Biofuels in Perspective
Biofuels in Perspective
Biofuels in Perspective
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bio-Ethanol Development(s) <strong>in</strong> Brazil 67<br />
Table 4.3 GHG emissions dur<strong>in</strong>g the ethanol life cycle (kg CO2 equivalent/m 3 of anhydrous ethanol)<br />
Average values Best practices<br />
Productivity (/t) 84.8 92.3<br />
GHG emissions<br />
Fossil fuels 0.22 0.19<br />
Methane and N2O from trash burn<strong>in</strong>g 0.11 0.10<br />
Soil N2O 0.07 0.07<br />
Total GHG emissions 0.40 0.36<br />
Avoided GHG emissions<br />
Surplus bagasse use 1 0.14 0.25<br />
Ethanol use 2 2.86 2.81<br />
Total avoided emissions 3.00 3.06<br />
Net avoided emissions 2.60 2.70<br />
Notes: 1due to the substitution of surplus bagasse for fuel oil.<br />
2due to the substitution of ethanol for gasol<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Source: [29].<br />
non-fossil sources, such as ethanol. Reduction of GHG emissions from ethanol depend on<br />
many factors, e.g. the raw material and the production conditions. For the production of<br />
ethanol from sugarcane under Brazilian conditions, a study by Macedo et al. 29 shows that<br />
the <strong>in</strong>put/output energy ratio (i.e. the amount of energy generated as ethanol regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the <strong>in</strong>put of fossil fuels) varies from 8.3 to 10.2. The same study shows that the avoided<br />
emissions of GHG for anhydrous ethanol use are 2.6–2.7 kg CO2 equivalent/liter of ethanol.<br />
Table 4.3 summarizes the ma<strong>in</strong> results of this study.<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g GHG emissions, the comparison of total emissions of CO2 equivalent <strong>in</strong> a<br />
‘well-to-wheel’ basis (i.e. consider<strong>in</strong>g the life cycle of each fuel) is most accepted. In some<br />
cases emissions from biofuels are as high as that from gasol<strong>in</strong>e, whereas other comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
of feedstock and conversion processes can reduce ‘well-to-wheel’ CO2 emissions to near<br />
zero (IEA, 2004). There is a general consensus that us<strong>in</strong>g bioethanol produced from<br />
sugarcane, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Brazilian conditions of production, 80–90 % of the GHG<br />
emissions can be reduced <strong>in</strong> respect to the use of gasol<strong>in</strong>e (emissions per km traveled). As<br />
a matter of comparison it should be noticed that the use of ethanol derived from gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
(e.g. wheat) br<strong>in</strong>gs about 30 % reduction of CO2 emissions. 30,31 Ethanol from sugarcane<br />
(consider<strong>in</strong>g Brazilian conditions of production) is the best biofuel alternative concerned<br />
with reduction of GHG emissions.<br />
4.7.2 Impacts on Food Production<br />
As previously mentioned, <strong>in</strong> Brazil sugarcane production occupies about 10 % of the<br />
current planted area and about 2.5 % of the agricultural land available. More specifically,<br />
ethanol production is responsible for just half of this land use, as just 50 % of the sugarcane<br />
is used for ethanol production.<br />
It is estimated that <strong>in</strong> Brazil the area available for the enlargement of the agriculture,<br />
without deforestation, is 110 million hectares. Thus, consider<strong>in</strong>g that ethanol production<br />
is go<strong>in</strong>g to double dur<strong>in</strong>g the next 5–18 years, the required area would be about 3 % of the<br />
land available as far as current overall productivity is considered.