13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

into three rather than two species. The reference collection of specimens identified is stored in 70 percent<br />

ethanol and archived in the laboratory.<br />

Fish<br />

Both electrofishing and snorkeling were employed to estimate fish populations within Railroad creek and<br />

those streams outside the Railroad Creek drainage where reference reaches were identified. Two of the<br />

"non-Railroad Creek" reference locations were located in the Glacier Peak Wilderness and North<br />

Cascades National Park, both of which are "restricted use" areas prohibiting the use of motorized vehicles<br />

or equipment. Temporary permits were obtained to allow electrofishing at these locations during the R1.<br />

In addition to providing information on fish populations within these streams. each method was<br />

conducted to compare the two methods (see Appendix J) and provide indications as to the most efficient<br />

and cost effective way to monitor fish populations inhabiting these streams.<br />

Approximately 100 meters of stream at each sampling location was identified and isolated with block nets<br />

for both electrofishing and snorkeling. Each stream segment sampled was as similar in habitat (e.g., pool:<br />

riffle ratio, substrate, gradient, etc.) as practical. The length and average width (n=10) of each site was<br />

measured and recorded and the boundaries marked. Each sampling location was photographed to<br />

document stream conditions. Snorkeling was conducted first followed immediately by electrofishing.<br />

Snorkeling was conducted by a two-person team that swam upstream through the sampling location.<br />

Each snorkeler counted fish within approximately one half of the stream width. The snorkelers<br />

communicated the number, species, and size of fish observed to a recorder standing near stream. A more<br />

detailed description of the snorkeling survey can be found in Appendix J.<br />

After the snorkeling survey was complete, a bank electrofishing unit consisting of a variable voltage<br />

pulsator (VVP) supplied by a I 10-volt generator was used to capture fish within the isolated sampling<br />

location. The VVP for the bank electrofishing unit was equipped to produce and monitor variable output<br />

(i.e., watts, amps, and voltage) to accommodate variable conditions within the river (i.e., temperature,<br />

conductivity, hardness, and total dissolved solids). The VVP output was monitored and controlled to<br />

minimize adverse effects on fish. Voltage, watts, and amperage used to capture fish were recorded at<br />

each location. Temperature and conductivity at each location was measured and recorded prior to<br />

sampling.<br />

At least two electrofishing passes were conducted at each location. The time required (effort) to complete<br />

each pass was recorded. A third pass was conducted to provide a more accurate estimate of the trout<br />

population if the number of trout (rainbow or cutthroat) collected during the first pass was less than 60<br />

percent of the total trout collected during both the first and second pass. The "60 percent" was selected as<br />

a criterion by which a sufficient number of fish were considered removed from the population during the<br />

first pass to provide a noticeable reduction in the original population. This sufficient reduction, in turn,<br />

was considered to provide a reasonable indication of the original population size. However, if the number<br />

of trout collected during the first pass was greater than 60 percent of the total trout collected during both<br />

the first and second pass, the results of the first and second pass were used to estimate population size.<br />

Using data from three passes when sampling efficiency is less than 60 percent, provided additional<br />

confidence in the population estimate.<br />

G:\wpd.ta\O05hpo~~oldcn-2~~~.doc<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 19.<strong>1999</strong>;2:07 PM:DRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!