13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.2.2.6 Conceptual Site Model<br />

The CSM integrates sources, release mechanisms. transpon media, transfer mechanisms, and complete<br />

receptor exposure pathways. For this Baseline ERA, three relatively distinct exposure sources form the<br />

bases of the CSM. These sources are: 1) surface water and sediments, 2) tailings soils, and 3) seep water.<br />

The ecological CSM for this site (Figure 7.2-1) provides a pictorial representation of the pathways of<br />

potential PCOC movement h m primary sources to secondary, and tertiary sources and receptors. It is<br />

these relationships that drive potential environmental and exposure risks, as well as risk management<br />

decision making.<br />

7.23 Analysis<br />

7.23.1 Assessment and Measurement Endpoints<br />

Definitions of endpoints and methods of endpoint selection generally follow the guidance and draft<br />

guidance provided by EPA (1989, 1994). To determine if adverse impacts have occurred or are occurring as<br />

a result of constituents released by past mining activities, it is necessary to determine which assessment<br />

endpoints will be used in the evaluation and to understand how the various measurement endpoints relate to<br />

the assessment endpoints in the overall weight-of-evidence approach adopted herein.<br />

The process of endpoint selection begins with identification of risk management goals for environmental<br />

components and ROC that may be susceptible to chemical substances in the environment. In general. the<br />

goal for this site is to protect the populations, communities, and ecosystems that may be exposed to site-<br />

related PCOCs.<br />

Assessment Endpoints<br />

Assessment endpoints are general, large-scale expressions of environmental components or characteristics<br />

. that may be at risk and, therefore, require protection. Although related and highly interdependent,<br />

measurement and assessment endpoints are not the same. In general, measurement endpoints are actual<br />

measurements of chemical or biological parameters that are used to evaluate the assessment endpoints. This<br />

evaluation then forms the basis for extrapolation of results to higher levels of organization or complexity.<br />

The assessment endpoints identified for this investigation are:<br />

Decline in health and viability of populations of avian carnivores<br />

Decline in health and viability of populations of terrestrial mammals<br />

Decline in health and viability of populations of fish and other aquatic receptors<br />

These assessment endpoints are evaluated specifically with information obtained fiom measurement<br />

endpoints (below) to determine if reduced survival, impaired reproduction, or growth inhibition in local<br />

populations and communities are likely. The assessment endpoints were evaluated as the no observed<br />

adverse effect level (NOAEL) fiom toxicity benchmarks, guidelines, or toxicity reference values (TRVs)<br />

for endpoints having potential effects on populations (i.e., growth, reproduction, development) of plants<br />

or animals.<br />

G:\~UY)~\hoIdcn-2\n\7QQdoc<br />

17693-00501 Wuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!