Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

H.Wolden\dratl hnal rirpnsrpns7Whra\Tabhs\7-1-F.ds 7ROm9 TABLE 7.1-F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SURFACE WATER DATA FROM RAILROAD CREEK (DATA COLLECTED FROM STATION RC-2 ADJACENT TO SITE, 1991 - 1998) HOLDEN MINE RUFS DAMES 6 MOORE JOB NO. 17693.C05419 I I Parameters 1 8 Analyses S of Oeteaio?~ Maximum Conc. Minimum Conc. STATISTICAL CALCULATIONS - Approximate Range of RL Disblbubon Mean Standard Deviabon Median UCL (95%) 1 Aluminum Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Copper Imn Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Selenium Sttuer Sodium Thallium Uranium Zinc Dissolved Metals 1uglL1 Aluminum Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Copper Imn Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Molybdenum NrcM Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Uranium Zinc 9 38 72 49 71 70 38 10 17 37 70 10 31 70 12 7 72 59 38 58 58 '. 60 58 58 . 80 58 M) 58 58 9 39 59 46 53 58 34 29 W 1 40 48 18 66 36 5 11 25 45 0 7 69 0 . 2 67 49 12 58 1 42 56 3 54 48 27 51 55 4 29 40 18 0 2 55 0 5 59 0.2 79 7000 15 1900 65 0.W1 0.73 2 3 1010 N A 0.17 1700 N A 0.05 1 85 56W 1 31.1 0 04 45 32000 0.4 31 M 4JOM) 25 .61GU 380 ODOOS3 0.72 7.8 PW N A 0.1 5100 N A 2.4 8- Lognormal Neither 0.04-10 0.08-10 Lognormal None Lognormal Statistical Notes: (Statistical cakulations mre performed using Washington Department of Ecologfs MTCASlat Excel V.5 Macro (Module 2 1). downloaded from their web site.) Maximum and minimum concentralans are based an detected values only. Range of reporting limb (RL) are based on results reported as not detected. Distribmon is determined based on the MTCA stat program by analyzing the data thmugh the W-Test'or PAgostino's lest-. Where data is not lognormally nor normally distributed, the distribution is noted as'Nelthef. When approximate distribution is reported as'neither'. the manmum concentration is rewed as the 95% UCL and is presented in BOLD font. ll UCL is reported in brackets @JCL due). this indicates that the calculated resun horn MTCAStal was reported to be unusually high. The mean is an arithmetic mean it data are normally distributed or tf distribution is indiiled as 'Neither. The reported mean fcr lognormally distributed data is a lognormal mean. Sbtistical analysis was not performed on data sets where 50% or greater of the results were reported as not detected. Only maximum and minimum concentrations are reported. il applicable. For these data seh. a calculated median is based on detected values only. 0 2 2.1 60 0.21 240 2.75 0.00021 0.36 0 2 110 N A 0.04 460 N A 0 04 7 5.4 0.22 3.9 0 04 0.06 3230 0 2 0.93 20 0.06 260 1.53 0.0003 0.2 0.2 2W N A 0.07 4W . N A 0.1 10 0.2-10 0.8-10.5 10 0.1-85.5 47.5-1000 10 0.1 m 10 124-1000 0.2-1 0.04-0.2 590 0.04-1 0.04-0.4 0.7-10 20-60 14 None 0.04-10 1 - 10 6000 0.2-10 10 20.100 0.2-50 loo0 10 0.1 0.1-20 0.01-10 21x7-1000 0 2-1 0.01-0 2 590-1006 0.044 0.04-0.4 10 Page 7 of 7 Neither Lognormal Lognormal N A Lognormal Lognormal Lognormal Lognormal Neither Lognormal N A N A Lognormal N A N A Lognormal Neither N A Neither N A Lognormal NeiVier N A Lognormal Lognormal N A Neither Lognormal N A Normal Lognormal N A N A N A Lognormal N A N A Laanonnal . N A 14.4 1031 N A 601 11.97 0.12 4.32 1.97 439 N A N A 817.4 N A N A 56 31 1 NA 7.7 N A 1.56 6375 N A 40.6 2449 N A 894 23.03 N A 1.87 2 21 N A N A N A 971 NA N A 168 NA 17.8 1311 N A 267 12.53 0.03 4.66 2.15 199 N A N A 270 N A N A 39.2 136 N A 5.2 N A 6.06 4545 N A 416 7669 N A 1124 66 5 N A . 3.52 1.84 N A N A N A 728 N A N A 1141 0.2 5.0 480 0 6 540 8.80 0.025 0.71 0.5 482 N A 0 11 770 N A 0.05 30 40 0.41 5.6 0.04 0.5 4985 020 5.01 325 0.40 520 7.84 O.OW415 0.48 , 0.5 620 N A 0.BSO 775 N A 0.50 54.5 0.2 21.9 1770 15 674 15 55 (33 49) (14 96) 2.3 491 N A 0.17 88 1 N A 0.05 77.14 5600 1 31.1 0.04 2.57 32000 0.4 78.24 6693 25 6100 34.94 0.0005J 0 8q 4.78 no0 N A 0.1 1104 N A 2.4 271.21 TABLE 7.1-F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SURFACE WATER DATA FROM RC-2 (AWACENT TO SITE)
Page 1 and 2:
I DAMES & MOORE A DAMES & MOORE GRO
Page 3:
DAMES & MOORE .. A DAMES 8 MOORE GR
Page 6 and 7:
INTRODUCTION The olden Mine was ope
Page 8 and 9:
The Forest Service implemented site
Page 10 and 11:
Remainder of Year - After the sprin
Page 12 and 13:
' Water Portal Drainage quality mea
Page 14 and 15:
Groundwater discharge from the tail
Page 16 and 17:
Trout An intermediate potential ris
Page 18 and 19:
Windblown Tailings Material The ero
Page 20 and 21:
Lucerne Bar Sampling Additional sed
Page 22 and 23:
3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION METHODOL
Page 24 and 25:
... 5.3 SURFACE WATER .............
Page 26 and 27:
8.3.3 Surface Water ...............
Page 28 and 29:
Table 4.6-3A - Table. 4.6-4 - Table
Page 30 and 31:
Table 7.1-1 - Table 7.1-5 - Table 7
Page 32 and 33:
Table 7.2.4-2D - Table 7.2.4-3 - Ta
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 4.2-2 - Figure 4.2-3 - Figur
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 5.3-9 - Figure 5.3-10 - Figu
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 6.5-9 - Figure 6.5-10 - Figu
Page 40 and 41:
ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION GLOSSARY @
Page 42 and 43:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The .Holden Mine i
Page 44 and 45:
sediment reference location" includ
Page 46 and 47:
Volumes 11,111. and IV Section 4.0
Page 48 and 49:
. . . . .................. ........
Page 50 and 51:
2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The Holden Min
Page 52 and 53:
~:\wpdaca\005\rc~o~iol&n-2~i~-0.dae
Page 54 and 55:
2.5 SUMMARY OF ISSUES OF POTENTIAL
Page 56 and 57:
G:\tupdata\005\repomUloldm-t\riU-O.
Page 58 and 59:
1986 1988 1988 1989 Science Applica
Page 60 and 61:
piemmeter water samples as Service.
Page 62 and 63:
G:\~at~\00SLeporuUIoIden-2~V4.d0~ 1
Page 64 and 65:
SOURCE: Wtem et al., 1992 USGS Chda
Page 66 and 67:
3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION METHODOL
Page 68 and 69:
wilderness boundary with the intent
Page 70 and 71:
The test pits were excavated utiliz
Page 72 and 73:
were transferred to AutoCAD maps of
Page 74 and 75:
3.2.1 Streamflow Suweys Streamflow
Page 76 and 77:
Site. Samples collected for dissolv
Page 78 and 79:
' chromium, copper, iron, lead, mag
Page 80 and 81:
elevated metals based on field scre
Page 82 and 83:
Wolman pebble counts), occurrence a
Page 84 and 85:
Assessment by Mining Consultant The
Page 86 and 87:
discussions of the 1992 data have n
Page 88 and 89:
VelocityDepth - influences benthic
Page 90 and 91:
To the extent practical, electrosho
Page 92 and 93:
Proportion of individuals as top ca
Page 94 and 95:
provide adequate data to cany forwa
Page 96 and 97:
3.1 1 TASK 11 - DATA EVALUATION 3.1
Page 98 and 99:
3.11.4.2 Two-Dimensional Groundwate
Page 100 and 101:
TABLE 3.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
TABLE 3.2-1 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM FOR
Page 108 and 109:
TABLE 3.2.2 ANALYnCAL PROORAM FOR G
Page 110 and 111:
TABLE 1.24 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM FOR G
Page 112 and 113:
TABLE 3.24 ANALmCAL PROORAM FOR GRO
Page 114 and 115:
SOURCE: USGS Topographic Map, State
Page 116 and 117:
- Figure 3.0-3 DAMES & MOORE HOLDEN
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 3.1-2 DAMES & MOORE ! RI SOI
Page 121 and 122:
Fill (2) Vent (1) SOURCE: Base map
Page 123:
SOURCE: Base map information from U
Page 126 and 127:
SOURCE: WIteffi et a/., 1992 USGS C
Page 129 and 130:
DAMES & MOORE Figure 3.4-2 FLOCCULE
Page 133 and 134:
i I i .4 i ,i i i\ i '.\ i \ \ i I
Page 135 and 136:
4.1.2 Site Surface Features Referri
Page 137 and 138:
Hydroelectric Plant Electrical powe
Page 139 and 140:
Water seepage emanates, in the spri
Page 141 and 142:
'7 ~t the Site, approximately mid-w
Page 143 and 144:
system delineated by ditches and re
Page 145 and 146:
Section I-I' and shows the six tunn
Page 147 and 148:
The uppermost stopes within the min
Page 149 and 150:
make up the earth's surface. The st
Page 151 and 152:
silver, and included 34,000 tons of
Page 153 and 154:
strength was determined by Hart Cro
Page 155 and 156:
gravels are variable in thickness a
Page 157 and 158:
wetlands and adjacent to Railroad C
Page 159 and 160:
Several faults have been mapped in
Page 161 and 162:
the coefficient of Friction. Geomor
Page 163 and 164:
The groundwater levels used for the
Page 165 and 166:
Tailings pile 3 is situated near th
Page 167 and 168:
vertical extent of the underground
Page 169 and 170:
from the roof, then evaluating the
Page 171 and 172:
4.2.8 Potential Borrow Source Areas
Page 173 and 174:
for good quality riprap would neces
Page 175 and 176:
May and June, which coincide with t
Page 177 and 178:
Rating Calculations Referring to Ta
Page 179 and 180:
with little or no braiding. Upstrea
Page 181 and 182:
Discharge in Railroad Creek was mon
Page 183 and 184:
model predicted a 100-year flood at
Page 185 and 186:
The data logger, or transducer, was
Page 187 and 188:
submerged at high water levels. Flo
Page 189 and 190:
this, it is possible that the snow
Page 191 and 192:
4.3.5 Basin Average Climatic Water
Page 193 and 194:
surface erosional features provide
Page 195 and 196:
* The D50 equation is obtained from
Page 197 and 198:
effect of a 0.05-foot stage increas
Page 199 and 200:
discussed in' Section 6.8.2 of this
Page 201 and 202:
Observations During Aquatic snorkel
Page 203 and 204:
covers limited portions of the Site
Page 205 and 206:
Bedrock Bedrock underlies the entir
Page 207 and 208:
high as 0.1 to 0.2 feet per foot (F
Page 209 and 210:
Generalized Site-Wide Groundwater R
Page 211 and 212:
4.4.3.5 Groundwater Uses Groundwate
Page 213 and 214:
Reach 1 Since there are no observed
Page 215 and 216:
evaluated on the basis of judgment
Page 217 and 218:
and only started flowing afier seve
Page 219 and 220:
interceptor ditches likely carry pr
Page 221 and 222:
The inflow of groundwater in the fo
Page 223 and 224:
Accuracy The accuracy of the bedroc
Page 225 and 226:
aquifer from the portal drainage, o
Page 227 and 228:
Reference Reaches RC-10. Railroad C
Page 229 and 230:
accessed, including the RM-3 "Dan's
Page 231 and 232:
The banks are relatively nonvegetat
Page 233 and 234:
Ratio of Shredder Functional Feedin
Page 235 and 236:
without scrapers and organisms requ
Page 237 and 238:
present at RC-6, RC-I, RC-3, SFAC-I
Page 239 and 240:
and stumps with bark piles surround
Page 241 and 242:
Tailings Piles A flock of violet-gr
Page 243 and 244:
4.6.3 Threatened or Endangered Spec
Page 245 and 246:
Background Information Grizzly bear
Page 247 and 248:
anadromous populations occurring in
Page 249 and 250:
Creek drainage, they are more commo
Page 251 and 252:
R16E S7). These species include an
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
TABLE 4.1 -1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
Page 259 and 260:
Pitchblende Sericite Biotite Source
Page 261 and 262:
TABLE 4.2-2a EROSION POTENTIAL RANK
Page 263 and 264:
TABLE 4.2-4 RIP-RAP CONDITION RANKI
Page 265 and 266:
TABLE 4.24 BORROW SOURCE EVALUATION
Page 267 and 268:
TABLE 4.3-1 AVERAGE MONTHLY FLOW PE
Page 269 and 270:
TABLE 4.33 AVERAGE MONTHLY POTENTIA
Page 271 and 272:
TABLE 4.3& SURFACE WATER FIELD PARA
Page 273 and 274:
TABLE 4.3da SURFACE WATER flELD PAR
Page 275 and 276:
TABLE 4.3-5 MONTHLY STREAMFLOW AVER
Page 277 and 278:
NA = not measured NF = no flow S =
Page 279 and 280:
TABLE 4.34b AVERAGE MONTHLY WATER B
Page 281 and 282:
Station RC- I RC-4 RC-9 Copper Cree
Page 283 and 284:
Hydrostratigraphic Unit SoilIFill C
Page 285 and 286:
TABLE 4.4-2 GROUNDWATER FIELD PARAM
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Stream Reach RC-4 to RC-7 RC-7 to R
Page 293 and 294:
TABLE 4.4-6 RESULTS OF OCTOBER 1998
Page 295 and 296:
Seep SP-8 was observed flowing in l
Page 297 and 298:
TABLE 4.448 SEEPAGE FIELD PARAMETER
Page 299 and 300:
TABLE 4.4- SEEPAGE FIELD PARAMETERS
Page 301 and 302:
TABLE 4.4-9 REACH 1 SITE-SPECIFIC W
Page 303 and 304:
Habitat Variable Stream Velocity an
Page 305 and 306:
a TABLE 4.6-2A BENTHIC MACROINVERTE
Page 307 and 308:
TABLE 4.6-2C DISTRIBUTION FIT FOR M
Page 309 and 310:
TABLE 4.6-3 TROUT POPULATION ESTIMA
Page 311 and 312:
Date September 9 September 10 Septe
Page 313 and 314:
TABLE 4.6-6 . HERPETOFAUNA LIKELY T
Page 315 and 316:
North-aspect Slope Sharp-shinned ha
Page 317 and 318:
! I TABLE 4.6-10 MAMMAL SPECIES OBS
Page 319 and 320:
CLIENT PRI VILECED AND CONFIDENTlA
Page 321 and 322:
TABLE 4.6-13 U.S. FOREST SERVICE SU
Page 323 and 324:
TABLE 4.6-15 SURVEY AND MANAGE SPEC
Page 325 and 326:
. . ; SOURCE: Wen et al., 1992 ,, .
Page 327 and 328:
SOURCE: Base mrlp information from
Page 329 and 330:
____------ ---_ SOURCES: Base map i
Page 331:
Page 334 and 335:
' Railroad Creek SOURCES: Northwest
Page 336 and 337:
- Approximate f' Plan View Outline
Page 338 and 339:
' DAMES LEGEND - Approximate extent
Page 340 and 341:
- LEGEND Approximate extent of unde
Page 342 and 343:
LEGEND ==s Approximate extent of un
Page 344 and 345:
- E 2f W . E Volcanic Arc Cascadia
Page 346:
,.' \ /- i \\ \ i i \ \..--A j \ /.
Page 349 and 350:
DMES & MOORE Figure 4.2-6a HOLDEN M
Page 351:
0.7 D.8 D. 9 E.0 E.l E.2 E.3 E.4 E.
Page 354 and 355:
LEGEND Bedrock F WEST SOURCE: North
Page 356 and 357:
G NORTH .- C u C al Alluvial rn Rew
Page 358 and 359:
File: g:/l7693005mA-4st.slp Glacial
Page 360 and 361:
3.24 3.23 X 3.22 w n 3.21 c .W 3.20
Page 362 and 363:
DAMES & MOORE A aAMES & MOORE GROUP
Page 364 and 365:
SOURCE: Base map inADrmatim from US
Page 366 and 367:
Figure 4.2-21 d HOLDEN MINE SUBSIDE
Page 368 and 369:
* r- Job DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 8 MO
Page 370:
SOURCE: Golder and Associates, 1990
Page 374 and 375:
SOURCE: Base nmp inlbnaficxl from U
Page 376 and 377:
SOURCE: Wters et al., 1992 0 2.5 5
Page 378 and 379:
D. 7 0.8 SOURCES: Base map informaf
Page 380 and 381:
SOURCE: Base map inlbrmatim lrom US
Page 382 and 383:
0.00 I I I I I I April May June Jul
Page 384:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 6. MOORE GROU
Page 388 and 389:
1.80 - 1 .. --.- -- 0.9 1.60 - ! Po
Page 390 and 391:
Note: No data available for June 19
Page 392:
: g ; . - . .... . -._. ........ .
Page 395 and 396:
LEGEND ..-.-.-.-.- Freewater surfac
Page 397:
SOURCE: Base map inlbrmation from U
Page 400:
' D. 7 . 0.8 D. 9 E.0 E. 1 E.2 E.3
Page 404 and 405:
C 0 % iil f 3192 - 3190 - 3188 3186
Page 406:
, -.I p./ ,/' i i .\ i i i -.-. i '
Page 409:
~ob NO. 1769300~019 Infiltration to
Page 412 and 413:
Overland . Flow Areawest of Site Ov
Page 414:
' SOURCE: Base map information from
Page 417 and 418:
D. 9 E.0 E.2 E.3 E.4 0.7 SOURCE: Ba
Page 419 and 420:
...... -.: - - ........... 3790 ,.-
Page 423 and 424:
DRAFT FINAL Remedial Investigation
Page 425 and 426:
(RAOs) section of the Feasibility S
Page 427 and 428:
Also included in WAC 173-201A are p
Page 429 and 430:
MTCA defines the methods and descri
Page 431 and 432:
The historical data for samples col
Page 433 and 434:
groundwater was encountered at appr
Page 435 and 436:
were below MTCA levels with the fol
Page 437 and 438:
sampling rounds, the field filter b
Page 439 and 440:
Department of Ecology samples colle
Page 441 and 442:
data sets where the total value was
Page 443 and 444:
5.3.1.3 Summary Based on the statis
Page 445 and 446:
adjacent to the Site were not neces
Page 447 and 448:
RC-4 is located downstream of the p
Page 449 and 450:
RC-2 is'located immediately downstr
Page 451 and 452:
In May 1997, copper (21.5 pg5) in t
Page 453 and 454:
Data collected from upstream statio
Page 455 and 456:
of water exiting from the portal. S
Page 457 and 458:
5.3.4.3 Historical Portal Drainage
Page 459 and 460:
parameters did not indicate seasona
Page 461 and 462:
The portal drainage was sampled at
Page 463 and 464:
and sodium were not evaluated as th
Page 465 and 466:
preliminary report 1997). Sample lo
Page 467 and 468:
time frame. The concentration of ea
Page 469 and 470:
5.4.2.4 Waste Rock Piies Seep sampl
Page 471 and 472:
Seep data were compared to MTCA gro
Page 473 and 474:
The data for seeps associated with
Page 475 and 476:
in wells TP1- 1A. TPl-2A, TPI-3A, T
Page 477 and 478:
5.4.2.8 Lucerne Well The well at th
Page 479 and 480:
Ninemile Creek) with a correspondin
Page 482 and 483:
During the mine reclamation activit
Page 484 and 485:
TABLE 5.0-1 KM OF SITE FEATURES 8 M
Page 486 and 487:
Page 488 and 489:
Page 490 and 491:
TABLE 5.2-1 SUMMARY OF RI SOlL ANAL
Page 492 and 493:
TABLE 5.2-1 SUMMARY OF Rl SOIL ANAL
Page 494 and 495:
TABLE 5.23 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SO
Page 496 and 497:
TABLE 5.24 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL TA
Page 498 and 499:
TABLE 5.2-5 SUMMARY OF RI TAILINGS
Page 500 and 501:
TABLE 5.2-6 POTENTIAL COMPOUNDS OF
Page 502 and 503:
TABLE 5.51 SURFACE WATER AREA BACKG
Page 504 and 505:
. . .. . . . .....-a .---.-I--u,. C
Page 506 and 507:
TABLE 5.3-2 Aluminum Data Points, B
Page 508 and 509:
TABLE 5.34 Beryllium Data Points. B
Page 510 and 511:
TABLE 5.3-6 Chromium Data Points. B
Page 512 and 513:
TABLE 5.34 lron Data Points. Backgr
Page 514 and 515:
TABLE 5.3-10 Magnesium Data Points,
Page 516 and 517:
TABLE 5.3-12 Selenium Data Points,
Page 518 and 519:
TABLE 5.3-14 Zinc Data Points, Back
Page 520 and 521:
TABLE 5.3-16 Statistical Summary -F
Page 522 and 523:
TABLE 5.3-18 SUMMARY OF RI SURFACE
Page 524 and 525:
h:\holden\drafi final nrpt\SS\TaMes
Page 526 and 527:
TmLE 5.240 STATION RG2 AND P ROXW S
Page 529 and 530:
TABLE 5.3-20 h:\holden\draft final
Page 531:
TPBLE 5.3-21 STATION RCJ AHD PROXBS
Page 534 and 535:
TABLE 5.3-21 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QU
Page 536 and 537:
TABLE 5.3-24 SUMMARY OF SURFACE WAT
Page 538 and 539:
h V~olden\draR final nrpt\S-5\Table
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
Page 544 and 545:
TABLE 5.3-28 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QU
Page 546 and 547:
TABLE 5.529 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QUA
Page 548 and 549:
TABLE 5.3-30 SUMMARY OF RI PORTAL D
Page 550 and 551:
TABLE 5.W1 SUMMPRY OF HISTORICAL WA
Page 552:
TABLE 5.592 SUMMARY OF RI WATER QUA
Page 556 and 557:
TABLE 5.3-35 TABLE 5.355 SUMMARY OF
Page 558 and 559:
TABLE 5.358 SUMMARY OF WATER QUALIT
Page 560 and 561:
n.\holden\draR Rnal r1rpt\S-5\tabIe
Page 562 and 563:
TABLE 5.4-1 SUMMARY OF RI GROUNDWAT
Page 564 and 565:
TABLE 5.4-1 SUMMARY OF Rl GROUNDWAT
Page 566 and 567:
TABLE 5.4-2 SUMMARY OF RI SEEPAGE W
Page 568 and 569:
TABLE 5.4-2 SUMMARY OF R1 SEEPAGE W
Page 570 and 571:
TABLE 5.4-2 SUMHAW OF RI SEEPAGE WA
Page 572 and 573:
TABLE 5.43 HlSTORlCAL SUMMARY OF GR
Page 574 and 575:
TABLE 5.4-4 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF S
Page 576 and 577:
TABLE 5.44 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SE
Page 578 and 579:
TABLE 5.44 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF MI
Page 580 and 581:
TABLE 5.5-1 SUMWRY Of HISlORlcbl DA
Page 582 and 583:
TABLE 5.5-2 SUMMARY OF FALL 1998 SE
Page 584 and 585:
TABLE 5.61 SUWAARY OF 1997 FERRICRE
Page 586 and 587:
D.7 D.8 SOURCE: Base map informatio
Page 588:
Scale in Feet Irene Lode Figure 5.2
Page 593 and 594:
i i Wilderness i I i I i I P.J i i
Page 595 and 596:
Date -+-- Discharge (cfs) 4'- ~lumi
Page 597 and 598:
DAMES & MOORE A oAW 6 MooRE GROUP C
Page 599 and 600:
-+- pischarge (cfs) I t hardness 1
Page 601 and 602:
-I Job NO. 17693-005-01 9 .----. Ma
Page 603 and 604:
160 -.- May-Zinc --- September-Zinc
Page 606:
SOURCE: Base map infomtim horn USFS
Page 609:
D.8 D. 9 E.0 ..... E.2 E.3 E.4 a D.
Page 613 and 614:
SOURCE. Base map information frwn U
Page 620:
SOURCE: Base map inlomtim frwn USFS
Page 631:
SOURCE: Base map inlbrmatim from US
Page 636 and 637:
Approximate Scale in Feet DAMES & M
Page 638 and 639:
LEGEND -- -A O Ferr~crete, floccule
Page 640 and 641:
Subsection 6.4 presents general Sit
Page 642 and 643:
.LXOdW RI WNId W@Md 11:V:6661 'LZ A
Page 644 and 645:
snowmelt on the adjacent valley slo
Page 646 and 647:
1XCH3d Ill I V N U ~ I l:O!6661 b ~
Page 648 and 649:
63.1.1 Sulfide Mineral Oxidation Th
Page 650 and 651:
a IXOdIM Ill WW UVXCI%M 11:P!6661 '
Page 652 and 653:
Co-precipitation. Sorption. 633.1 D
Page 654 and 655:
Eh Control on Preeipitation/Dissoln
Page 657 and 658:
6.4.1 Evidence of Iron Sulfide Mine
Page 659 and 660:
to the underground mine workings, r
Page 661 and 662:
The pH to copper relationship (Figu
Page 663 and 664:
' 6.5.1 Air and Water Movement Asso
Page 665 and 666:
not originating h m the underground
Page 667 and 668:
sulfate discharged from the portal
Page 669 and 670:
decreases also, aiding in the disso
Page 671 and 672:
West Waste Rock Pie, Mill Building,
Page 673 and 674:
Mixing of Seeps with Railroad Creek
Page 675 and 676:
through diffusion. This is indicate
Page 677 and 678:
MINTEQA2 indicates that the seep wa
Page 679 and 680:
In order to provide comparative flo
Page 681 and 682:
main source of zinc load (82 percen
Page 683 and 684:
source areas was estimated from flo
Page 685 and 686:
Monitoring of seeps from drill hole
Page 687 and 688:
(i.e., portal drainage) for cadmium
Page 689 and 690:
Upstream of the tailings piles, sig
Page 691 and 692:
Source controls reflect the differe
Page 693 and 694:
a. H:\Holden\Draft TABLE 6.0-1 KEY
Page 695 and 696:
Page 697 and 698:
Page 699:
i V'6 SZP C0'0 pea? t-38~0 sfiw i18
Page 702 and 703:
Table 6.64 Loadlng Calculations - A
Page 704 and 705:
Job NO. 17693-005-01 9 Draft Final
Page 707 and 708:
1500 Ventilator Portal (Elev. 3454)
Page 709 and 710:
Job NO. 17693-005-019 - - - - LEGEN
Page 711 and 712:
SOURCE: SRK Oxidant I 2+ H+ SO 2+ +
Page 713:
SOURCE: SRK DWVES & MOORE A oAW 6 M
Page 716:
SOURCE: SRK Trace elements are co-p
Page 719 and 720:
J O NO. ~ 17693-005-019 10000 -f 0
Page 721 and 722:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 6 MOORE GROUP
Page 723 and 724:
10 -1: - I e@ i ! 1 I 1 -1 i --- I
Page 725 and 726:
I * pi-- Tailings Pile 1 Tailings P
Page 728 and 729:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES a MOORE GROUP
Page 730 and 731:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMES 6 MOORE GROUP
Page 732 and 733:
SOURCES: SRK H Flushing Reduced Som
Page 734 and 735:
SOURCES: SRK 'nfi""On Limited Air M
Page 736 and 737:
Figure 6.5-5 DAMES & MOORE 1997 POR
Page 739 and 740:
Page 741 and 742:
SOURCE: SRK Oxidation limit Mn++ Fe
Page 743:
Direct Precipitation IXMES & MOORE
Page 746 and 747:
Infiltration of Snowmelt and Interm
Page 748 and 749:
Notes: Water Runon and Direct Preci
Page 750 and 751:
Surface Water Runon and Direct Prec
Page 752 and 753:
SOURCE: SRK L DAMES ,& MOORE A DAME
Page 754 and 755:
SOURCE: SRK 10 -i DAMES & MOORE + H
Page 756 and 757:
(* 6.0 TRANSPORT AND FATE OF COMPOU
Page 758 and 759:
1 I .J Quartz-rich layeis of 40 per
Page 760 and 761:
Crystalline crusts were observed in
Page 762 and 763:
I ( 4. -.- h .*, Evidence of signif
Page 764 and 765:
Predicted saturation indices (SI) f
Page 766 and 767:
Another iron sulfide mineral at the
Page 768 and 769:
. .. . .I.- ..9 6 If water flow is
Page 770 and 771:
pH Control on Precipitation~Dissolu
Page 772 and 773:
summer. Efflorescence occurs when w
Page 774 and 775:
6.4.1 Evidence of Iron Sulfide Mine
Page 776 and 777:
to the underground mine workings, r
Page 778 and 779:
The pH to copper relationship (Figu
Page 780 and 781:
6.5.1 Air and Water Movement Associ
Page 782 and 783:
.._/ not originating from the under
Page 784 and 785:
,' sulfate discharged from the port
Page 786 and 787:
decreases also, aiding in the disso
Page 788 and 789:
.: ._..I $ . .,'. Seasonal s , - We
Page 790 and 791:
. ., Miring of Seeps with Railroad
Page 792 and 793:
through diffusion. This is indicate
Page 794 and 795:
MlNTEQA2 indicates that the seep wa
Page 796 and 797:
In order to. provide comparative fl
Page 798 and 799:
main source of zinc load (82 percen
Page 800 and 801:
,:..' -- . source areas was estimat
Page 802 and 803:
Monitoring of seeps from drill hole
Page 804 and 805:
,' .... . control and buffering by
Page 806 and 807:
, ; . ..' , . .. .. -. . ..&. .< .
Page 808 and 809:
-- (i,e., portal drainage) for cadm
Page 810 and 811:
Page 812 and 813:
Page 814 and 815:
Page 816 and 817:
T.bk abi Losding WNlatlons - R d W
Page 818 and 819:
TABLE 6.6-3 LOADING CALCULATIONS -
Page 820 and 821:
J O NO. ~ 17693-005-019 Draft Final
Page 824 and 825:
Approximate -1 % Grade for 15OPLeve
Page 826 and 827:
LEGEND SP14 Seep sample location P-
Page 828 and 829:
Oxidant I ZnS H20 (transport mechan
Page 830:
Figure 6.3-4a I SOURCE: SRK Figure
Page 835 and 836:
0 RC 1 0 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC5 Tail
Page 837 and 838:
0 RC 1 0 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC5 Tail
Page 839 and 840:
0 RC 1 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC5 Tailin
Page 841 and 842:
1000 -: 0 RC 1 RC4 A RC7 X RC2 0 RC
Page 843:
P A DAMES MOORE GROUP COMPANY ' + 0
Page 846 and 847:
I ARC7 XRC 2 I I ORC5. Tailings Pil
Page 848 and 849:
ORC 1 ORC 4 ARC 7 XRC2 ORC 5 Tailin
Page 850:
SOURCES: SRK Northwest Geophpysrcal
Page 853 and 854:
Date Figure 6.5-5 DAMES & MOORE 199
Page 855 and 856:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 857 and 858:
0 Acidity Addition Water Runon end
Page 859:
SOURCE: SRK Oxidation limit Mn++ Fe
Page 862 and 863:
In~Vtratim to Grwndwater . Base of
Page 864:
Note: Some flow lost into plane of
Page 868:
Approximate Scale in Feet SOURCE: O
Page 871 and 872:
SOURCE: SRK 1 L 'i +- Holden P-5 (B
Page 873 and 874:
7.0 BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Both a
Page 875 and 876:
7.1.1.2 Site-Specific Human Health
Page 877 and 878:
Surface Water Historic and 1997-199
Page 879 and 880:
environment. IHSs were selected for
Page 881 and 882:
Railroad Creek can be utilized by v
Page 883 and 884:
Exposure Routes expected to be redu
Page 885 and 886:
and the USFS guard station. Holden
Page 887 and 888:
No Method A levels are available fo
Page 889 and 890:
7.133 Screening Level Evaluation of
Page 891 and 892:
they are not expected to present an
Page 893 and 894:
Sediment Railroad Creek and Site Hi
Page 895 and 896:
the ventilator portal drainage is n
Page 897 and 898:
are based on different mechanistic
Page 899 and 900:
Selection of.Target Risk and Hazard
Page 901 and 902:
Noncarcinogens: Inhalation of Air w
Page 903 and 904:
where: PEF = Particulate emission f
Page 905 and 906:
arsenic in the USFS guard station s
Page 907 and 908:
Use of toxicity criteria (CPFs and
Page 909 and 910:
7.1.5.4 Surface Water and Fish Surf
Page 911 and 912:
identify dismbutions of compounds o
Page 913 and 914:
most abundant species in Railroad C
Page 915 and 916:
mechanisms, PCOCs originating from
Page 917 and 918:
copper, lead, and zinc is shown in
Page 919 and 920:
Measurement Endpoints Measurement e
Page 921 and 922:
to the extrapolation to low hardnes
Page 923 and 924:
concentration that contains the bio
Page 925 and 926:
Lupinus bicolor, and Trijolium praf
Page 927 and 928:
Although certain benthic invertebra
Page 929 and 930: estimated from the available liver
Page 931 and 932: of between a low of 34 ha. for does
Page 933 and 934: Little Brown Bat The little brown b
Page 935 and 936: Since none of the UCL concentration
Page 937 and 938: , Hazard quotients for osprey consu
Page 939 and 940: appropriate metric for protection o
Page 941 and 942: Table 7.2.4-1 1A shows that red-tai
Page 943 and 944: 7.2.5 SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY Limita
Page 945 and 946: laboratory studies to field exposur
Page 947 and 948: I I tailings piles difficult. Likew
Page 949 and 950: other mine sites where plants &re s
Page 951 and 952: TABLE 7.0-1 . KEY OF SITE FEATURES
Page 953 and 954: TABLE 7.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
Page 955 and 956: TABLE 7.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
Page 957 and 958: ' TABLE 7.18 STATISTICAL ANALYSJS A
Page 959 and 960: TABLE 7.14 STAnSTlCAL EVALUATION AN
Page 961 and 962: TABLE 7.14 STATISTICAL EVALUATION A
Page 963 and 964: TABLE 7.14 STATISTICAL EVALUATION A
Page 965 and 966: TABLE 7.14 COMPARISON OF SEDIMENTAR
Page 967 and 968: H:Wolden\Drafl final ri rpt\S-7\Hhr
Page 969 and 970: TABLE 7.14 SURFACE WATER AREA BACKG
Page 971 and 972: H.Wolden\drafl final rirpt\S-7WhraU
Page 973 and 974: TABLE 7.1-E SURFACE WATER AREA BACK
Page 975: TABLE T.1-F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AN
Page 978 and 979: TABLE 7.1 -F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A
Page 982 and 983: H-Wolden\draR final rirptS-7\Hhra\T
Page 984 and 985: H.\Holden\drafl final rirpt\S-7Whra
Page 986 and 987: TABLE 7.14 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND
Page 988 and 989: TABLE 7.1H STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND
Page 990 and 991: TABLE 7.144 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AN
Page 994 and 995: TABLE 7.14 STATlSnCN ANNYSS AND COM
Page 998 and 999: TABLE 7.1 -K MEAN METAL CONCENTRATI
Page 1000: TABLE 7.1-2 METHOD A LEVELS USED IN
Page 1003 and 1004: TABLE 7.1-5 CARCINOGEN CLASSIFICATI
Page 1005 and 1006: TABLE 7.1-7 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING
Page 1007 and 1008: TABLE 7.1-9 HUMAN HEALTH XREENING O
Page 1009: TABLE 7.1-11 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING
Page 1012 and 1013: TABLE 7.1-14 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENlNG
Page 1014 and 1015: TABLE 7.1-16 HUWlAN HEALTH SCREENIN
Page 1016 and 1017: . . . . -- m3zri .. ........ . . .
Page 1018 and 1019: TABLE 7.1-20 HUMAN HEALM SCREENING
Page 1028 and 1029: *-. - -. -. -- .- ..~ -- .- .- . ..
Page 1031 and 1032:
TABLE 7.1-33 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING
Page 1033 and 1034:
TABLE 7.135 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING
Page 1035 and 1036:
. TABLE 7.1 -37 EXPOSURE CONCENTRAT
Page 1037 and 1038:
TABLE 7.1-JS EXPOSURE FACTORS USED
Page 1039 and 1040:
TABLE 7.1-41 COMPARISON OF SITESPEC
Page 1041 and 1042:
TABLE 7.1-43 EVALUATION OF CUMULATI
Page 1043 and 1044:
Constituent Beryllium Cadmium Acute
Page 1045 and 1046:
Constituent Lead Manganese Molybden
Page 1047 and 1048:
Constituent Diesel Fuel, Light Weig
Page 1049 and 1050:
TABLE 7.2.2-1 A STATISTICAL ANALYSI
Page 1051 and 1052:
TABLE 7.2.2-181 STATISTICAL ANALYSI
Page 1053 and 1054:
U . PersMler was ambfzed fa. W rd d
Page 1055 and 1056:
TABLE 7.2.2-1C COMPARISON OF SEDIME
Page 1057 and 1058:
TABLE 7.2.2-lC COMPARISON OF SEDIME
Page 1059 and 1060:
TABLE 7.2.2-1E STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1061 and 1062:
TABLE 7.2.2-1F STAllSTlCAL ANALYSIS
Page 1063 and 1064:
TABLE 7.2.2-1F STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1065 and 1066:
TABLE 7.2.2-IF STAnSTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1067 and 1068:
TABLE 7.2.2-IF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1069 and 1070:
TABLE 7.22-lG STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1071 and 1072:
TABLE 7.2.2-1 H STATISTICAL ANALYSI
Page 1073 and 1074:
TABLE 7.2.2-1H STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Page 1075 and 1076:
Page 1077 and 1078:
Page 1079 and 1080:
Cascades frog Ram cascadoe TABLE 7.
Page 1081 and 1082:
TABLE 7.2.2-3 TOXICITY BENCHMARKS F
Page 1083 and 1084:
italics - highest value 1 - adjuste
Page 1085 and 1086:
TABLE 7.2.3-2A SCREENING OF COCS FO
Page 1087 and 1088:
italics- highes~ value TABLE 7.2.3-
Page 1089 and 1090:
I TABLE 7.23-4A TOXICITY REFERENCE
Page 1091 and 1092:
metal Cadmium Copper Lead Zinc TABL
Page 1093 and 1094:
TABLE 7.2.3-7 DOSES TO AMERICAN DIP
Page 1095 and 1096:
TABLE 7.2.3-9 DOSES TO MINK CONSUMI
Page 1097 and 1098:
Flesh Soil Plants G:\wpdata\M)S\rep
Page 1099 and 1100:
TABLE 7.2.3-13 DOSES TO DEER MICE H
Page 1101 and 1102:
a H:\Holden\Drafl TABLE 7.2.3-15 DO
Page 1103 and 1104:
TABLE 7.2.3-17 DOSES TO AMERICAN RO
Page 1105 and 1106:
' TABLE 7.2.4-la HAZARD QUOTIENTS F
Page 1107 and 1108:
TABLE 7.2.4-2C HAZARD QUOTIENTS FOR
Page 1109 and 1110:
TABLE 7.2.4-3 HAZARD QUOTIENTS FOR
Page 1111 and 1112:
Page 1113 and 1114:
TABLE 7.2.4-7a HAZARD QUOTIENTS FOR
Page 1115 and 1116:
Page 1117 and 1118:
TABLE 7.2.4-11a HAZARD QUOTIENTS FO
Page 1119 and 1120:
TABLE 7.2.4-13a HAZARD QUOTIENTS FO
Page 1121 and 1122:
~ob NO. 17693-005-019 Holden Mine R
Page 1123 and 1124:
DNWS & MOORE A DAMES h MOORE GROUP
Page 1125 and 1126:
SOURCE RELEASE EXPOSURE MECHANISM M
Page 1127 and 1128:
Figure 7.2-1 Conceptual Site Model
Page 1129 and 1130:
which includes protected natural re
Page 1131 and 1132:
The dense glacial till overlying th
Page 1133 and 1134:
Tailings pile 1 was utilized as a m
Page 1135 and 1136:
8.2.3 Surface Water 8.2.3.1 Railroa
Page 1137 and 1138:
covered with flocculent. The floccu
Page 1139 and 1140:
It is likely that much of the water
Page 1141 and 1142:
8.2.3.7 Aquatic Reference Reaches T
Page 1143 and 1144:
Mill. Mine Sup~ort and Waste Rock P
Page 1145 and 1146:
maintenance building, which also ho
Page 1147 and 1148:
The calculated total numbers of fis
Page 1149 and 1150:
Reference Reaches - Upstream Railro
Page 1151 and 1152:
apparent lack of aquatic toxicity a
Page 1153 and 1154:
8.3 SITE CONTAMINANT CHARACTERIZATI
Page 1155 and 1156:
25 pprn hardness as this is the min
Page 1157 and 1158:
Additionally, the data at P-1 were
Page 1159 and 1160:
8.3.5.2 Lucerne Bar & Stehekin Rive
Page 1161 and 1162:
Comparison of sulfate and aluminum
Page 1163 and 1164:
The abandoned Railroad Creek stream
Page 1165 and 1166:
groundwater levels.are highest in t
Page 1167 and 1168:
SOURCE: USGS Topographic Map. State
Page 1169 and 1170:
DAMES & MOORE A DAMEs a MWRE GROUP
Page 1171 and 1172:
Job NO. 17693-005-019 Figure 8.1 -5
Page 1173 and 1174:
5 SOURCE:! Wters eta/., 1992 i USGS
Page 1175 and 1176:
9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 1177 and 1178:
9.2.4 Component Inflow Sources and
Page 1179 and 1180:
areas and loading to Railroad Creek
Page 1181 and 1182:
At approximately 3 miles downstream
Page 1183 and 1184:
case scenario; however, suitable ea
Page 1185 and 1186:
9.3.4 Maintenance Yard 9.3.5 Lagoon
Page 1187:
: SOURCE: Wters eta/., 1992 _...___
Page 1190 and 1191:
i ,./' i - Creek /.- i i i '. . i '
Page 1192 and 1193:
I 11.0 REFERENCES A&L'Mid West Labo
Page 1194 and 1195:
Brown, H.A., R.B. Bury, D.M. Darda,
Page 1196 and 1197:
e ' Dames & Moore, 1997f. Phase I R
Page 1198 and 1199:
Hall, E.R. and K.R. Kelson. 1959. T
Page 1200 and 1201:
Kilburn, J.E. & S.J. Sutley. 1997.
Page 1202 and 1203:
Mitchell, J.L. 1961. Mink Movements
Page 1204 and 1205:
Peven, C.M.1989. Lake Chelan Spawni
Page 1206 and 1207:
U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau
Page 1208 and 1209:
P a Eastside U.S. Geological Survey
Page 1210 and 1211:
Washington State Department of Ecol
Page 1213 and 1214:
, DAMES DRAFT FINAL Remedial Invest
Page 1215 and 1216:
I June 15,1998 Field QC Samples, Ma
Page 1217 and 1218:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1219 and 1220:
Page 1221 and 1222:
I Date: /a SW-846. MEMORANDUM To: F
Page 1223 and 1224:
June 15, 1998 Surface Water, May 19
Page 1225 and 1226:
Page 1227 and 1228:
Page 1229 and 1230:
INORQANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTA
Page 1231 and 1232:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTA
Page 1233 and 1234:
Page 1235 and 1236:
Page 1237 and 1238:
INORGANICS'ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1239 and 1240:
Page 1241 and 1242:
Page 1243 and 1244:
Page 1245 and 1246:
Page 1247 and 1248:
Page 1249 and 1250:
Page 1251 and 1252:
Page 1253 and 1254:
Page 1255 and 1256:
Page 1257 and 1258:
cli INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Page 1259 and 1260:
I@ '.J INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHE
Page 1261 and 1262:
Page 1263 and 1264:
Page 1265 and 1266:
I INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1267 and 1268:
Page 1269 and 1270:
Page 1271 and 1272:
Page 1273 and 1274:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET @. S
Page 1275 and 1276:
Sample No: RC-7 Lab Sample ID: W219
Page 1277 and 1278:
Pinal Report Laboratory Analyeia of
Page 1279 and 1280:
Final Report Laboratory Analysis of
Page 1281 and 1282:
@ QA Report - Replicate Analysis QC
Page 1283 and 1284:
I QA Report - Laboratory Control Sa
Page 1285 and 1286:
TOTAL GASOLINE RANGE HYDROCARBONS W
Page 1287 and 1288:
TOTAL DIESEL RANGE HYDROCARBONS WA
Page 1289 and 1290:
I CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD i 500 Mar
Page 1291 and 1292:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD WHITE COPY-
Page 1293 and 1294:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeie of
Page 1295 and 1296:
QA Report - Method Blank Analysis Q
Page 1297 and 1298:
QA Report - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spi
Page 1299 and 1300:
QA Report - Standard Reference Mate
Page 1301 and 1302:
@ TOTAL GASOLINE RANGE HYDROCARBONS
Page 1303 and 1304:
TOTAL DIBSEL RANGB HYDROCARBONS WA
Page 1305 and 1306:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD WHITE COPY-
Page 1307 and 1308:
@ MEMORANDUM .-. Date: To: From: Su
Page 1309 and 1310:
June 8, 1998 Seep and Portal, May 1
Page 1311 and 1312:
* Page June 8.1998 Seep &d Portal,
Page 1313 and 1314:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DISS
Page 1315 and 1316:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DISS
Page 1317 and 1318:
Page 1319 and 1320:
Page 1321 and 1322:
Page 1323 and 1324:
Page 1325 and 1326:
Page 1327 and 1328:
Page 1329 and 1330:
Page 1331 and 1332:
Page 1333 and 1334:
Page 1335 and 1336:
Page 1337 and 1338:
Page 1339 and 1340:
Page 1341 and 1342:
Page 1343 and 1344:
Final Report ~aborato-~ Anelyeis of
Page 1345 and 1346:
Final Re~ort - Laboratory L?slysie
Page 1347 and 1348:
Page 1349 and 1350:
QA Report - Matrix.Spike/Matrix Spi
Page 1351 and 1352:
QA Report - Standard Reference Mate
Page 1353 and 1354:
QA Report - Replicate Analyeis QC R
Page 1355 and 1356:
QA Report - Laboratory Control Samp
Page 1357 and 1358:
Page 1359 and 1360:
.. . . . L - , ..- .U ,- Y a 5 ~bm
Page 1361 and 1362:
June 8,1998 Equipment Blank, May 19
Page 1363 and 1364:
Page 1365 and 1366:
METALS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL ME
Page 1367 and 1368:
i TMY !-, 7'. O CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RE
Page 1369 and 1370:
June 15,1998 Low Level Lead, May 19
Page 1371 and 1372:
Sample Results for Dames and Moore
Page 1373 and 1374:
S& -sshc.-rx rotor. n; a 57,m 11‘
Page 1375 and 1376:
Frontier Geosciences Inc. 414 Ponti
Page 1377 and 1378:
June 25, 1998 Ventilator Portal, Ju
Page 1379 and 1380:
Page 1381 and 1382:
Page 1383 and 1384:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET -TOT
Page 1385 and 1386:
- Date: December 11, 1998 , . . , ,
Page 1387 and 1388:
December 1 1, 1998 Sediment Data, F
Page 1389 and 1390:
, . ' December 1 1, 1998 Sediment D
Page 1391 and 1392:
INORQANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1393 and 1394:
Page 1395 and 1396:
Page 1397 and 1398:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHBBT Samp
Page 1399 and 1400:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET samp
Page 1401 and 1402:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - TO
Page 1403 and 1404:
INOROANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1405 and 1406:
INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ' Sa
Page 1407 and 1408:
Page 1409 and 1410:
Page 1411 and 1412:
Page 1413 and 1414:
Page 1415 and 1416:
Page 1417 and 1418:
Page 1419 and 1420:
Pinal Report Laboratory Analyeie of
Page 1421 and 1422:
@ Final Report Laboratory Analysie
Page 1423 and 1424:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeie of
Page 1425 and 1426:
Final Report ~aborato-~ Analyeie of
Page 1427 and 1428:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeis of
Page 1429 and 1430:
Final Report Laboratory Analysie of
Page 1431 and 1432:
Final Report Laboratory Analyeis of
Page 1433 and 1434:
Page 1435 and 1436:
QA Report - Replicate Analysis QC R
Page 1437 and 1438:
QA Report - ~ab'oratory Control Sam
Page 1439 and 1440:
a Rosa Environmental & Geotechnical
Page 1441 and 1442:
!q Rosa Environmental Ge6.- -. lcal
Page 1443 and 1444:
i - - ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHN
Page 1445 and 1446:
- ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL
Page 1447 and 1448:
ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL L
Page 1449 and 1450:
Page 1451 and 1452:
I I PSEP APPARENT GRAIN SlZE DISTRI
Page 1453 and 1454:
I ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL
Page 1455 and 1456:
L --- ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL 8 GEOTECHN
Page 1457 and 1458:
Page 1459 and 1460:
. ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOTECHNICAL
Page 1461 and 1462:
ROSA ENVIRONMENTAL 1~ GEOTECHNICAL
Page 1463 and 1464:
Field Sample I Chain of Custody Rec
Page 1465 and 1466:
Field Sample I Chain of Custody Rec
Page 1467 and 1468:
MEMORANDUM Date: July 2,1999 To: Ri
Page 1469 and 1470:
INORQANICS ANALYSIS DATA'SHBET Samp
Page 1471 and 1472:
INORQANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Samp
Page 1473 and 1474:
Decc~nbcr 8, 1998 Background Soil D
Page 1475 and 1476:
December 8, 1998 Background Soil Da
Page 1477 and 1478:
Page 1479 and 1480:
Page 1481 and 1482:
Page 1483 and 1484:
Page 1485 and 1486:
Page 1487 and 1488:
Page 1489 and 1490:
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL
Page 1491 and 1492:
Page 1493 and 1494:
Page 1495 and 1496:
Page 1497 and 1498:
Page 1499 and 1500:
Page 1501 and 1502:
Page 1503:
Page 1506 and 1507:
MEMORANDUM @ Date: December 8. 1998
Page 1508 and 1509:
Dcccmbcr 8, 1998 Lagoon Soil Samplc
Page 1510 and 1511:
Page 1512 and 1513:
Page 1514 and 1515:
- INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1516 and 1517:
Page 1518 and 1519:
. INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Sa
Page 1520 and 1521:
Page 1522 and 1523:
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL
Page 1524 and 1525:
TOTAL DIESEL RANGE HYDROCARBONS WA
Page 1526 and 1527:
TOTAL DIESEL RANGE HYDROCARBONS Lab
Page 1528 and 1529:
TOTAL DIESEL RANGE HYDROCARBONS Ran
Page 1530 and 1531:
-, - - -* 2; 3 \) \e 4 av\ ~ u h ~
Page 1532 and 1533:
DBM CONTACT: FIELD NOTES:' DATE OF
Page 1534 and 1535:
ROCK STRUCTURAL DATA FIELD SHEET JO
Page 1537:
schmit 011 fdling 71.58.50. phom N6
Page 1540 and 1541:
APPENDIX N RESULTS OF STATISTICAL A
Page 1542 and 1543:
Railraod Creek September 1998 Basef
Page 1544 and 1545:
January 20,1998 Robert Quinlan Dame
Page 1546 and 1547:
MACROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: D
Page 1548 and 1549:
I I MACROINVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIEN
Page 1550 and 1551:
I RACROlNVERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT:
Page 1552 and 1553:
1 YSECTA WACROINMRTEBRATE DENSITY C
Page 1554 and 1555:
I 'MA NSECTA Capni i&e Claassmie se
Page 1556 and 1557:
TAXA INSECTA Desputis sugusts Leuct
Page 1558 and 1559:
MCROINYERTEBRATE DENSITY CLIENT: DU
Page 1560 and 1561:
MACROINVERTEBRATE DEUSITY CLIENT: O
Page 1562 and 1563:
.. DAMES AND MOORE HOLDEN MINE REFE
Page 1564 and 1565:
DAMES AND MOORE HOLDEN MINE REFEREN
Page 1566 and 1567:
APPENDIX P WASHINGTON NATURAL HERIT
show all

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?