13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Robins drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled earthworm metal concentrations were accurate<br />

Table 7.2.4-13A shows that Robins could be at risk from cadmium in the subsurface tailings. lagoon, and<br />

maintenance yard, and fiom zinc in the subsurface soils, tailings pile 3, the lagoon, and the maintenance<br />

yard, and from lead in the lagoon and maintenance yard.<br />

When robins were exposed to the median concentrations in the subsurface soils. and tailings pile 3, there<br />

was no risk from either cadmium or zinc (Table 7.2.4-138). It is highly likely that the input parameters for<br />

the robin vastly overestimate the actual exposure conditions because risk was also shown for robins feeding<br />

on earthworms exposed to site background concentrations of cadmium and the risk characterization does not<br />

account for robins relatively large forage ranges.<br />

However, because of the limited data for the lagoon and maintenance yard soils, it was not possible to<br />

further estimate risk in these areas. It should be noted however, that since earthworms were not observed in<br />

the areas where metal concentrations were elevated, it is likely that there is not a complete exposure<br />

pathways to robins in these areas.<br />

Little Brown Bat<br />

Hazard quotients for little brown bats feeding on emergent aquatic insects (Table 7.2.4-14) were calculated<br />

by dividing the doses estimated in Table 7.2.3-1 8 by the TRVs in Table 7.2.3-4B. The default assumptions<br />

were:<br />

bats fed only on aquatic insects From Railroad Creek<br />

bats drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled insect metal concentrations were accurate for Railroad Creek<br />

It is apparent that little brown bat is not at risk from consumption of emergent insects or surface waters<br />

(Table 7.2.4-14). Therefore, there was no need to further evaluate risk to bats along Railroad Creek.<br />

7.2.4.2 Modifying Factors<br />

Because the most difficult aspect of risk characterization is the quantification of the effect of home range on<br />

exposure, median exposure concentrations were used. However, is should be noted that the red-tailed hawk,<br />

and mule deer also move seasonally. The red-tailed hawk is only a visitor during the summer months and<br />

then migrates to Central and South America. Although the mule deer does not migrate per se, it does move<br />

to lower elevations during the winter when snow fall exceeds its ability to reach grasses and forbs, or to<br />

move about easily. The little brown bat is only active during the summer, and hibernates during the winter.<br />

While mink do not migrate or hibernate, the onset of cold weather is likely to reduce the consumption of<br />

aquatic species. This assures that none of the terrestrial ROCs will be exposed to the worst case or median<br />

exposure conditions used for risk characterization in Section 7.2.4.1 above.<br />

G:\~W)~\bolda1-2\n17-O.dos 7-70<br />

17693-005-01 9Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>:J: 16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!