13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3.8 Lake Chelan<br />

5.3.8.1 Historical Data<br />

Surface water data were not collected from Lake Chelan during the R1; however, in 1989, Patrnont reported<br />

the results of an assessment of water quality conducted in Lake Chelan for Ecology in 1986. The report<br />

noted that the "observed in-lake concentrations of total recoverable arsenic, iron, and zinc exhibited<br />

temporal or spatial variations over the study period, and averaged 0.22 + 0.01 p a, 3.6 + 1.4 p a, and 2.0 +<br />

0.1 pg/L, respectively. The only discemable variation in metals was observed in the iron data, as in-lake<br />

levels peaked (6-12 pg/L)in lake surface waters during the spring, probably as a result of runoff inputs."<br />

Also noted in the report was that concentrations detected were below the applicable aquatic life, water<br />

quality criteria and drinking water standards (EPA, 1986). .<br />

5.3.9 Surface Water Quality Summary<br />

<<br />

Data collected from upstream stations in Railroad Creek were compiled with data collected fiom tributaries<br />

to Railroad Creek (Holden Creek, Big Creek, Copper Creek, and en mile Creek) and reference streams in<br />

the Stehekin area (South Fork Agnes Creek and Company Creek) to assess area background surface water<br />

quality. Background values were statistically derived under the MTCA guidance and compared to both<br />

Washington State and federal WQC where available. Where WQC were hardness corrected, a conservative<br />

value of 6.7 ppm was used for the state criteria as well as a minimum hardness value of 25 ppm for the<br />

federal criteria. The statistically derived background values are below state and federal WQC with the<br />

exception of lead (0.54 pa) and silver (C 0.04 pa) which are above state CWQC and AWQC,<br />

respectively. Lead and silver are below the federal WQC.<br />

Site data collected fiom Railroad Creek adjacent to and downstream of the mine-affected area were<br />

compared to WQC where established and background concentrations and MTCA Method B cleanup levels<br />

if WQC were not available. PCOCs were identified if concentrations were above WQC or MTCA Method<br />

B cleanup levels. Metal concentrations that were above background concentrations were identified as<br />

compounds of interest to assess with PCOCs in the fate and transport and risk assessment discussions in<br />

Sections 6.0 and 7.0.<br />

Copper, cadmium, iron, and zinc were identified as PCOCs in surface water in Railroad Creek at the stations<br />

adjacent to and downstream of the Site dependent upon sample location and sampling event. A summary<br />

table listing the sample station and sampling event with the PCOCs identified in Railroad Creek is located in<br />

Section 5.3.3.5. Aluminum and manganese concentrations were above background at stations adjacent to<br />

and downstream of the Site dependent upon sample location and sampling event. Parameters such as pH,<br />

dissolved oxygen, and specific conductance were generally similar at stations upstream, adjacent to, and<br />

downstream of the site. The highest concentrations of metals in 1997 correlated with the highest flow in<br />

Railroad Creek measured in May 1997. Concentrations for most metals increased downstream O~'RC-1 at<br />

RC-4. Concentrations from RC-4 (downstream of the portal drainage) to RC-2 (downstream of tailings pile .<br />

3) were similar or slightly decreased with the exception of iron which increased significantly at RC-7<br />

(adjacent to tailings pile 2). Concentrations generally decrease from RC-2 to RC-3 at Luceme. At several<br />

stations adjacent to and downstream of the mine area, metal concentrations measured in 1998 were above<br />

1997 concentrations. The difference in concentrations is likely relateh to the time and position of the<br />

sampling event on the hydrograph (Section 4;O).<br />

\U)M~SW\I\VOLI\COMMOMW~WPDATAUM5\REPORTSWOLDEN-2W-O-Odo5<br />

5-37<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 28. <strong>1999</strong>;11:09 AM:DRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!