13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

H.\Holden\drafl final rirpt\S-7Whra\Tables\7-lg.xls<br />

7/20199<br />

TABLE 7.10<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SURFACE WATER DATA FROM RAILROAD CREEK<br />

(DATA COLLECTED FROM STATION RCJ DOWNSTREAM 1991 - 1998)<br />

HOLDEN MINE RUFS<br />

DAMES 6 MOORE JOB NO. 17693405019<br />

Parameters<br />

Total Metals [uaR;I<br />

Aluminum<br />

Arsenic '.<br />

Barium<br />

Beryllium '<br />

Cadmium<br />

Calcium .<br />

Chromium .<br />

&PW<br />

Iron<br />

Lead<br />

Magnesium<br />

Manganese.<br />

Mercury '<br />

Molybdenum'<br />

Nickel<br />

Potassium<br />

Selenium<br />

Silver<br />

Sod~um .<br />

Thallium<br />

Uranium<br />

Zinc<br />

Dissolved Metals (uak)<br />

Aluminum<br />

Arsenic<br />

Barium<br />

Beryllium<br />

Cadmium .<br />

Calcium<br />

Chromium<br />

Copper<br />

Iron .<br />

Lead.<br />

Magnesium'<br />

Manganese<br />

Mercury<br />

Molybdenum<br />

Nickel .<br />

Potassium .<br />

Selenium<br />

Silver<br />

Sodium .'<br />

Thallium<br />

Uranium<br />

Zinc<br />

8 Analyses<br />

20<br />

14<br />

17<br />

17<br />

20<br />

50<br />

17<br />

53<br />

37<br />

54<br />

50<br />

20<br />

8<br />

8<br />

18<br />

50<br />

9<br />

18<br />

50<br />

8<br />

5<br />

54<br />

23<br />

15<br />

2 1<br />

2 1<br />

24<br />

21<br />

21<br />

24<br />

21<br />

24<br />

21<br />

2 1<br />

8<br />

11<br />

23<br />

21<br />

8<br />

22<br />

21<br />

12<br />

8<br />

24<br />

STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS RCJ<br />

Approximate<br />

d of Detectloris Maximum Conc. Minimum Conc. Range of RL Distribution Mean Standard Deviation Median<br />

UCL (95%)<br />

20 300 37 None Lognormal 1 53 74.11 150 201<br />

11 0.76 0.32 1 Lognormal 0.48 0.13 048 0.54<br />

17 10 5.01 None Neither 6.58 1.43 6,22 10<br />

0 NA NA 0.04 - 1 NA NA NA N A NA<br />

16 0.66 0.09 0.07 -0 11 Lognormal 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.45<br />

50 9950 3800 None Lognormal 6059 1465 5818 6417<br />

2 0.2 0.2 0.12 -5 NA NA N A 0.2 0.2<br />

27 43.5 1.4 0.8 -10.5 Lognormal 8.28 9.05 5 12.85<br />

37 23W) 40 None Lognormal 592 419 430 755<br />

11 11 0.159 0.1 - 16.5 NA NA NA 3 11<br />

50 1490 310 None Lognormal 731 232 695 790<br />

20 26 6.46 None Lognormal 13.05 4.71 12.65 15.19<br />

5 0.002 0.00014 0.1 Lognormal 0.08 0.03 0.0012 ('279)<br />

8 0.68 0.47 None Lognormal , 0.55 0.06 0.55 0.6<br />

12 0.6 0.4 10 Neither 1.98 2.20 0.55 0.6<br />

43 870 140 500 - 533.5 Lognormal 492 174 51 9 547<br />

0 NA NA 0.2- 1 NA NA ? N A NA<br />

3 ' 0.2 0.03 0.04 - 0.2 NA NA NA 0 119 0.2<br />

50 2100 520 None Lognormal 928 329 eEO 1004<br />

1 1 1 0.04 - 1 N A NA NA 1 1<br />

5<br />

44<br />

0 1<br />

140<br />

0.05<br />

0 4<br />

None<br />

0.7 - 10<br />

Lognormal<br />

Nether<br />

0.07<br />

28.9<br />

0.02<br />

27.93<br />

006<br />

22<br />

0.1<br />

140<br />

16 90 3.2 6 - 30 Normal 37.77 28.5 40 47.97<br />

8 0.31 0.18 1-2 Lognormal 0.46 0.30 0.31 0.66<br />

21<br />

0<br />

18<br />

16.2<br />

NA<br />

0.72<br />

4.7<br />

NA<br />

0.07<br />

None<br />

0.04 - 4<br />

0.2 - 1<br />

Nether<br />

NA<br />

Lognormal<br />

7.97<br />

NA<br />

0.28<br />

3.57<br />

NA<br />

0.20<br />

6 4<br />

tJA<br />

0 20<br />

16.2<br />

NA<br />

0.41<br />

18 10100 3830 WOO Lognormal 5981 2176 5600 6982<br />

0 NA NA 0.2 -5 NA NA NA tJA NA<br />

23 26.9 0.39 0.1 Lognormal 7.73 7.27 .2.7 19.62<br />

20 1290 40 100 Lognormal<br />

373 343 240 612<br />

10<br />

21<br />

0.5<br />

1520<br />

0.04<br />

420<br />

02-1<br />

None<br />

NA<br />

Neither<br />

NA<br />

800<br />

NA<br />

344<br />

0 098<br />

6%<br />

0.50<br />

1520<br />

20 26 3 5 0.9 Lognormal 11.96 5.7 9.97 18.49<br />

4 0.00064 O.OMX)7 0.1 Lognormal 0.25 0.03 0.C25 (3954)<br />

11<br />

10<br />

0.64<br />

0.6<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

None<br />

0.2 .10<br />

Normal<br />

NA<br />

0.48<br />

NA<br />

0.11<br />

NA<br />

0 il<br />

!; 1<br />

0.54<br />

0.6<br />

11<br />

0<br />

930<br />

N A<br />

200<br />

NA<br />

500<br />

0.2 - 1<br />

Lognormal<br />

NA<br />

417<br />

NA<br />

246<br />

NA<br />

250<br />

t iA<br />

531<br />

NA<br />

2 0.09 0.08 001 -02 NA NA NA 0 S85 0.09<br />

21<br />

0<br />

3<br />

1750<br />

NA<br />

0.07<br />

400<br />

NA<br />

0.01<br />

None<br />

0.04 - 1<br />

0.04 - 0.1<br />

Lognormal<br />

NA<br />

N A .<br />

935<br />

NA<br />

NA<br />

399<br />

NA<br />

NA<br />

&XI<br />

t!A<br />

0 57<br />

1117<br />

NA<br />

0.07<br />

23 98 13 2 Lwnormal 42 6 26.7 :;8 68.25<br />

SWMical Notes: (Statistical calculations were performed using Washington Department of Ecology's MTCAStat Excel V 5 Macro (Module 2.1). downloaded from their web site.)<br />

Madmum and minimum concentrations are based on detected dues only.<br />

Range of reporting limits (RL) are based on results reported as not deteded.<br />

Distribution is determ~ned based on the MTCA stat program by analyzing the data through the W-TesP or 'D'Agostino's test". Where data is not lognormally nor normally distributed. the distribution is noted as *Neither.<br />

When approximate distribution is reported as-neithef, the madmum concentration is reported as the 95% UCL and is presented in BOLD font. !<br />

If UCL is repofled in brackets (UCL value). this indicates that the calculated resun from MTCAStal was reported to be unusually high. Therefore, the calculated 95% UCL is suspect.<br />

The mean is an arithmetii mean if data are normally distributed or if distribution is indicated as 'Neithef. The reported m n for lognormally distributed data is a lognormal mean.<br />

Statistical analysis was not performed on data sets where 50% or greater of the results were reported as not detected. Otly m;?dmum and minimum concentrations are reported, if applicable.<br />

For these data sets. a calculated median is based an detected mlues only.<br />

Page 4 of 4<br />

TABLE 7.10<br />

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 6 COMPARISON OF<br />

WATER QUALlTY DATA (DOWNSTREAM)<br />

FROM RCJ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!