13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

unoff into the lagoon (SP-16). Observations of the surface of the tailings piles and slopes within the Site<br />

area indicate that there is little evidence of rilling or any overland runoff from the tailings piles. This<br />

observation would include that infiltration to the tailings piles is more likely to occur as compared to<br />

runoff. The only area where rilling from overland runoff was observed was in windblown tailings piles<br />

and soils west of tailings pile 1, between the tailings piles, and the Copper Creek diversion in the area<br />

immediately down slope of the access road, and in the windblown tailings and soils within the Copper<br />

Creek channel and banks between tailings piles 1 and 2. Runoff from the west side of tailings pile 1<br />

would flow into the SP-19 ditch or into the Copper Creek diversion channel, and runoff within the Copper<br />

Creek channel would flow directly into Copper Creek.<br />

Runon from upgradient sources during melt and heavy rainfall would tend to be routed in existing drainages<br />

either to Copper Creek, the Copper Creek diversion, directly into Railroad Creek, or into the SP-16 lagoon;<br />

the water which collects in the lagoon appears to infiltrate into the subsurface soils. Some of the runon<br />

collected in the ditches and lower-lying areas on the surfaces of the tailings likely infiltrate into the<br />

subsurface. The amount of infiltration resulting from run-on into the tailings is not expected to be large<br />

because of the relatively small areas of infiltration and the relatively low permeabilities measured in<br />

surfaces of the tailings historically by others (Hart Crowser, 1975) and <strong>Dames</strong> & <strong>Moore</strong> during the RI.<br />

Runoff from the tailings piles and surrounding areas would be generated when either snowmelt or rainfall<br />

exceeds the infiltration and holding capacity of the surface soils. The holding capacity is a function of the<br />

slope and storage capacity or condition of the surface. Surfaces that are highly irregular and include a<br />

porous material or dense leaf litter, tend to hold more water within interstices and in puddles. Smooth<br />

surfaces made up of uniform materials will generate more runoff. Surface slopes on the tailings piles are<br />

relatively flat and in some areas shallow ponds develop (as observed on the southern portion of tailings pile<br />

2 during the May 1997 and 1998 sampling events). Additionally, loose gravel surfacing on the piles allows<br />

for water to be stored within the surface soils, encouraging infiltration and decreasing runoff potential.<br />

Surrounding soils on slopes are steeper; however, they include leaf litter and organic forest soils that would<br />

store water and inhibit the generation of runoff. Neither the surface conditions on the tailings piles or on<br />

surrounding areas are conducive to creating runoff and runon to adjacent areas.<br />

Steep tailings pile slopes, areas that are not capped by the loose gravel, and compacted access road surfaces<br />

are more likely to generate runoff and runon during snowmelt and during large rainfall events. Limited<br />

rilling was observed during the RI in several of these areas. Runoff is also generated from areas that<br />

become saturated and are sloped. These saturated areas occur adjacent to drainages and where snow or<br />

rainfall accumulates. The saturated areas appeared to occur adjacent to drainage ditches on the upslope side<br />

of the tailings piles and in lowland areas on the banks of Railroad Creek.<br />

The infiltration potential of the tailings material beneath the gravel cap has been estimated to be on the order<br />

of 4 to greater than 20 inches per day under saturated conditions (see Section 4.4). The saturated infiltration<br />

capacity, under most conditions, represents the lowest potential infiltration rate. Exceptions to this occur<br />

when extremely dry soil repels water due to surface tension of the dry dust. However, dryness under most<br />

conditions will accelerate infiltration because of negative pressure, heads in the soil. Comparing the<br />

saturated infiltration capacity to expected snowmelt rates, assumed to have averaged 1.6 inches per day (50<br />

inches of water equivalent snowpack for 1997 melted over the time period April 1.6 to May 19) indicates<br />

that melt rates are generally below potential infiltration capacities of the tailings pile material. Based on<br />

G:\WPDATA\OOmEPORTSWOLDEN-2UUWd.DOC<br />

17693-005-0 19Wuly 19. <strong>1999</strong>:4:5 1 PM;DRAFr FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!