13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

did not have health-based MTCA Method A or Method B levels (due to an absence of inhalation toxicity<br />

criteria) which could be used for screening. While these constituent concentrations appear to be elevated,<br />

they are not expected to present an unacceptable risk to receptors via the inhalation route at the<br />

concentrations present, particularly given the short expected exposure period for this area and likely ground<br />

cover in the area.<br />

Tailings<br />

Historical and 1997 tailings samples from tailings piles 1, 2 and 3 were collected and analyzed. The<br />

maximum concentrations observed, regardless of location, were used as the source concentrations for<br />

comparison to the screening criteria based on soil ingestion. The background concentrations used for<br />

screening were statistically derived or obtained from Natural Background Soil Metals Concentrarions in<br />

Wushington State (Ecology, 1994) for the Yakima basin. In addition, for those constituents which did not<br />

have an available area background or Ecology natural background level, background levels for the State of<br />

Washington (Dragun, 1991) are presented for comparison purposes. No constituents are eliminated as lHSs<br />

based on the Dragun ranges, however.<br />

The tailings have been adequately characterized to complete the screening assessment. All results were<br />

assumed to represent near surface conditions on the tailings piles. The results of the screening for this<br />

exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-20. All constituents were eliminated as IHSs based on this<br />

screening.<br />

Particulate Emissions from Tailings<br />

The tailings data were also screened for particulate emissions potential. The results of the particulate<br />

emissions screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-21. All constituents were eliminated<br />

as IHSs based on this screening. Aluminum, copper, lead, molybdenum, selenium, silver, thallium, zinc,<br />

and cyanide did not have health-based MTCA Method A or Method B levels (due to an absence of<br />

inhalation toxicity criteria) which could be used for screening. Silver concentrations appear to be within the<br />

background range for the State of Washington. While other constituent concentrations appear to be<br />

elevated, they are not expected to present an unacceptable risk to receptors via the inhalation route at the<br />

concentrations present, particularly given the short expected exposure period for this area.<br />

Air<br />

Post-remediation air monitoring data collected in 1994 by the USFS were screened. All data collected was<br />

used in the screening and the maximum detected concentrations were used as the source concentrations.<br />

The data were collected from locations onsite, downwind, and upwind and are assumed to be representative<br />

of conditions onsite and in and around Holden Village. Background air concentrations were not evaluated<br />

in the screening due to a lack of information on site conditions at the time of sampling. It should be noted<br />

that short-term air concentrations measured during this monitoring event are not necessarily comparable to<br />

cleanup levels based on long-term exposures; however, the cleanup levels were utilized anyway as a very<br />

conservative screening tool. The results of the screening for this exposure medium are presented in Table<br />

7.1-22. Manganese was the only constituent selected as an IHS based on this screening.<br />

~:~~~~~~~rpwo~lo~dm-z\ri~~~.doc 7-20<br />

17693405.01 9Wuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5: 16 PMDRAFT FlNM RI REPORT<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!