13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

they are not expected to present an unacceptable risk to receptors via the inhalation route at the<br />

concentrations present particularly given the short expected exposure period for this area.<br />

Baseball Field<br />

The results of the particulate emissions screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1 - 15. All<br />

constituents were eliminated as IHSs based on this screening. Copper. and silver did not have health-based<br />

MTCA Method A or Method B levels (due to an absence of inhalation toxicity criteria) which could be used<br />

for screening. While these constituent concentrations appear to be elevated, they are not expected to present<br />

an unacceptable risk to receptors via the inhalation route at the concentrations present particularly given the<br />

short expected exposure period for this area.<br />

Wilderness Boundary<br />

The results of the particulate emissions screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-16. All<br />

constituents were eliminated as MSs based on this screening. Copper, lead, molybdenum, silver, uranium<br />

and zinc did not have health-based MTCA Method A or Method B levels (due to an absence of inhalation<br />

toxicity criteria) which could be used for screening. While these constituent concentrations appear to be<br />

elevated, they are not expected to present an unacceptable risk to receptors via the inhalation route at the<br />

concentrations present, particularly given the short expected exposure period and extensive vegetative cover<br />

present in this area.<br />

Maintenance Yard<br />

The results of the particulate emissions screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1- 17. The<br />

sample from the storage area was not used in this screening because the location is covered and will not<br />

generate particulate emissions. All constituents were eliminated as IHSs based on this screening. Copper,<br />

lead, molybdenum, silver, and zinc did not have health-based MTCA Method A or Method B levels (due to<br />

an absence of inhalation toxicity criteria) which could be used for screening. While these constituent<br />

concentrations appear to be elevated, they are not expected to present an unacceptable risk to receptors via<br />

the inhalation route at the concentrations present, particularly given the short expected exposure period for<br />

this area.<br />

Lagoon Area<br />

The results of the particulate emissions screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-18. The<br />

only constituent selected as an IHS based on the screening was cadmium. Aluminum, copper, lead,<br />

molybdenum, silver, thallium, uranium and zinc did not have health-based MTCA Method A or Method B<br />

levels (due to an absence of inhalation toxicity criteria) which could be used for screening. While these<br />

constituent concentrations appear to be elevated, they are not expected to present an unacceptable risk to<br />

receptors via the inhalation route at the concentrations present, particularly given the ,short expected<br />

exposure period for this area.<br />

USFS Guard Station<br />

The results of the particulate emissions screening for this exposure area are presented in Table 7.1-19.<br />

Based on this screening, the only constituent selected as an IHS for this area was arsenic. Copper and lead<br />

G:\~~U)O~~\boldm-2\ri\'I-O.doc 7-19<br />

17693M)5dl9Uuly 27. <strong>1999</strong>;5:16 PMDRAFl' FINAL R1 REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!