13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Rating Calculations<br />

Referring to Table 4.3-4, flow measurements were collected on the Site at RC-4 from April 16 to October 4,<br />

1997. One flow measurement at RC-4 (June 16, 1997) and two flow measurements at RC-2 (July 10, 1997,<br />

collected by <strong>Dames</strong> & <strong>Moore</strong>, and July 25, 1996, collected by the USFS) were excluded; the excluded flow<br />

measurements appear to represent a physical shift in the stream channel conditions, probably due to scour<br />

and bed movement during the peak flow of June 16. Rating curves were developed for stations RC-4 and<br />

RC-2. A rating curve was not developed for RC-6 due to difficulties in collecting data at this station due to<br />

the irregular cross-section.<br />

Typically, the Railroad Creek streambed is armored and immobile during most flows; however, during peak<br />

flows, the bed may become mobile (i.e., the stream power is capable of moving the cobble- to boulder-size<br />

material which armors the streambed), which affects the stage discharge relation. Subsequent flow<br />

measurements at these stations returned to the previous rating, indicating that the effect of the mobile bed<br />

was short lived due to restabilization of the streambed. The rating curve data and rating graphs are provided<br />

in Appendix H. The rating curves have been developed by fitting a single log-log curve to the stage-<br />

discharge data using linear regression techniques. For both rating curves (RC-2 and RC-4), the regression<br />

analysis showed very good predictability, with correlation coefficients of 0.994 or better. This indicates that<br />

a single flow control over the range of flows measured adequately represents the channel flow conditions.<br />

The best fit ratingequation for RC-4 is:<br />

where:<br />

Discharge = 26.2(G-GZF)"2.58 1<br />

Discharge = flow estimate in cubic feet'per second (cfs)<br />

G = the observed staff gage height (feet)<br />

GZF = the gage height of zero flow (feet) = -0.4<br />

The best fit rating equation for RC-2 is:<br />

where:<br />

GZF = -3.0<br />

G:\WPDATA\OO5\REPORTSWOLDEN-ZUUWd.WC<br />

17693-005419Uuly 19, <strong>1999</strong>;4:J 1 P M;DW FINAL RI REPORT<br />

Discharge = O.OS(G-GZF)"5.5 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!