong>in</strong> the state of São Paulo. As of 2003, employees <strong>in</strong> the formal sector (those<br />

who possess formal work<strong>in</strong>g papers) were 59 %, be<strong>in</strong>g 85 % <strong>in</strong> São Paulo. 21,24 This figure<br />

is significantly larger than the figure for the whole Brazilian economy.<br />

Another important figure to mention is that the average wages received by workers <strong>in</strong><br />

the sugarcane production <strong>in</strong> late 1990s, <strong>in</strong> the state of São Paulo, were 80 % higher than<br />

those received by workers <strong>in</strong>volved with other crops. Workers <strong>in</strong> the sugarcane production<br />

received at that time wages 40–50 % higher than workers <strong>in</strong> the service and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

sector, as long as the comparison is done for people with the same skills. 21 Despite these

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!