13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2.4.1 Risk Cbaracterization for Worst-case Current Conditions<br />

For most ROCs, worst case exposures using the UCL or highest value were used as a screening technique to<br />

determine if risk was feasible under more ecologically realistic median exposure conditions. However, for<br />

sessile ROCs such as benthic invertebrates and terrestrial plants, reasonable worst case exposures may be<br />

representative of the risks found at particular localized areas of the site. Since all the remaining ROCs are<br />

free roaming and integrate their respective exposures through their home range, exposures to median<br />

concentrations are more ecologically realistic and r&presentstive. Even for benthic invertebrates and plants.<br />

the median concenuations are more indicative of conditions experienced by plant and animal populations in<br />

the local environment. In fact, since these data were collected only from areas expected to be contaminated.<br />

the median probably exceeds that which would be contacted by foraging animals, as well as much of the<br />

vegetation. Therefore, median exposures were utilized and are likely to be conservative as well as more<br />

ecologically relevant than UCLs. This is certainly true at the population level of organization.<br />

The tiered risk characterization for aquatic and terrestria exposure pathways are described below.<br />

Aquatic Exposure Pathways<br />

Risks to aquatic ROCs were evaluated in tiers of analysis, proceeding from wont case exposures to more<br />

reasonable exposures. In the fvst tier of analysis, only the UCL of the data collected from the South Bank<br />

of Railroad Creek was used. This data ensures a worst case estimation of risk since the water samples were<br />

collected from the creek bank where metals from seeps fmm the tailings piles have just begun to mix with<br />

the main stream of Railroad Creek. If risk was found under these conditions. the UCL data for the main<br />

stream of Railroad Creek were evaluated. The main stream samples were collected across the span of the<br />

creek and represent a more accurate "worst case" scenario of well mixed waters of Railroad Creek. If risk<br />

was still apparent, the median concentrations of the main stream were evaluated. This is a more accurate<br />

picture of the exposures encountered by pelagic invertebrates and fish as they move about in the creek.<br />

- Fish<br />

From Table 7.2.4-]A, it is apparent that trout may be at risk in the highest concentrations of copper (and<br />

possibly of zinc) along the South Bank of Railroad Creek. Therefore, since trout are not restricted to the<br />

worst case exposure conditions, further risk analysis is justified for the UCL of the main stream of Railroad<br />

Creek.<br />

From Table 7.2.4-IB, it may be seen that trout could be at risk from copper in the main stream of Railroad<br />

Creek. Further analysis of median water concentrations (Table 7.2.4-IC), showed that trout could be at risk<br />

from copper in the area of the mine site, and downstream.<br />

Benthic Invertebrates - Surface Water<br />

Hazard quotients (Table 7.2.4-2A and 7.2.4-28) for benthic invertebrates exposed to metals in surface<br />

waters were estimated by dividing the UCL of surface water concentrations along the South Bank of<br />

Railroad Creek found in Table 7.2.2-IA, below, by the chronic TRVs found in Table 7.2.3-28.<br />

G:\wpd~aWO~loldcn-2\ni7-O~Qc 7-62<br />

17693405419Uuly 21. <strong>1999</strong>.5:53 PM;DR.UT FWAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!