13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

December 1 1, 1998<br />

Sediment Data, Fall 1998, Holden Mine<br />

Page 2<br />

The following comments refer to ARl's performance in meeting quality control specifications<br />

described in the EPA documents "EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846", January<br />

1995, 'Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", March 1983, and "USEPA Contract<br />

Laboratory Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review', February 1994.<br />

AVS, TOC, and grain size data were evaluated using guidance referenced in methods published in the<br />

following sources: "Determination of Acid Volatile Sulfides and Simultaneously Extractable Metals in<br />

Sediment", EPA, April 1991, PSEP guidelines, and Plumb 1981. Data were also reviewed in reference<br />

to the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) prepared for the Phase Ill Remedial Investigation<br />

referenced in addendum (August 28, 1998) to the Sampling and Analysis Plan.<br />

Metals<br />

The ,report is divided into subsections based on type of analyses performed.<br />

Samples were prepared in the laboratory using EPA Methods 3010, 3050, and 200.8 as<br />

appropriate. Samples were analyzed by ICP (EPA Method. 6010A) and ICP MS (EPA Method 200.8<br />

Modified) methods.<br />

1. Holding Time - Acceptable<br />

2. Tunes (ICP MS analysis only) - Acceptable<br />

3. Initial Calibration - Acceptable<br />

4. Continuing calibration - Acceptable<br />

5. Blanks<br />

Aluminum (21.3 uglL) was detected in the continuing calibration blank (CCB) analyzed prior to<br />

samples STE-SED-101698-4, LUC-SED-101698-2-2, LUC-SED-101698-1-2, LUC-SED-101598-3.5-2,<br />

LUC-SED-101598-3-1A, LUC-SED-101598-1-1, LUC-SED-101598-3-2, LUC-SED-101598-3.5-1,<br />

LUC-SED-101598-3-1 C, and LUC-SED-101598-3-1 B. As the concentration of aluminum in the samples<br />

was several orders of magnitude above the CCB concentration, the data were not affected. Data<br />

qualifiers were not assigned.<br />

Aluminum (7 mglkg) was detected in the method blank associated with the sediment samples in<br />

this sample group. The concentration of aluminum detected, in the samples was greater than 10X the<br />

concentration detected in the method blank. Data were not qualified.<br />

Aluminum (0.03 mg/L) was detected in the method blank associated with samples Rinse<br />

10/1 5/98 and Rinse 10116198. The following metals were detected in the rinsate blanks:<br />

Rinse I011 5/98 Rinse 10/1 6/98<br />

Aluminum 0.17 mg/L Aluminum 0.10 mg/L<br />

Manganese 0.0003 mglL Iron 0.03 mg/L<br />

Zinc 0.203 mg/L Manganese 0.0006 mg/L<br />

Zinc 0.007 mg/L<br />

The aluminum results were qualified as not detected in the rinsate samples due to CCB results.<br />

The concentration of manganese, iron, and zinc in the associated sediment samples were orders of<br />

magnitude higher than the rinsate blanks. The sample data were not affected. Data were not qualified.<br />

DAMES & MOORE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!