05.01.2013 Views

Biofuels in Perspective

Biofuels in Perspective

Biofuels in Perspective

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bio-Ethanol Development(s) <strong>in</strong> Brazil 67<br />

Table 4.3 GHG emissions dur<strong>in</strong>g the ethanol life cycle (kg CO2 equivalent/m 3 of anhydrous ethanol)<br />

Average values Best practices<br />

Productivity (/t) 84.8 92.3<br />

GHG emissions<br />

Fossil fuels 0.22 0.19<br />

Methane and N2O from trash burn<strong>in</strong>g 0.11 0.10<br />

Soil N2O 0.07 0.07<br />

Total GHG emissions 0.40 0.36<br />

Avoided GHG emissions<br />

Surplus bagasse use 1 0.14 0.25<br />

Ethanol use 2 2.86 2.81<br />

Total avoided emissions 3.00 3.06<br />

Net avoided emissions 2.60 2.70<br />

Notes: 1due to the substitution of surplus bagasse for fuel oil.<br />

2due to the substitution of ethanol for gasol<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Source: [29].<br />

non-fossil sources, such as ethanol. Reduction of GHG emissions from ethanol depend on<br />

many factors, e.g. the raw material and the production conditions. For the production of<br />

ethanol from sugarcane under Brazilian conditions, a study by Macedo et al. 29 shows that<br />

the <strong>in</strong>put/output energy ratio (i.e. the amount of energy generated as ethanol regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the <strong>in</strong>put of fossil fuels) varies from 8.3 to 10.2. The same study shows that the avoided<br />

emissions of GHG for anhydrous ethanol use are 2.6–2.7 kg CO2 equivalent/liter of ethanol.<br />

Table 4.3 summarizes the ma<strong>in</strong> results of this study.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g GHG emissions, the comparison of total emissions of CO2 equivalent <strong>in</strong> a<br />

‘well-to-wheel’ basis (i.e. consider<strong>in</strong>g the life cycle of each fuel) is most accepted. In some<br />

cases emissions from biofuels are as high as that from gasol<strong>in</strong>e, whereas other comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />

of feedstock and conversion processes can reduce ‘well-to-wheel’ CO2 emissions to near<br />

zero (IEA, 2004). There is a general consensus that us<strong>in</strong>g bioethanol produced from<br />

sugarcane, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Brazilian conditions of production, 80–90 % of the GHG<br />

emissions can be reduced <strong>in</strong> respect to the use of gasol<strong>in</strong>e (emissions per km traveled). As<br />

a matter of comparison it should be noticed that the use of ethanol derived from gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

(e.g. wheat) br<strong>in</strong>gs about 30 % reduction of CO2 emissions. 30,31 Ethanol from sugarcane<br />

(consider<strong>in</strong>g Brazilian conditions of production) is the best biofuel alternative concerned<br />

with reduction of GHG emissions.<br />

4.7.2 Impacts on Food Production<br />

As previously mentioned, <strong>in</strong> Brazil sugarcane production occupies about 10 % of the<br />

current planted area and about 2.5 % of the agricultural land available. More specifically,<br />

ethanol production is responsible for just half of this land use, as just 50 % of the sugarcane<br />

is used for ethanol production.<br />

It is estimated that <strong>in</strong> Brazil the area available for the enlargement of the agriculture,<br />

without deforestation, is 110 million hectares. Thus, consider<strong>in</strong>g that ethanol production<br />

is go<strong>in</strong>g to double dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 5–18 years, the required area would be about 3 % of the<br />

land available as far as current overall productivity is considered.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!