13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.a I.<br />

Other Related Findings<br />

Comparison of Railroad Creek Locations with Respective Reference Locations<br />

Data collected for the benthic invertebrate community metrics were evaluated using the W test to<br />

determine if the data were lognormally or normally distributed. The results from these distribution fits<br />

were then utilized for statistical comparison in accordance with the pairings of Railroad Creek locations<br />

and their respective reference locations previously described. The results of the distribution fit for each<br />

pair of locations are presented in Table 4.6-2c while the statistical comparisons of the Railroad Creek<br />

location pairs with the respective reference pairs are presented in Table 4.6-2d. Because lognormal and<br />

normal fits and "no fit" conditions were encountered during the distribution fit evaluations, both<br />

parametric and nonparametric tests were used on the Railroad Creek and reference locations for the<br />

comparisons. The parametric test (independent t-test with 95 percent confidence) was performed if the<br />

reference and Railroad Creek metrics were found to be both either lognormally or normally distributed.<br />

A nonparametric test (Wilcoxin Rank Sum test with 95 percent confidence) was performed if the<br />

distribution fits from both data sets were not identical or the evaluation indicated no fit. Results of the<br />

statistical comparisons indicated that the percent dominant taxa were similar between both groups (RCl<br />

and RC-6 reference compared with RC9 and RC-7 affected and SFAC-1 and BC-1 reference compared<br />

with RC-5a and RC-10). The only other comparison indicating similarity was the ratio of shredders in the<br />

comparison of RC 1 and RC-6 reference with RC-9 and RC-7.<br />

Comparison of Species and Sampling Stations<br />

Benthic invertebrate communities in Railroad Creek at the upstream reference sites are similar to<br />

communities in other streams outside the drainage (Bridge Creek, South Fork Agnes Creek, and Company<br />

. Creek). Other sampling locations at and downstream of the Site are variously affected. The number of taxa<br />

and organisms are reduced at all stations at or downstream of the former operations. A more careful<br />

analysi$ of trophic and habitat requirements for the organisms present at the various sites indicate that the<br />

primary effect immediately downstream of the tailings piles is a reduction in habitat capability for benthic<br />

invertebrates. This conclusion is based on several factors including the following:<br />

, .<br />

• Benthic communities at the reference sites contain the hll spectrum of trophic types<br />

(scrapers, shredders, collectors, filter feeders, and predators) as well as habitat usage (free<br />

ranging, burrowers, net spinning, upper stone surface).<br />

This hll range and similar density is also found in upstream unaffected (by iron<br />

oxyhydroxide precipitate) portions of RC-9. This sampling station is downstream of the<br />

portal drainage where the portal water will be hlly mixed with Railroad Creek water and<br />

yet the upstream portion of this sampling station shows no apparent toxicological effect<br />

from that discharge. The concentration of metals of concern does not change appreciably at<br />

sampling stations downstream of RC-9.<br />

The lower portion of RC-9 (affected by iron oxyhydroxide precipitate) and all other<br />

downstream sites except RC-3 demonstrate an affected benthic community. These<br />

sampling stations (except RC-3) have communities without large free ranging predators,<br />

G:\WDATA\OOJ\REWRTSWOLDEN-2W-0.W<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 19, <strong>1999</strong>;4:Jl PM;DRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!