13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

on available and similar aquatic habitat. The selection of reference locations having habitats similar to<br />

the potentially affected locations was also performed and is a critical component of the analysis.<br />

Five aquatic sampling locations considered to be potentially affected by mine activities and two reference<br />

locations were selected within Railroad Creek. These sampling locations are described in Section 4.6. ,<br />

Reference Reach Selection<br />

Three additional reference locations were identified within streams located outside the Railroad Creek<br />

drainage area for comparison 'to habitat conditions in Railroad Creek downstream of the Site. The<br />

selection process included review of existing literature, interviews with knowledgeable parties, the<br />

development of key habitat variables, the analysis of candidate reaches. and final selection after a field<br />

reconnaissance was completed. The results of the process are described in Section 4.6.<br />

3.9.1.3 Phase II<br />

Phase I1 aquatic biota field investigations were conducted during September and early-October 1997 and<br />

consisted of habitat analysis, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling, and fish sampling.<br />

Aquatic Habitat<br />

Habitat quality influences benthic macroinvertebrate and fish communities within Railroad Creek<br />

regardless of physical or chemical perturbations associated with the Holden Mine. Although it is<br />

desirable to select sampling locations with similar or comparable habitat quality, not all habitat<br />

components will be identical between sampling locations. Therefore, habitat analyses were conducted at<br />

each sampling site to provide data as to the relative capability of reference and affected locations to<br />

support benthic macroinvertebrate and fish communities in the absence of chemical perturbations.<br />

Therefore, the intent of the habitat analyses was to investigate non-mine related factors potentially<br />

limiting the establishment of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish communities.<br />

Habitat analysis methodologies were employed to provide data for both qualitative and quantitative<br />

assessment of benthic macroinvertebrate and fish habitat conditions at each of the sampling locations.<br />

Macroinvertebrates are affected by a variety of habitat conditions including: substrate composition,<br />

substrate embeddedness and cementing, and current velocity (Bjornn et al., 1977; Minshall, 1985; Platts<br />

et al., 1983; Kiffney and Clements, 1996). Fish are also affected by these habitat conditions, in addition<br />

to poollriffle and runlbend ratios, and bank stability conditions (Plafkin et al., 1989, and Rosgen, 1994).<br />

To determine the physical habitat conditions at the aquatic biota sampling locations, procedures described<br />

in the rapid bioassessment procedure guidance document, "In-stream Biological Monitoring Handbook -<br />

For Wadable Streams in the Pacific Northwest" (EPA, 1993) were generally followed. Accordingly, the<br />

following parameters for rifflelrun prevalent streams in the Pacific Northwest were assessed:<br />

Bottom Substrate - percentage of bottom substrate that is fines<br />

Instream Cover - percentage of the stream that provides stable fish habitat<br />

Embeddedness - the degree to which boulders, rubble, or gravel are surrounded by fine<br />

sediment indicating suitability of the stream substrate as habitat for benthic<br />

macroinvertebrates and for fish spawning and egg incubation<br />

G:\wpdata\OO5hporUVloldm-2\riUd.da<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 19, <strong>1999</strong>;2:48 PM;DRAFT FNAL RI REPORT<br />

-!.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!