Biofuels in Perspective
Biofuels in Perspective
Biofuels in Perspective
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
70 <strong>Biofuels</strong><br />
Table 4.4 Comparison between municipalities with and without sugar and ethanol production <strong>in</strong> state<br />
of São Paulo, 2000<br />
Parameter<br />
Cities with sugarcane<br />
activity<br />
Cities with no<br />
sugarcane activity<br />
Number of municipalities 96 499<br />
Population range (1000) 2.4 − 500 2.4 − 500<br />
Average <strong>in</strong>come (R$ 2000) x 1000 17,193 12,441<br />
Income/habitant (R$ 2000) 1 308.7 ± 72.7 272.7 ± 85.2<br />
Average G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex 2 0.519 0.528<br />
Share of total <strong>in</strong>come of 20 % poorest 1 3.97 % ± 0.84 % 3.61 % ± 1.04 %<br />
Share of households with electricity supply 99,6 % 98,8 %<br />
Human development <strong>in</strong>dex (HDI) 1 0.80 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.03<br />
Notes: 1 Average values ± standard deviation.<br />
2 The G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex is a measure of statistical dispersion and is commonly used as a measure of <strong>in</strong>equality of <strong>in</strong>come<br />
distribution. The <strong>in</strong>dex varies from 0 to 1, be<strong>in</strong>g 0 equivalent to perfectly equality and 1 to a hypothetical situation <strong>in</strong><br />
which just one person has all <strong>in</strong>come.<br />
It can be seen from Table 4.4. that, on average, sugarcane <strong>in</strong>dustry br<strong>in</strong>gs benefits to<br />
the economy <strong>in</strong> cities where sugar and ethanol production occurs. As the analysis is based<br />
on 2000 figures when sugarcane production was lower than now, current results should<br />
be better. Despite better results regard<strong>in</strong>g total <strong>in</strong>come and <strong>in</strong>come per capita, results<br />
presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4.4 also show that wealth distribution is not significantly improved due<br />
to the production of sugar and ethanol, as the G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex is basically the same for both<br />
groups of municipalities. In 2000 the average G<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong>dex for Brazil was 0.561 and 0.525<br />
for the state of São Paulo; 33 Brazil has one of the highest G<strong>in</strong>i coefficients <strong>in</strong> the world.<br />
The G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient of the sugarcane and ethanol production sector is lower compared to<br />
the national average and compared to various other economic sectors. 21<br />
Also from Table 4.4 it can be observed that liv<strong>in</strong>g conditions are slightly better for<br />
the set of municipalities <strong>in</strong> which sugarcane <strong>in</strong>dustry exist, a conclusion based on better<br />
results for the share of households with access to electricity supply and on the Human<br />
Development Index (HDI). As a matter of comparison, it should be noticed that theses<br />
<strong>in</strong>dexes correspond to, respectively, 86.6 % and 0.699 <strong>in</strong> Brazil, and 98.9 % and 0.779 <strong>in</strong><br />
the state of São Paulo.<br />
The production of sugarcane/ethanol is an important source of employment <strong>in</strong> Brazil,<br />
both directly and <strong>in</strong>directly related with the activity. Formal direct jobs were estimated as<br />
about 750 thousand <strong>in</strong> 2002, be<strong>in</strong>g almost 50 % related to sugarcane production. 21 The<br />
current number of total jobs (permanent + temporary) is estimated as 1.3 million, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
about 500,000 <strong>in</strong> the state of São Paulo. As of 2003, employees <strong>in</strong> the formal sector (those<br />
who possess formal work<strong>in</strong>g papers) were 59 %, be<strong>in</strong>g 85 % <strong>in</strong> São Paulo. 21,24 This figure<br />
is significantly larger than the figure for the whole Brazilian economy.<br />
Another important figure to mention is that the average wages received by workers <strong>in</strong><br />
the sugarcane production <strong>in</strong> late 1990s, <strong>in</strong> the state of São Paulo, were 80 % higher than<br />
those received by workers <strong>in</strong>volved with other crops. Workers <strong>in</strong> the sugarcane production<br />
received at that time wages 40–50 % higher than workers <strong>in</strong> the service and <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
sector, as long as the comparison is done for people with the same skills. 21 Despite these