13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.133 Screening Level Evaluation of Data<br />

The screening level evaluation of data consisted of data segregation by exposure pathway, followed by a sis<br />

step comparative evaluation which served as the primary basis of the screening. Criteria used for the<br />

comparative evaluation are discussed above.<br />

The screening tables summarize the results of the data evaluation. As noted above, the mavimum<br />

concentrations presented in the source concentration columns of the tables represent the maximum obsenled<br />

for the medium of interest from the available data. If no toxicity criteria (and thus no Method A or Method<br />

B level) were available for a constituent, it was discussed qualitatively. Each exposure medium is discussed<br />

individually below.<br />

Surface Soil<br />

The maximum concentrations observed for each location were used as the source concentrations for<br />

comparison to the screening criteria based on soil ingestion. The background concentrations used for<br />

screening were statistically derived or obtained from Natural Background Soil Metals Concentrations in<br />

Washington State (Ecology, 1994) for the Yakima basin and <strong>Dames</strong> & <strong>Moore</strong> 1998 data. In addition. for<br />

those constituents which did not have an available area background or Ecology natural background level.<br />

background levels for the State of Washington (Dragun, 1991) are presented for comparison purposes. No<br />

constituents were eliminated as MSs based on the Dragun ranges, however.<br />

Holden Village<br />

Soil samples were collected throughout Holden Village. The samples were collected randomly throughout<br />

the village and at the closest proximity to the tailings piles. Given the spatial distribution of the soil<br />

samples, the results should adequately represent surface soil in and around Holden village.' The results of<br />

the screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-6. The only constituent selected as an IHS<br />

based on the screening was beryllium.<br />

Holden Village Vegetable Garden<br />

One soil sample was collected in the Holden Village vegetable garden. This sample result was used to<br />

evaluate both soil ingestion and ingestion of home-grown produce. The site measurements were compared<br />

against soil cleanup levels based on protection of residential receptors who may contact site-related<br />

constituents through ingestion. Comparisons against these criteria were considered conservative for the<br />

produce ingestion route since these cleanup levels were developed using exposure assumptions that are<br />

more conservative than those that would reasonably be assumed for ingestion of home-grown produce. The<br />

results of the screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-7. All constituents were eliminated<br />

as IHSs based on this screening.<br />

Baseball Field<br />

One soil sample was collected in the baseball field. The results of the screening for this exposure area are<br />

presented in Table 7.1-8. All constituents were eliminated as IHSs based on this screening.<br />

G:\.lwpdur\00~~\hold~n-2\ri\7-0~doc 7- 17<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 27. <strong>1999</strong>.5: 16 PM;DRAFT FINAL R1 REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!