Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.1.4 Site-specific Human Health Risk Assessment The site-specific HHRA was conducted for those IHSs and exposure pathways (Table 7.1-36. Figure 7.1-2) which significantly contributed to the risk at the site as determined in the screening level human health assessment. The methodology for the site-specific HHRA followed the following steps: Characterize the relevant exposure pathways Develop exposure concentrations based on statistical evaluation of the data Characterize the toxicity of the IHSs Develop site-specific (MTCA Method C) levels Characterize risks associated with the site Discuss uncertainties in the risk characterization Each step of the site-specific HHRA is discussed in detail in below. 7.1.4.1 Exposure Assessment for Refined Exposure Pathways Exposure Pathways Exposure pathways evaluated in the site-specific HHRA are shown conceptually in the exposure pathway model (Figure 7.1-2) and detailed, along with IHSs, in Table 7.1-36. Exposure to IHSs in soil, air, sediments, surface water, seeps, and mine portal drainage is assumed to represent potential, exposure routes of concern for the site. Development of Exposure Point Concentrations The potential magnitude of exposure is determined by measuring or estimating the exposure point concentrations of IHSs available in various media at "exchange boundariesn (e.g., the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, or skin). For the purposes of the site-specific HHRA, the exposure concentration was estimated to be the 95 percent upper confidence limit (UCL) concentration for the data set. When there was an insufficient number of samples or a high percentage of uncensored data (data reported as below the detection limit). 95 percent UCL concentrations could not be calculated. For these data sets, the maximum detected concentration was used for the exposure concentration. The method for calculating the 95 percent UCL was dependent on the distribution of the data (i.e., normal, lognormal, or neither). The distribution of the data and the 95 percent UCL concentrations were calculated using the Ecology MTCAStat V2.1 Excel Macro. The statistical tables included in this section (tables 7.1A through 7.1K) show the distributions and 95 percent UCL concentrations, when calculated, for each media. Table 7.1-37 details the exposure concentrations for each IHS used in the site-specific HHRA. 7.1.4.2 Toxicity Characterization The toxicity assessment determines the relationship between the magnitude of exposure to an IHS and the nature and magnitude of adverse health effects that may result from such exposure. Chemical toxicity is divided into two categories, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic, based on the type of adverse health effect exerted. Health risks are calculated differently for these two types of effects because their toxicity criteria G:\vpstl~~UloIdcn-2\ni700doc 7-24 17693-005-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>,5:16 PM;DRAff FINAL RI REPORT
are based on different mechanistic assumptions and expressed in different units. The two approaches are discussed below. Available toxicity criteria for humans are summarized in Table 7.1-38, and brief toxicological profiles for the IHSs are presented in Table 7.1-44. Non-Carcinogenic Effects Non-carcinogenic cleanup levels were calculated using reference doses (RfDs) developed by USEPA. An RtD is an estimate of the daily lifetime exposure level to humans (expressed in units of mg of chemicalkg of body weightjday), including sensitive subgroups, that is likely to be without appreciable risk of deleterious effects (USEPA, 1989). RfDs are usually derived from oral exposure studies with the most sensitive species, strain and sex of experimental animal known, the assumption being that humans are as sensitive as the most sensitive organism tested. They are based on the assumption that thresholds (exposure levels below which no adverse effect is expected) exist for non-carcinogenic effects, and incorporate uncertainty factors to account for the required extrapolations from animal studies and to ensure protection of sensitive human subpopulations. RfDs for constituents considered in the HHRA were obtained, whenever possible, from CLARC II. Table 7.1-38 summarizes both oral and inhalation RfDs and the toxic effects endpoint for IHSs. Carcinogenic Effects In contrast to non-carcinogenic effects, USEPA typically assumes that there is no threshold for carcinogenic responses; that is, any dose of a carcinogen is considered to pose some finite risk of cancer. The evidence for human carcinogenicity of a chemical is derived from two sources: chronic studies with laboratory animals, and human epidemiological studies where an increased incidence of cancer is associated with exposure to the chemical. As with the non-cancer toxicity studies, the most sensitive labratory species is generally used in cancer protocols. Since risks at the low levels of exposure usually encountered by humans are difficult to quantify directly by either animal or epidemiological studies, mathematical models are used to extrapolate from high experimental to low environmental doses. The slope of the extrapolated dose-response curve is used to calculate the cancer slope factor or potency factor (CPF), which defines the incremental lifetime cancer risk per unit of carcinogen (in units of risk per mg/kg/day). The linearized multi-stage model for low-dose extrapolation most often used by USEPA (USEPA, 1986a) is one of the most conservative available. and leads to a upper-bound estimate of risk (the upper 95 percent confidence limit on the modeled animal dose- response slope). The probability that the true risk is higher than that estimated is thus only 5 percent. Actual risk is likely to be lower, and could even be zero (USEPA, 1986a). Each tested chemical is assigned a weight-of-evidence classification that expresses its potential for human carcinogenicity. The USEPA's weight-of-evidence classification system is shown below: G:\~pd#uW)S\rrponrUloldco-2\n174~da 7-25 17693-005-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>;5: 16 PMDRMT FINAL RI REPORT
Page 1 and 2:
I DAMES & MOORE A DAMES & MOORE GRO
Page 3:
DAMES & MOORE .. A DAMES 8 MOORE GR
Page 6 and 7:
INTRODUCTION The olden Mine was ope
Page 8 and 9:
The Forest Service implemented site
Page 10 and 11:
Remainder of Year - After the sprin
Page 12 and 13:
' Water Portal Drainage quality mea
Page 14 and 15:
Groundwater discharge from the tail
Page 16 and 17:
Trout An intermediate potential ris
Page 18 and 19:
Windblown Tailings Material The ero
Page 20 and 21:
Lucerne Bar Sampling Additional sed
Page 22 and 23:
3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION METHODOL
Page 24 and 25:
... 5.3 SURFACE WATER .............
Page 26 and 27:
8.3.3 Surface Water ...............
Page 28 and 29:
Table 4.6-3A - Table. 4.6-4 - Table
Page 30 and 31:
Table 7.1-1 - Table 7.1-5 - Table 7
Page 32 and 33:
Table 7.2.4-2D - Table 7.2.4-3 - Ta
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 4.2-2 - Figure 4.2-3 - Figur
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 5.3-9 - Figure 5.3-10 - Figu
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 6.5-9 - Figure 6.5-10 - Figu
Page 40 and 41:
ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION GLOSSARY @
Page 42 and 43:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The .Holden Mine i
Page 44 and 45:
sediment reference location" includ
Page 46 and 47:
Volumes 11,111. and IV Section 4.0
Page 48 and 49:
. . . . .................. ........
Page 50 and 51:
2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The Holden Min
Page 52 and 53:
~:\wpdaca\005\rc~o~iol&n-2~i~-0.dae
Page 54 and 55:
2.5 SUMMARY OF ISSUES OF POTENTIAL
Page 56 and 57:
G:\tupdata\005\repomUloldm-t\riU-O.
Page 58 and 59:
1986 1988 1988 1989 Science Applica
Page 60 and 61:
piemmeter water samples as Service.
Page 62 and 63:
G:\~at~\00SLeporuUIoIden-2~V4.d0~ 1
Page 64 and 65:
SOURCE: Wtem et al., 1992 USGS Chda
Page 66 and 67:
3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION METHODOL
Page 68 and 69:
wilderness boundary with the intent
Page 70 and 71:
The test pits were excavated utiliz
Page 72 and 73:
were transferred to AutoCAD maps of
Page 74 and 75:
3.2.1 Streamflow Suweys Streamflow
Page 76 and 77:
Site. Samples collected for dissolv
Page 78 and 79:
' chromium, copper, iron, lead, mag
Page 80 and 81:
elevated metals based on field scre
Page 82 and 83:
Wolman pebble counts), occurrence a
Page 84 and 85:
Assessment by Mining Consultant The
Page 86 and 87:
discussions of the 1992 data have n
Page 88 and 89:
VelocityDepth - influences benthic
Page 90 and 91:
To the extent practical, electrosho
Page 92 and 93:
Proportion of individuals as top ca
Page 94 and 95:
provide adequate data to cany forwa
Page 96 and 97:
3.1 1 TASK 11 - DATA EVALUATION 3.1
Page 98 and 99:
3.11.4.2 Two-Dimensional Groundwate
Page 100 and 101:
TABLE 3.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
TABLE 3.2-1 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM FOR
Page 108 and 109:
TABLE 3.2.2 ANALYnCAL PROORAM FOR G
Page 110 and 111:
TABLE 1.24 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM FOR G
Page 112 and 113:
TABLE 3.24 ANALmCAL PROORAM FOR GRO
Page 114 and 115:
SOURCE: USGS Topographic Map, State
Page 116 and 117:
- Figure 3.0-3 DAMES & MOORE HOLDEN
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 3.1-2 DAMES & MOORE ! RI SOI
Page 121 and 122:
Fill (2) Vent (1) SOURCE: Base map
Page 123:
SOURCE: Base map information from U
Page 126 and 127:
SOURCE: WIteffi et a/., 1992 USGS C
Page 129 and 130:
DAMES & MOORE Figure 3.4-2 FLOCCULE
Page 133 and 134:
i I i .4 i ,i i i\ i '.\ i \ \ i I
Page 135 and 136:
4.1.2 Site Surface Features Referri
Page 137 and 138:
Hydroelectric Plant Electrical powe
Page 139 and 140:
Water seepage emanates, in the spri
Page 141 and 142:
'7 ~t the Site, approximately mid-w
Page 143 and 144:
system delineated by ditches and re
Page 145 and 146:
Section I-I' and shows the six tunn
Page 147 and 148:
The uppermost stopes within the min
Page 149 and 150:
make up the earth's surface. The st
Page 151 and 152:
silver, and included 34,000 tons of
Page 153 and 154:
strength was determined by Hart Cro
Page 155 and 156:
gravels are variable in thickness a
Page 157 and 158:
wetlands and adjacent to Railroad C
Page 159 and 160:
Several faults have been mapped in
Page 161 and 162:
the coefficient of Friction. Geomor
Page 163 and 164:
The groundwater levels used for the
Page 165 and 166:
Tailings pile 3 is situated near th
Page 167 and 168:
vertical extent of the underground
Page 169 and 170:
from the roof, then evaluating the
Page 171 and 172:
4.2.8 Potential Borrow Source Areas
Page 173 and 174:
for good quality riprap would neces
Page 175 and 176:
May and June, which coincide with t
Page 177 and 178:
Rating Calculations Referring to Ta
Page 179 and 180:
with little or no braiding. Upstrea
Page 181 and 182:
Discharge in Railroad Creek was mon
Page 183 and 184:
model predicted a 100-year flood at
Page 185 and 186:
The data logger, or transducer, was
Page 187 and 188:
submerged at high water levels. Flo
Page 189 and 190:
this, it is possible that the snow
Page 191 and 192:
4.3.5 Basin Average Climatic Water
Page 193 and 194:
surface erosional features provide
Page 195 and 196:
* The D50 equation is obtained from
Page 197 and 198:
effect of a 0.05-foot stage increas
Page 199 and 200:
discussed in' Section 6.8.2 of this
Page 201 and 202:
Observations During Aquatic snorkel
Page 203 and 204:
covers limited portions of the Site
Page 205 and 206:
Bedrock Bedrock underlies the entir
Page 207 and 208:
high as 0.1 to 0.2 feet per foot (F
Page 209 and 210:
Generalized Site-Wide Groundwater R
Page 211 and 212:
4.4.3.5 Groundwater Uses Groundwate
Page 213 and 214:
Reach 1 Since there are no observed
Page 215 and 216:
evaluated on the basis of judgment
Page 217 and 218:
and only started flowing afier seve
Page 219 and 220:
interceptor ditches likely carry pr
Page 221 and 222:
The inflow of groundwater in the fo
Page 223 and 224:
Accuracy The accuracy of the bedroc
Page 225 and 226:
aquifer from the portal drainage, o
Page 227 and 228:
Reference Reaches RC-10. Railroad C
Page 229 and 230:
accessed, including the RM-3 "Dan's
Page 231 and 232:
The banks are relatively nonvegetat
Page 233 and 234:
Ratio of Shredder Functional Feedin
Page 235 and 236:
without scrapers and organisms requ
Page 237 and 238:
present at RC-6, RC-I, RC-3, SFAC-I
Page 239 and 240:
and stumps with bark piles surround
Page 241 and 242:
Tailings Piles A flock of violet-gr
Page 243 and 244:
4.6.3 Threatened or Endangered Spec
Page 245 and 246:
Background Information Grizzly bear
Page 247 and 248:
anadromous populations occurring in
Page 249 and 250:
Creek drainage, they are more commo
Page 251 and 252:
R16E S7). These species include an
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
TABLE 4.1 -1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
Page 259 and 260:
Pitchblende Sericite Biotite Source
Page 261 and 262:
TABLE 4.2-2a EROSION POTENTIAL RANK
Page 263 and 264:
TABLE 4.2-4 RIP-RAP CONDITION RANKI
Page 265 and 266:
TABLE 4.24 BORROW SOURCE EVALUATION
Page 267 and 268:
TABLE 4.3-1 AVERAGE MONTHLY FLOW PE
Page 269 and 270:
TABLE 4.33 AVERAGE MONTHLY POTENTIA
Page 271 and 272:
TABLE 4.3& SURFACE WATER FIELD PARA
Page 273 and 274:
TABLE 4.3da SURFACE WATER flELD PAR
Page 275 and 276:
TABLE 4.3-5 MONTHLY STREAMFLOW AVER
Page 277 and 278:
NA = not measured NF = no flow S =
Page 279 and 280:
TABLE 4.34b AVERAGE MONTHLY WATER B
Page 281 and 282:
Station RC- I RC-4 RC-9 Copper Cree
Page 283 and 284:
Hydrostratigraphic Unit SoilIFill C
Page 285 and 286:
TABLE 4.4-2 GROUNDWATER FIELD PARAM
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Stream Reach RC-4 to RC-7 RC-7 to R
Page 293 and 294:
TABLE 4.4-6 RESULTS OF OCTOBER 1998
Page 295 and 296:
Seep SP-8 was observed flowing in l
Page 297 and 298:
TABLE 4.448 SEEPAGE FIELD PARAMETER
Page 299 and 300:
TABLE 4.4- SEEPAGE FIELD PARAMETERS
Page 301 and 302:
TABLE 4.4-9 REACH 1 SITE-SPECIFIC W
Page 303 and 304:
Habitat Variable Stream Velocity an
Page 305 and 306:
a TABLE 4.6-2A BENTHIC MACROINVERTE
Page 307 and 308:
TABLE 4.6-2C DISTRIBUTION FIT FOR M
Page 309 and 310:
TABLE 4.6-3 TROUT POPULATION ESTIMA
Page 311 and 312:
Date September 9 September 10 Septe
Page 313 and 314:
TABLE 4.6-6 . HERPETOFAUNA LIKELY T
Page 315 and 316:
North-aspect Slope Sharp-shinned ha
Page 317 and 318:
! I TABLE 4.6-10 MAMMAL SPECIES OBS
Page 319 and 320:
CLIENT PRI VILECED AND CONFIDENTlA
Page 321 and 322:
TABLE 4.6-13 U.S. FOREST SERVICE SU
Page 323 and 324:
TABLE 4.6-15 SURVEY AND MANAGE SPEC
Page 325 and 326:
. . ; SOURCE: Wen et al., 1992 ,, .
Page 327 and 328:
SOURCE: Base mrlp information from
Page 329 and 330:
____------ ---_ SOURCES: Base map i
Page 331:
Page 334 and 335:
' Railroad Creek SOURCES: Northwest
Page 336 and 337:
- Approximate f' Plan View Outline
Page 338 and 339:
' DAMES LEGEND - Approximate extent
Page 340 and 341:
- LEGEND Approximate extent of unde
Page 342 and 343:
LEGEND ==s Approximate extent of un
Page 344 and 345:
- E 2f W . E Volcanic Arc Cascadia
Page 346:
,.' \ /- i \\ \ i i \ \..--A j \ /.
Page 349 and 350:
DMES & MOORE Figure 4.2-6a HOLDEN M
Page 351:
0.7 D.8 D. 9 E.0 E.l E.2 E.3 E.4 E.
Page 354 and 355:
LEGEND Bedrock F WEST SOURCE: North
Page 356 and 357:
G NORTH .- C u C al Alluvial rn Rew
Page 358 and 359:
File: g:/l7693005mA-4st.slp Glacial
Page 360 and 361:
3.24 3.23 X 3.22 w n 3.21 c .W 3.20
Page 362 and 363:
DAMES & MOORE A aAMES & MOORE GROUP
Page 364 and 365:
SOURCE: Base map inADrmatim from US
Page 366 and 367:
Figure 4.2-21 d HOLDEN MINE SUBSIDE
Page 368 and 369:
* r- Job DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 8 MO
Page 370:
SOURCE: Golder and Associates, 1990
Page 374 and 375:
SOURCE: Base nmp inlbnaficxl from U
Page 376 and 377:
SOURCE: Wters et al., 1992 0 2.5 5
Page 378 and 379:
D. 7 0.8 SOURCES: Base map informaf
Page 380 and 381:
SOURCE: Base map inlbrmatim lrom US
Page 382 and 383:
0.00 I I I I I I April May June Jul
Page 384:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 6. MOORE GROU
Page 388 and 389:
1.80 - 1 .. --.- -- 0.9 1.60 - ! Po
Page 390 and 391:
Note: No data available for June 19
Page 392:
: g ; . - . .... . -._. ........ .
Page 395 and 396:
LEGEND ..-.-.-.-.- Freewater surfac
Page 397:
SOURCE: Base map inlbrmation from U
Page 400:
' D. 7 . 0.8 D. 9 E.0 E. 1 E.2 E.3
Page 404 and 405:
C 0 % iil f 3192 - 3190 - 3188 3186
Page 406:
, -.I p./ ,/' i i .\ i i i -.-. i '
Page 409:
~ob NO. 1769300~019 Infiltration to
Page 412 and 413:
Overland . Flow Areawest of Site Ov
Page 414:
' SOURCE: Base map information from
Page 417 and 418:
D. 9 E.0 E.2 E.3 E.4 0.7 SOURCE: Ba
Page 419 and 420:
...... -.: - - ........... 3790 ,.-
Page 423 and 424:
DRAFT FINAL Remedial Investigation
Page 425 and 426:
(RAOs) section of the Feasibility S
Page 427 and 428:
Also included in WAC 173-201A are p
Page 429 and 430:
MTCA defines the methods and descri
Page 431 and 432:
The historical data for samples col
Page 433 and 434:
groundwater was encountered at appr
Page 435 and 436:
were below MTCA levels with the fol
Page 437 and 438:
sampling rounds, the field filter b
Page 439 and 440:
Department of Ecology samples colle
Page 441 and 442:
data sets where the total value was
Page 443 and 444:
5.3.1.3 Summary Based on the statis
Page 445 and 446:
adjacent to the Site were not neces
Page 447 and 448:
RC-4 is located downstream of the p
Page 449 and 450:
RC-2 is'located immediately downstr
Page 451 and 452:
In May 1997, copper (21.5 pg5) in t
Page 453 and 454:
Data collected from upstream statio
Page 455 and 456:
of water exiting from the portal. S
Page 457 and 458:
5.3.4.3 Historical Portal Drainage
Page 459 and 460:
parameters did not indicate seasona
Page 461 and 462:
The portal drainage was sampled at
Page 463 and 464:
and sodium were not evaluated as th
Page 465 and 466:
preliminary report 1997). Sample lo
Page 467 and 468:
time frame. The concentration of ea
Page 469 and 470:
5.4.2.4 Waste Rock Piies Seep sampl
Page 471 and 472:
Seep data were compared to MTCA gro
Page 473 and 474:
The data for seeps associated with
Page 475 and 476:
in wells TP1- 1A. TPl-2A, TPI-3A, T
Page 477 and 478:
5.4.2.8 Lucerne Well The well at th
Page 479 and 480:
Ninemile Creek) with a correspondin
Page 482 and 483:
During the mine reclamation activit
Page 484 and 485:
TABLE 5.0-1 KM OF SITE FEATURES 8 M
Page 486 and 487:
Page 488 and 489:
Page 490 and 491:
TABLE 5.2-1 SUMMARY OF RI SOlL ANAL
Page 492 and 493:
TABLE 5.2-1 SUMMARY OF Rl SOIL ANAL
Page 494 and 495:
TABLE 5.23 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SO
Page 496 and 497:
TABLE 5.24 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL TA
Page 498 and 499:
TABLE 5.2-5 SUMMARY OF RI TAILINGS
Page 500 and 501:
TABLE 5.2-6 POTENTIAL COMPOUNDS OF
Page 502 and 503:
TABLE 5.51 SURFACE WATER AREA BACKG
Page 504 and 505:
. . .. . . . .....-a .---.-I--u,. C
Page 506 and 507:
TABLE 5.3-2 Aluminum Data Points, B
Page 508 and 509:
TABLE 5.34 Beryllium Data Points. B
Page 510 and 511:
TABLE 5.3-6 Chromium Data Points. B
Page 512 and 513:
TABLE 5.34 lron Data Points. Backgr
Page 514 and 515:
TABLE 5.3-10 Magnesium Data Points,
Page 516 and 517:
TABLE 5.3-12 Selenium Data Points,
Page 518 and 519:
TABLE 5.3-14 Zinc Data Points, Back
Page 520 and 521:
TABLE 5.3-16 Statistical Summary -F
Page 522 and 523:
TABLE 5.3-18 SUMMARY OF RI SURFACE
Page 524 and 525:
h:\holden\drafi final nrpt\SS\TaMes
Page 526 and 527:
TmLE 5.240 STATION RG2 AND P ROXW S
Page 529 and 530:
TABLE 5.3-20 h:\holden\draft final
Page 531:
TPBLE 5.3-21 STATION RCJ AHD PROXBS
Page 534 and 535:
TABLE 5.3-21 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QU
Page 536 and 537:
TABLE 5.3-24 SUMMARY OF SURFACE WAT
Page 538 and 539:
h V~olden\draR final nrpt\S-5\Table
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
Page 544 and 545:
TABLE 5.3-28 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QU
Page 546 and 547:
TABLE 5.529 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QUA
Page 548 and 549:
TABLE 5.3-30 SUMMARY OF RI PORTAL D
Page 550 and 551:
TABLE 5.W1 SUMMPRY OF HISTORICAL WA
Page 552:
TABLE 5.592 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QUA
Page 556 and 557:
TABLE 5.3-35 TABLE 5.355 SUMMARY OF
Page 558 and 559:
TABLE 5.358 SUMMARY OF WATER QUALIT
Page 560 and 561:
n.\holden\draR Rnal r1rpt\S-5\tabIe
Page 562 and 563:
TABLE 5.4-1 SUMMARY OF RI GROUNDWAT
Page 564 and 565:
TABLE 5.4-1 SUMMARY OF Rl GROUNDWAT
Page 566 and 567:
TABLE 5.4-2 SUMMARY OF RI SEEPAGE W
Page 568 and 569:
TABLE 5.4-2 SUMMARY OF R1 SEEPAGE W
Page 570 and 571:
TABLE 5.4-2 SUMHAW OF RI SEEPAGE WA
Page 572 and 573:
TABLE 5.43 HlSTORlCAL SUMMARY OF GR
Page 574 and 575:
TABLE 5.4-4 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF S
Page 576 and 577:
TABLE 5.44 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SE
Page 578 and 579:
TABLE 5.44 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF MI
Page 580 and 581:
TABLE 5.5-1 SUMWRY Of HISlORlcbl DA
Page 582 and 583:
TABLE 5.5-2 SUMMARY OF FALL 1998 SE
Page 584 and 585:
TABLE 5.61 SUWAARY OF 1997 FERRICRE
Page 586 and 587:
D.7 D.8 SOURCE: Base map informatio
Page 588:
Scale in Feet Irene Lode Figure 5.2
Page 593 and 594:
i i Wilderness i I i I i I P.J i i
Page 595 and 596:
Date -+-- Discharge (cfs) 4'- ~lumi
Page 597 and 598:
DAMES & MOORE A oAW 6 MooRE GROUP C
Page 599 and 600:
-+- pischarge (cfs) I t hardness 1
Page 601 and 602:
-I Job NO. 17693-005-01 9 .----. Ma
Page 603 and 604:
160 -.- May-Zinc --- September-Zinc
Page 606:
SOURCE: Base map infomtim horn USFS
Page 609:
D.8 D. 9 E.0 ..... E.2 E.3 E.4 a D.
Page 613 and 614:
SOURCE. Base map information frwn U
Page 620:
SOURCE: Base map inlomtim frwn USFS
Page 631:
SOURCE: Base map inlbrmatim from US
Page 636 and 637:
Approximate Scale in Feet DAMES & M
Page 638 and 639:
LEGEND -- -A O Ferr~crete, floccule
Page 640 and 641:
Subsection 6.4 presents general Sit
Page 642 and 643:
.LXOdW RI WNId W@Md 11:V:6661 'LZ A
Page 644 and 645:
snowmelt on the adjacent valley slo
Page 646 and 647:
1XCH3d Ill I V N U ~ I l:O!6661 b ~
Page 648 and 649:
63.1.1 Sulfide Mineral Oxidation Th
Page 650 and 651:
a IXOdIM Ill WW UVXCI%M 11:P!6661 '
Page 652 and 653:
Co-precipitation. Sorption. 633.1 D
Page 654 and 655:
Eh Control on Preeipitation/Dissoln
Page 657 and 658:
6.4.1 Evidence of Iron Sulfide Mine
Page 659 and 660:
to the underground mine workings, r
Page 661 and 662:
The pH to copper relationship (Figu
Page 663 and 664:
' 6.5.1 Air and Water Movement Asso
Page 665 and 666:
not originating h m the underground
Page 667 and 668:
sulfate discharged from the portal
Page 669 and 670:
decreases also, aiding in the disso
Page 671 and 672:
West Waste Rock Pie, Mill Building,
Page 673 and 674:
Mixing of Seeps with Railroad Creek
Page 675 and 676:
through diffusion. This is indicate
Page 677 and 678:
MINTEQA2 indicates that the seep wa
Page 679 and 680:
In order to provide comparative flo
Page 681 and 682:
main source of zinc load (82 percen
Page 683 and 684:
source areas was estimated from flo
Page 685 and 686:
Monitoring of seeps from drill hole
Page 687 and 688:
(i.e., portal drainage) for cadmium
Page 689 and 690:
Upstream of the tailings piles, sig
Page 691 and 692:
Source controls reflect the differe
Page 693 and 694:
a. H:\Holden\Draft TABLE 6.0-1 KEY
Page 695 and 696:
Page 697 and 698:
Page 699:
i V'6 SZP C0'0 pea? t-38~0 sfiw i18
Page 702 and 703:
Table 6.64 Loadlng Calculations - A
Page 704 and 705:
Job NO. 17693-005-01 9 Draft Final
Page 707 and 708:
1500 Ventilator Portal (Elev. 3454)
Page 709 and 710:
Job NO. 17693-005-019 - - - - LEGEN
Page 711 and 712:
SOURCE: SRK Oxidant I 2+ H+ SO 2+ +
Page 713:
SOURCE: SRK DWVES & MOORE A oAW 6 M
Page 716:
SOURCE: SRK Trace elements are co-p
Page 719 and 720:
J O NO. ~ 17693-005-019 10000 -f 0
Page 721 and 722:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 6 MOORE GROUP
Page 723 and 724:
10 -1: - I e@ i ! 1 I 1 -1 i --- I
Page 725 and 726:
I * pi-- Tailings Pile 1 Tailings P
Page 728 and 729:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES a MOORE GROUP
Page 730 and 731:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 6 MOORE GROUP
Page 732 and 733:
SOURCES: SRK H Flushing Reduced Som
Page 734 and 735:
SOURCES: SRK 'nfi""On Limited Air M
Page 736 and 737:
Figure 6.5-5 DAMES & MOORE 1997 POR
Page 739 and 740:
Page 741 and 742:
SOURCE: SRK Oxidation limit Mn++ Fe
Page 743:
Direct Precipitation IXMES & MOORE
Page 746 and 747:
Infiltration of Snowmelt and Interm
Page 748 and 749:
Notes: Water Runon and Direct Preci
Page 750 and 751:
Surface Water Runon and Direct Prec
Page 752 and 753:
SOURCE: SRK L DAMES ,& MOORE A DAME
Page 754 and 755:
SOURCE: SRK 10 -i DAMES & MOORE + H
Page 756 and 757:
(* 6.0 TRANSPORT AND FATE OF COMPOU
Page 758 and 759:
1 I .J Quartz-rich layeis of 40 per
Page 760 and 761:
Crystalline crusts were observed in
Page 762 and 763:
I ( 4. -.- h .*, Evidence of signif
Page 764 and 765:
Predicted saturation indices (SI) f
Page 766 and 767:
Another iron sulfide mineral at the
Page 768 and 769:
. .. . .I.- ..9 6 If water flow is
Page 770 and 771:
pH Control on Precipitation~Dissolu
Page 772 and 773:
summer. Efflorescence occurs when w
Page 774 and 775:
6.4.1 Evidence of Iron Sulfide Mine
Page 776 and 777:
to the underground mine workings, r
Page 778 and 779:
The pH to copper relationship (Figu
Page 780 and 781:
6.5.1 Air and Water Movement Associ
Page 782 and 783:
.._/ not originating from the under
Page 784 and 785:
,' sulfate discharged from the port
Page 786 and 787:
decreases also, aiding in the disso
Page 788 and 789:
.: ._..I $ . .,'. Seasonal s , - We
Page 790 and 791:
. ., Miring of Seeps with Railroad
Page 792 and 793:
through diffusion. This is indicate
Page 794 and 795:
MlNTEQA2 indicates that the seep wa
Page 796 and 797:
In order to. provide comparative fl
Page 798 and 799:
main source of zinc load (82 percen
Page 800 and 801:
,:..' -- . source areas was estimat
Page 802 and 803:
Monitoring of seeps from drill hole
Page 804 and 805:
,' .... . control and buffering by
Page 806 and 807:
, ; . ..' , . .. .. -. . ..&. .< .
Page 808 and 809:
-- (i,e., portal drainage) for cadm
Page 810 and 811:
Page 812 and 813:
Page 814 and 815:
Page 816 and 817:
T.bk abi Losding WNlatlons - R d W
Page 818 and 819:
TABLE 6.6-3 LOADING CALCULATIONS -
Page 820 and 821:
J O NO. ~ 17693-005-019 Draft Final
Page 824 and 825:
Approximate -1 % Grade for 15OPLeve
Page 826 and 827:
LEGEND SP14 Seep sample location P-
Page 828 and 829:
Oxidant I ZnS H20 (transport mechan
Page 830:
Figure 6.3-4a I SOURCE: SRK Figure
Page 835 and 836:
0 RC 1 0 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC5 Tail
Page 837 and 838:
0 RC 1 0 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC5 Tail
Page 839 and 840:
0 RC 1 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC5 Tailin
Page 841 and 842:
1000 -: 0 RC 1 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC
Page 843:
P A DAMES MOORE GROUP COMPANY ' + 0
Page 846 and 847: I ARC7 XRC 2 I I ORC5. Tailings Pil
Page 848 and 849: ORC 1 ORC 4 ARC 7 XRC2 ORC 5 Tailin
Page 850: SOURCES: SRK Northwest Geophpysrcal
Page 853 and 854: Date Figure 6.5-5 DAMES & MOORE 199
Page 855 and 856: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 857 and 858: 0 Acidity Addition Water Runon end
Page 859: SOURCE: SRK Oxidation limit Mn++ Fe
Page 862 and 863: In~Vtratim to Grwndwater . Base of
Page 864: Note: Some flow lost into plane of
Page 868: Approximate Scale in Feet SOURCE: O
Page 871 and 872: SOURCE: SRK 1 L 'i +- Holden P-5 (B
Page 873 and 874: 7.0 BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Both a
Page 875 and 876: 7.1.1.2 Site-Specific Human Health
Page 877 and 878: Surface Water Historic and 1997-199
Page 879 and 880: environment. IHSs were selected for
Page 881 and 882: Railroad Creek can be utilized by v
Page 883 and 884: Exposure Routes expected to be redu
Page 885 and 886: and the USFS guard station. Holden
Page 887 and 888: No Method A levels are available fo
Page 889 and 890: 7.133 Screening Level Evaluation of
Page 891 and 892: they are not expected to present an
Page 893 and 894: Sediment Railroad Creek and Site Hi
Page 895: the ventilator portal drainage is n
Page 899 and 900: Selection of.Target Risk and Hazard
Page 901 and 902: Noncarcinogens: Inhalation of Air w
Page 903 and 904: where: PEF = Particulate emission f
Page 905 and 906: arsenic in the USFS guard station s
Page 907 and 908: Use of toxicity criteria (CPFs and
Page 909 and 910: 7.1.5.4 Surface Water and Fish Surf
Page 911 and 912: identify dismbutions of compounds o
Page 913 and 914: most abundant species in Railroad C
Page 915 and 916: mechanisms, PCOCs originating from
Page 917 and 918: copper, lead, and zinc is shown in
Page 919 and 920: Measurement Endpoints Measurement e
Page 921 and 922: to the extrapolation to low hardnes
Page 923 and 924: concentration that contains the bio
Page 925 and 926: Lupinus bicolor, and Trijolium praf
Page 927 and 928: Although certain benthic invertebra
Page 929 and 930: estimated from the available liver
Page 931 and 932: of between a low of 34 ha. for does
Page 933 and 934: Little Brown Bat The little brown b
Page 935 and 936: Since none of the UCL concentration
Page 937 and 938: , Hazard quotients for osprey consu
Page 939 and 940: appropriate metric for protection o
Page 941 and 942: Table 7.2.4-1 1A shows that red-tai
Page 943 and 944: 7.2.5 SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY Limita
Page 945 and 946: laboratory studies to field exposur
Page 947 and 948:
I I tailings piles difficult. Likew
Page 949 and 950:
other mine sites where plants &re s
Page 951 and 952:
TABLE 7.0-1 . KEY OF SITE FEATURES
Page 953 and 954:
Page 955 and 956:
Page 957 and 958:
' TABLE 7.18 STATISTICAL ANALYSJS A
Page 959 and 960:
TABLE 7.14 STAnSTlCAL EVALUATION AN
Page 961 and 962:
TABLE 7.14 STATISTICAL EVALUATION A
Page 963 and 964:
TABLE 7.14 STATISTICAL EVALUATION A
Page 965 and 966:
TABLE 7.14 COMPARISON OF SEDIMENTAR
Page 967 and 968:
H:Wolden\Drafl final ri rpt\S-7\Hhr
Page 969 and 970:
TABLE 7.14 SURFACE WATER AREA BACKG
Page 971 and 972:
H.Wolden\drafl final rirpt\S-7WhraU
Page 973 and 974:
TABLE 7.1-E SURFACE WATER AREA BACK
Page 975:
TABLE T.1-F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AN
Page 978 and 979:
TABLE 7.1 -F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A
Page 980:
H.Wolden\dratl hnal rirpnsrpns7Whra
Page 983 and 984:
TABLE 7.10 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND
Page 985 and 986:
Page 987 and 988:
TABLE 7.144 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AN
Page 989 and 990:
Page 991 and 992:
TABLE 7.144 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AN
Page 993 and 994:
Xluo sanlm pawlap uo paseq aJe suo!
Page 995 and 996:
TABLE 7.14 STAllSllCM ANALYSIS AND
Page 997 and 998:
TABLE 7.1 J MSTORKM AJR MONITORING
Page 999 and 1000:
TABLE 7.1-1 AREA AND NATURAL BACKGR
Page 1002 and 1003:
TABLE 7.1-4 TOXICITY CRITERIA AND B
Page 1004 and 1005:
TABLE 7.14 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING O
Page 1006 and 1007:
TABLE 7.14 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING O
Page 1008 and 1009:
TABLE 7.1-10 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING
Page 1011 and 1012:
Page 1013 and 1014:
TABLE 7.1-15 HUMN HEALTH SCREENING
Page 1015 and 1016:
Page 1017 and 1018:
Page 1019 and 1020:
TABLE 7.1 -21 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENIN
Page 1021 and 1022:
Page 1023 and 1024:
Page 1025 and 1026:
Page 1027 and 1028:
TABLE 7.1-29 HUMANHEALTHSCREENINGOF
Page 1029:
Page 1032 and 1033:
Page 1034 and 1035:
TABLE 7.1-36 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND
Page 1036 and 1037:
TABLE 7.1 -38 TOXICITY CRITERIA AND
Page 1038 and 1039:
TABLE 7.1.40 SITE-SPECIFIC METHOD C
Page 1040 and 1041:
TABLE 7.142 CALCUIATION OF CANCER R
Page 1042 and 1043:
Constituent Aluminum Arsenic Acute
Page 1044 and 1045:
Constituent Chromium Copper Acute T
Page 1046 and 1047:
Constituent Selenium Zinc Gasoline
Page 1048 and 1049:
TABLE 7.2.2-1A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1050 and 1051:
H.\Holden\Draft final ri rpt\S_7\ec
Page 1052 and 1053:
TABLE 7.2.2-162 STATISnCAL ANALYSIS
Page 1054 and 1055:
TABLE 7.2.2-1C COMPARISON OF TOTAL
Page 1056 and 1057:
TABLE 7.2.2-1C =b COMPARISON OF SED
Page 1058 and 1059:
'a TABLE I 7.2.2-1D SUMMARY OF RI F
Page 1060 and 1061:
TABLE 7.2.2-1E STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1062 and 1063:
TABLE 7.2.2-1F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1064 and 1065:
Page 1066 and 1067:
Page 1068 and 1069:
TABLE 7.22-1G STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1070 and 1071:
TABLE 7.22-10 STAT~SMAL ANALYSIS AN
Page 1072 and 1073:
- - -. TABLE 7.2.2-1H STATISTICAL A
Page 1074 and 1075:
TABLE 7.2.2-1H STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1076 and 1077:
TABLE 7.2.2-1 H STATISTICAL ANALYSI
Page 1078 and 1079:
TABLE 7.2.2-1H STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1080 and 1081:
TABLE 7.2.2-2 (CONTINUED) SPECIES O
Page 1082 and 1083:
TABLE 7.2.2-4 SUMMARY OF REPRESENTA
Page 1084 and 1085:
TABLE 7.2.3-1B RESULTS OF PEER-REVI
Page 1086 and 1087:
TABLE 7.2.3-2B RESULTS OF PEER-REVI
Page 1088 and 1089:
TABLE 7.2.3-3B SOIL CONCENTRATIONS
Page 1090 and 1091:
, TABLE 7.2.3-4B TOXICITY REFERENCE
Page 1092 and 1093:
" Metal C Atscnic Cadmium Copper Le
Page 1094 and 1095:
TABLE 7.2.3-8 DOSES TO OSPREY CONSU
Page 1096 and 1097:
Biota Plants Cd Cu Pb Zn Earthworms
Page 1098 and 1099:
TABLE 7.2.3-12 DOSES TO MULE DEER H
Page 1100 and 1101:
TABLE 7.2.3-14 DOSES TO MINK CONSUM
Page 1102 and 1103:
TABLE 7.2.3-16 DOSES TO RED-TAILED
Page 1104 and 1105:
TABLE 7.2.3-18 DOSES TO BAT HOLDEN
Page 1106 and 1107:
TABLE 7.2.4-2a HAZARD QUOTIENTS FOR
Page 1108 and 1109:
TABLE 7.2.4-2D a HAZARD QUOTIENTS F
Page 1110 and 1111:
TABLE 7.2.4-4 HAZARD QUOTIENTS FOR
Page 1112 and 1113:
Page 1114 and 1115:
Page 1116 and 1117:
TABLE 7.2.4-10a HAZARD QUOTIENTS FO
Page 1118 and 1119:
TABLE 7.2.4-12a HAZARD QUOTIENTS FO
Page 1120 and 1121:
TABLE 7.2.4-14 HAZARD QUOTIENTS FOR
Page 1122 and 1123:
Figure 7.0-2 HDA~VE~~LMOORE RAILROA
Page 1124 and 1125:
I SOURCE RELEASE EXPOSURE . MECHANI
Page 1126 and 1127:
MEDIA FIGURE 7.1-3 FLOW CHART ILLUS
Page 1128 and 1129:
I I 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.0 DISCUSSION
Page 1130 and 1131:
8.2.2 Geology 8.2.2.1 Railroad Cree
Page 1132 and 1133:
The bedrock in the mine has been ma
Page 1134 and 1135:
Railroad Creek and Copper Creek. Th
Page 1136 and 1137:
where Railroad Creek flows directly
Page 1138 and 1139:
A 500-year event was not analyzed,
Page 1140 and 1141:
i flow associated with two seeps ad
Page 1142 and 1143:
Western Portion of Site Undermound
Page 1144 and 1145:
native soil is of higher permeabili
Page 1146 and 1147:
Macroinvertebrate sampling included
Page 1148 and 1149:
Above Tenmile Creek Confluence (RC-
Page 1150 and 1151:
Reference Reaches - Stehekin River
Page 1152 and 1153:
3 during the 1997 investigation ind
Page 1154 and 1155:
Subsurface Soils Cadmium, copper, a
Page 1156 and 1157:
Station' RC-4 RC-7 RC-2 RC-5 RC-10
Page 1158 and 1159:
8.3.4.1 Western Portion of Site Dur
Page 1160 and 1161:
0 mine, Honeymoon Heights, the wast
Page 1162 and 1163:
I . During The water from the west
Page 1164 and 1165:
a The Copper Creek diversion accoun
Page 1166 and 1167:
8.5.2.1 Trout An intem~ediate poten
Page 1168 and 1169:
i SOURCE: Walten et al., 1992 USGS
Page 1170 and 1171:
Page 1172 and 1173:
NOTE: This cross section is general
Page 1174 and 1175:
D.7 D. 8 D. 9 E.0 SOURCE: Base map
Page 1176 and 1177:
9.2.2 Site Surface WaterIGroundwate
Page 1178 and 1179:
9.2.4.1 Portal Drainage The chemica
Page 1180 and 1181:
Groundwater discharge from the tail
Page 1182 and 1183:
The combined results of the ERA and
Page 1184 and 1185:
9.2.11 . Winston Home Sites Fuel St
Page 1186 and 1187:
SOURCE: USGS Topographic Map, State
Page 1189 and 1190:
Page 1191 and 1192:
10.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE The, schedule
Page 1193 and 1194:
I ATSDR. 1990. Toxicological profil
Page 1195 and 1196:
Dames & Moore, 1998b. Phase I11 Rem
Page 1197 and 1198:
Ebbutt,%F. 1956. Letter Report to V
Page 1199 and 1200:
';i 1 Products, Shale-oils and Soot
Page 1201 and 1202:
Leland, H.V. and J.L. Carter. 1984.
Page 1203 and 1204:
I Pacific Northwest Laboratory. 199
Page 1205 and 1206:
Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M. and Arango
Page 1207 and 1208:
U.S. EnvirOnmcntal Protection Agenc
Page 1209 and 1210:
U.S.n.>.,. .F(zxli,st S::a;ice.. 19
Page 1211:
l#e~ehat~ihi& ~ati'onsi '~ol'c!en.~
Page 1214 and 1215:
7 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Subjec
Page 1216 and 1217:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1218 and 1219:
Page 1220 and 1221:
G CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD WHITE COP
Page 1222 and 1223:
June 15, 1998 Surface Water, May 19
Page 1224 and 1225:
Page 1226 and 1227:
Page 1228 and 1229:
Page 1230 and 1231:
I INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TO
Page 1232 and 1233:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Synp
Page 1234 and 1235:
Page 1236 and 1237:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTA
Page 1238 and 1239:
- INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1240 and 1241:
Page 1242 and 1243:
Page 1244 and 1245:
Page 1246 and 1247:
Page 1248 and 1249:
TOTAL METALS Lab Sample ID: W219AH
Page 1250 and 1251:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - DI
Page 1252 and 1253:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DISS
Page 1254 and 1255:
INORGANICS 'ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sam
Page 1256 and 1257:
Page 1258 and 1259:
Page 1260 and 1261:
Page 1262 and 1263:
Page 1264 and 1265:
Page 1266 and 1267:
Page 1268 and 1269:
Page 1270 and 1271:
Page 1272 and 1273:
Page 1274 and 1275:
IKOXGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab
Page 1276 and 1277:
Final Report Laboratory Analysis of
Page 1278 and 1279:
Page 1280 and 1281:
QA Report - Method Blank Analyeis Q
Page 1282 and 1283:
QA Report - Matrix Spike/~atrix Spi
Page 1284 and 1285:
QA Report - Standard Reference Mate
Page 1286 and 1287:
@ TOTAL GASOLINE RANGE HYDROCARBONS
Page 1288 and 1289:
TOTAL DIESEL RANGE HYDROCARBONS WA
Page 1290 and 1291:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD , > >~LINQU
Page 1292 and 1293:
Page 1294 and 1295:
Sample No: RC-2 Lab .Sample ID: W21
Page 1296 and 1297:
@ QA Report - Replicate Analysis QC
Page 1298 and 1299:
QA Report - Laboratory Control Samp
Page 1300 and 1301:
TOTAL GASOLINE RANGE HYDROCARBONS w
Page 1302 and 1303:
TOTAL DIESEL RANGE HYDROCARBONS TPH
Page 1304 and 1305:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD WHITE COPY-
Page 1306 and 1307:
Page 1308 and 1309:
June 8,1998 Seep and Portal, May 19
Page 1310 and 1311:
June 8, 1998 Seep and Portal, May 1
Page 1312 and 1313:
1 DISSOLVED METALS Lab Sample ID: W
Page 1314 and 1315:
Page 1316 and 1317:
Page 1318 and 1319:
Page 1320 and 1321:
Page 1322 and 1323:
Page 1324 and 1325:
I a INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page 1326 and 1327:
Page 1328 and 1329:
Page 1330 and 1331:
.I.V. Lots 869-6 and 867-12 Lab Sam
Page 1332 and 1333:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DISS
Page 1334 and 1335:
TOTAL METALS Lab Sample ID: W222C L
Page 1336 and 1337:
METALS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DISSOLVE
Page 1338 and 1339:
Sample No: P-1 Lab Sample ID: W222A
Page 1340 and 1341:
Sample No: VP-1 Lab Sample ID: W222
Page 1342 and 1343:
Page 1344 and 1345:
Final Report Laboratcrf Analysis of
Page 1346 and 1347:
Final Report Laboratory Analysie of
Page 1348 and 1349:
4D QA Report - Replicate Analysis Q
Page 1350 and 1351:
e QA Report - Laboratory Control Sa
Page 1352 and 1353:
Sample No: SP-27 Lab Sample ID: W26
Page 1354 and 1355:
QC Report No: W264-Dames & Moore Ma
Page 1356 and 1357:
QA Report - Standard Reference Mate
Page 1358 and 1359:
Page 1360 and 1361:
a,, MEMORANDUM Date: June 8,1998 To
Page 1362 and 1363:
June 8, 1998 Equipment Blank, May 1
Page 1364 and 1365:
Page 1366 and 1367:
Page 1368 and 1369:
MEMORANDUM Date: June 15,1998 To: R
Page 1370 and 1371:
. June 15,1998 Low Level Lead, May
Page 1372 and 1373:
" QC Summary for Dames and Moore Re
Page 1374 and 1375:
I fa I / - Froi~tler Geosciences In
Page 1376 and 1377:
Date: To: From: Subject: June 25, 1
Page 1378 and 1379:
June 25, 1998 Ventilator Portal, Ju
Page 1380 and 1381:
Page 1382 and 1383:
. Lab ' INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SH
Page 1384 and 1385:
Page 1386 and 1387:
December 1 1, 1998 Sediment Data, F
Page 1388 and 1389:
December 1 1, 1998 Sediment Data, F
Page 1390 and 1391:
Page 1392 and 1393:
Page 1394 and 1395:
Page 1396 and 1397:
' INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEW Sam
Page 1398 and 1399:
Page 1400 and 1401:
e. INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET S
Page 1402 and 1403:
Page 1404 and 1405:
Page 1406 and 1407:
Page 1408 and 1409:
INORQANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1410 and 1411:
@ INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOT
Page 1412 and 1413:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHBBT Samp
Page 1414 and 1415:
Page 1416 and 1417:
a Final Report Laboratory Analysis
Page 1418 and 1419:
0 Final Report Laboratory Analysie
Page 1420 and 1421:
a - Final Report Laboratory Analyei
Page 1422 and 1423:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeis of
Page 1424 and 1425:
a; Organic 3. - ., Final Report Lab
Page 1426 and 1427:
-. Final Report Laboratory Analysis
Page 1428 and 1429:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeis of
Page 1430 and 1431:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeie of
Page 1432 and 1433:
, @: Final Report Laboratory Analys
Page 1434 and 1435:
: QA Report - Method Blank Analyeie
Page 1436 and 1437:
QA Report - Matrix Spikq/Matrix Spi
Page 1438 and 1439:
Data Release Authorized: Reported:
Page 1440 and 1441:
Rosa Environmental and ~eechnlcal L
Page 1442 and 1443:
ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL L
Page 1444 and 1445:
4 ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL
Page 1446 and 1447:
Page 1448 and 1449:
f ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL
Page 1450 and 1451:
Page 1452 and 1453:
Page 1454 and 1455:
ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL 8 GEOTECHNICAL L
Page 1456 and 1457:
-1m , ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL 8 GEOTECHN
Page 1458 and 1459:
ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL.& GEOTECHNICAL L
Page 1460 and 1461:
-. JII I I ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEO
Page 1462 and 1463:
Matrlx I 1 Chain of Custody Record
Page 1464 and 1465:
main ot ~ustody Record Lake Washing
Page 1466 and 1467:
Chain of Custody Record 5 Parametrl
Page 1468 and 1469:
July 2, 1999 Sediment Data, Fall 19
Page 1470 and 1471:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SKBBT Samp
Page 1472 and 1473:
MEMORANDUM Date: December 8, 1998 T
Page 1474 and 1475:
1 Dccember 8, 1998 Background Soil
Page 1476 and 1477:
I INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1478 and 1479:
* INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1480 and 1481:
Page 1482 and 1483:
a , INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page 1484 and 1485:
' @, INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page 1486 and 1487:
Page 1488 and 1489:
Page 1490 and 1491:
Page 1492 and 1493:
Page 1494 and 1495:
0 INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1496 and 1497:
0 INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1498 and 1499:
Page 1500 and 1501:
' 0 INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page 1502 and 1503:
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ' TOT
Page 1505 and 1506:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD >*" WHITE C
Page 1507 and 1508:
December 8, 1998 Lagoon Soil Sample
Page 1509 and 1510:
December 8, 1998 Lagoon Soil sample
Page 1511 and 1512:
Page 1513 and 1514:
Page 1515 and 1516:
Page 1517 and 1518:
Page 1519 and 1520:
Page 1521 and 1522:
Page 1523 and 1524:
Page 1525 and 1526:
Page 1527 and 1528:
Page 1529 and 1530:
Page 1531 and 1532:
DAMES & MOORE . A DAMES a MOORE GRo
Page 1533 and 1534:
G:\WPDATA\OOS\REPORTSWOLDEN-2WTable
Page 1535:
lnlilling - Emer qpqwktc a&r&iax fm
Page 1539 and 1540:
ROCK SRUCTURAL DATA FIELDSHEET JOB
Page 1541 and 1542:
; Comparisons RC-1' RC-4" IogRC-1'
Page 1543 and 1544:
G:\WPDATA\OOJ\REPORTSWOLDEN-ZWTable
Page 1545 and 1546:
' AXA WSECTA Capni idee Despaxia au
Page 1547 and 1548:
WCROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: DA
Page 1549 and 1550:
'MA Capni idae Dormria baunerni Meg
Page 1551 and 1552:
MCROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: DA
Page 1553 and 1554:
UCROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: DA
Page 1555 and 1556:
MACROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: D
Page 1557 and 1558:
m TR'CHOPTEiU lUCROlNVERTEBRATE DEY
Page 1559 and 1560:
Dugesfa sp. Polycelis cormeta Mid.
Page 1561 and 1562:
MACROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: O
Page 1563 and 1564:
Vial Number Order Taxa Site E-8 Eph
Page 1565 and 1566:
Slide Number DM 1097- 1 DM 1097- 1
Page 1567:
@ August 11,1997 Linda Krippner Dam
show all

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?