13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

'<br />

chromium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, potassium.<br />

selenium, silver, sodium, thallium, uranium, and zinc), alkalinity, sulfate, total dissolved solids, total<br />

suspended solids, hardness, chloride, nitratelnitrite, color, cyanide, and ortholtotal phosphorous as<br />

outlined in the associated SAPS. In addition, samples collected from HBKG-I (located west of tailings<br />

pile 1) and DS-2 (located downgradient of tailings pile 3) were analyzed for TPH and PCBs. The results<br />

of laboratory analyses are presented in Section 5.4.2.<br />

3.3.1.2 Seeps<br />

Groundwater which flows from the slopes andlor ground surface are considered seeps. The presence of<br />

seeps is indicative of a shallow groundwater occurrence. Referring to Figures 3.2-1 and 3.3-2 and Tables<br />

3.0-1 (under "Seeps") and 3.2-2 through 3.2-5, the RI included the sampling of seeps and immediate areas<br />

where the seep water collected in order to better characterize the shallow groundwater underlying the Site.<br />

Discharge measurements and water quality samples were collected from all site seeps with measurable<br />

flow that were not derived completely by snowmelt. The discharge measurements were recorded through<br />

the use of portable flumes, collecting flow into containers of known volume, or visual estimation. A<br />

discussion of the seeps in terms of the groundwater conditions is presented in Section 4.3.3.7. In areas<br />

where multiple small-discharge seeps were found, composite, volume-weighted samples were collected.<br />

Samples were analyzed for the same parameter suite as groundwater samples. The results of laboratory<br />

analyses are presented in Section 5.4.2.<br />

3.3.1.3 Dye Tracer Survey I<br />

A dye tracer test program was conducted in two areas of the Site. Testing was conducted by introducing<br />

dye in the Honeymoon Heights drainage to assess potential'relationships of intermittent drainage from<br />

Honeymoon Heights to seeps SP-12, SP-23 and the portal drainage (Figure 3.3-2). An additional test was<br />

conducted by introducing dye into a partially open decant tower located on the top of tailings pile 1 to<br />

assess if water that flows into the decant tower contributes to the generation of seepage from the tailings<br />

pile.<br />

Dye was input at three points: (1) Honeymoon Heights drainage down gradient of the mapped shallow<br />

mine workings but up gradient of seeps SP-12 and SP-23, (2) Honeymoon Heights drainage up gradient<br />

of the mapped shallow mine workings and up gradient of seeps SP-12 and SP-23, and (3) In partially<br />

open decant tower located in tailings pile 1.<br />

Water samples were collected at SP-12, SP-23 and portal drainage (P-1) to assess water source<br />

relationships with the Honeymoon Heights drainage and from SP-1,'s~-2 and the south bank of Railroad<br />

Creek up gradient of the Copper Creek confluence to assess water source relationships between the<br />

tailings piles and seeps at Railroad Creek. The samples were analyzed for the expected dye tracer<br />

compound. The results of the dye tracer study are provided in Section 4.4.3.3.<br />

.<br />

3.3.1.4 Background<br />

Referring to Figure 3.3-2 and Tables 3.0-1 (under "Groundwater") and 3.2-2 through 3.2-5, two<br />

groundwater monitoring wells were installed by others in 1995 (USBM) in apparent upgradient locations<br />

(HBKG-I and HBKG-2). However, subsequent sampling and analysis of the water collected in the wells

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!