13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The results of an analysis of topographic map data (e.g., average slope, reach length, reach height) for each<br />

slope reach are summarized in Table 4.2-3. This data, in particular average slope,.was used in combination<br />

with the field characterization and trench log data to determine the criteria for assessing erosion potential.<br />

~verage slope was defined as the slope from the top of the tailings (at the tailings edge) to the base of the<br />

riprap (as best as could be determined from the map contours and field knowledge of the riprap location).<br />

The criteria for determining erosion potential of each slope reach was based on the field mapping, .<br />

observations of erosion processes occurring on the slopes, topographic map data, and the estimated high<br />

water lines. Specific criteria were developed that included:<br />

t<br />

Average slope of reach from the top of the slope to the base of the riprap<br />

Range of slopes occurring across the reach<br />

Slope setback From creek channel (the average distance from the toe of the slope to the<br />

bank of the main channel)<br />

Slope setback from crest of riprap (the average distance from the toe of the slope to the<br />

crest of the riprap)<br />

Composition of slope materials (e.g., sand talus, gravel cap, cemented sands)<br />

Condition or existence of vegetation, andlor grass mats I<br />

Extent and magnitude of current erosion processes I<br />

Table 4.2-2 summarizes the criteria for grading the slopes erosion potential. I<br />

Based on the developed criteria, an erosion potential for each slope reach was assigned (Table 4.2-3)<br />

(Figure 4.2-21). In general, slopes along tailings pile 1 have a moderate to moderately low erosion potential<br />

due to the low average slopes, the distance that the pile is setback from the creek, the amount of vegetation<br />

present, and the condition of the gravel cap. Slopes along tailings pile 2 have a high to moderately high<br />

erosion potential due to the steep slopes, high amount of exposed tailings, little or no setback to the creek,<br />

and the lack of a gravel cap or vegetation. Slopes along tailings pile 3 have a moderate to low erosion<br />

potential due to the lower height, relatively sufficient setback (i.e., sufficient space to build talus to the angle<br />

of repose), the amount of vegetation present, and the good condition of the gravel cap.<br />

There is some level of uncertainty associated with the findings of the erosion potential evaluation due to the<br />

difficulty in quantifying all of the variables associated with surface erosion. However, the findings are<br />

consistent with our expectations based on past experience on other site with similar geologic and hydrologic<br />

conditions.<br />

4.2.5 Mine Subsidence Potential<br />

As mentioned in Section 4.1.3.1, the uppermost stopes within the mine above the 1500-level are mapped<br />

to be within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface. Figures 4.2-14 and 4.2-1 5 display the lateral and<br />

G:\WPDATA\OO5\REPORTSWOLDEN-2WW-O.WC<br />

17693-00S-OI9Vuly 19, <strong>1999</strong>;4:51 PM:DRAn FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!