13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

arsenic in the USFS guard station soil (transferred to air) to 5.69 x lo4 for chromium in Holden Village soil<br />

(transferred to air). There were no hazard quotients calculated for this pathway.<br />

Surface Water and Fish<br />

Hazard quotients for molybdenum in Copper Creek were 6.44 x 10.' for ingestion of water and 3.1 8 r 1 0.'<br />

for ingestion of fish, both of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer<br />

risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen.<br />

See~s and Mine Portal Drainage<br />

Seep and portal drainage data were evaluated separately. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both<br />

media were below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these<br />

media since IHSs were not carcinogens. The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 10.* for manganese in the<br />

1500-level main portal drainage to 5.3 1 x 10" for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage.<br />

Lead was present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the<br />

MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks<br />

could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure<br />

frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the<br />

cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and portal drainage are not expected to<br />

cause effects in potentially exposed populations.<br />

Cumulative Risk<br />

MTCA requires the evaluation of cumulative risk when Method C levels are used. ,Evaluation of cumulative<br />

cancer risk was accomplished by summing all cancer risks for each receptor population. Cumulative risk for<br />

noncancer effects was evaluated by summing hazard quotients for each IHS associated with the same toxic<br />

effect endpoint<br />

Cumulative cancer risks for forest service workers (I. I6 x 10.~) are less than the acceptable level of I x 10"<br />

(Table 7.1-43). Cumulative cancer risks for village residents/recreational users are 1.10 x 10". Ingestion of<br />

soil from the "storage" location in the maintenance yard is the primary contributor to the cumulative risk<br />

within the rounding error of 1 x 10". When. adjusted to the appropriate number of significant digits, the<br />

cumulative risk is the same as the acceptable level of 1 x 10". In addition, this cum~ilative risk assumes that<br />

the children exposed recreationally during the summertime grow up to become residents of Holden Village<br />

who work in the maintenance yard. This assumption is obviously extremely conservative.<br />

All noncancer hazard quotients are less than the acceptable level of one, with one exception. Using a<br />

combination of extremely conservative exposure assumptions that are unlikely to occur resulted in the<br />

cumulative hazard quotient for nephrotoxic effects (non-cancer kidney . effects) for village<br />

residents/recreational users of 1.26. This is due primarily to cadmium in portal drainage. This cumulative<br />

conservative risk evaluation assumes that the receptor ,is daily drinking one-half liter of 1500-level main<br />

portal drainage water, one-half liter of seep water, and one-half liter of Copper Creek water, as well as<br />

ingesting soil from the lagoon area and maintenance area, ingesting soil, and eating fish caught from onsite<br />

areas on exposed days. This combination of exposures is extremely conservative and highly unlikely to<br />

occur. The water ingestion rates used in the calculation of Method B criteria assumed that one-half of a<br />

G:\~mUXIJ~\holdcn-2\n17-O.doc 7-33 DAMES<br />

& MOORE<br />

17693405419Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!