13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Infiltration of water from the portal drainage to the underlying alluvial aquifer may<br />

account for metals concentrations in seeps located downgradient from the portal drainage<br />

that flow into Railroad Creek or to groundwater baseflow.<br />

Iron enters RaiLroad Creek primarily by groundwater and iron loads are greater in<br />

September than May. Iron loads enter Railroad Creek downstream of the load sources<br />

(i.e., portal drainage) for cadmium, zinc and copper, which enter the creek as surface<br />

flows or seeps.<br />

Similar results were obtained in spring 1997 and 1998. Differences in absolute loadings<br />

were observed and can be attributed to differences in timing of monitoring. The 1998<br />

monitoring was conducted during the initial part of snowmelt, likely resulting in the<br />

measurement of greater loads of copper, zinc and cadmium entering Railroad Cmk.<br />

Additional source areas located at the west and east waste rock piles and the mill area are<br />

not significant loading sources to Railroad Creek. Metals loading at SP-2 1 may account for<br />

a component of unaccounted loads noted in September.<br />

6.7 COMPARISON OF THE HOLDEN MINE WITH OTHER MINE SITES<br />

This section provides case example comparisons of two other mines with characteristics similar to the<br />

Holden Mine. The examples are relatively typical of hard rock metal mines in northwestern North<br />

America and were selected on the basis of similar mine configuration, comparable waste types and<br />

leaching of similar elements. These cases illustrate that the chemical processes operating at the Holden<br />

Mine Site have been documented elsewhere, are not unique to the Holden Mine, and demonstrate that the<br />

Site does not represent extreme mine drainage conditions.<br />

6.7.1 Baker Mine<br />

-The Baker Mine is a small underground gold mine located in a sub-alpine area in north central British<br />

Columbia. Similar to the Holden Mine Site, the Baker Mine experiences winter conditions during which<br />

a snow pack forms. In June, the snow pack melts releasing large quantities of water in a few weeks.<br />

Summers are relatively warm and dry with occasional thunderstorms. The fall is wetter before snow<br />

starts to accumulate in October. The summer is shorter than at the Holden Mine Site, but the overall<br />

climatic conditions are comparable.<br />

Although the Baker Mine is much smaller than the Holden Mine, the configuration of the workings is<br />

comparable (Figure 6.7-1). Mine drainage exits from a single portal. A second portal is located 100 feet<br />

above this portal, and a small open pit is located on the slopes immediately above the mine; mine<br />

drainage does not flow from these L o workings. The mine exploited an epithermal gold vein for a few<br />

years in the early 1980s and is now being reclaimed. The immediate mine sequence contains little<br />

carbonate. Two bulkheads were installed in the portals in 1993 with the intention of flooding the mine.<br />

However, as a result of leakage around the bulkheads, holes were drilled in the bulkheads to allow water<br />

to drain freely.<br />

\\~M-SUI\VOL<br />

I\coMMoMwP\~~~~~---'L-.'-~'^.~~~ 6-46<br />

17693405-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>,4:11 PM;DRAFT FD4AL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!