13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Little Brown Bat<br />

The little brown bat is a nocturnal species that feeds exclusively on insects captured in flight. emerging from<br />

surface waters, or stationary on vegetation (Sample et al., 1997). Aquatic insects (e.g., Chironomodidae.<br />

Diptera, Isoptera, and Trichoptera) are the primary types of insects capnrred in western Oregon (Whitaker et<br />

al., 1977) and collected in Railroad Creek. Reported body weights range from about 3 to 12 g, but average<br />

about 8 g (Sample et al., 1997). Bats are active chiefly from March to August, and hibernate during the<br />

winter and early Spring.<br />

Using the equations provided by Sample et al. (1997), this is a feeding rate of 0.162 kg/kg body weight per<br />

day, and a drinking rate of 0.160 L/kg body weight per day. Although the forage range of this species is not<br />

known, a related species, the gray bat may travel as far as 12 km from roost to foraging areas (LaVal et al..<br />

1977).<br />

It was assumed that little brown bats at the Holden Mine site feed on emerging aquatic insects. Therefore.<br />

the predicted insect body burdens found in Table 7.2.3-6, were used to estimate the dose received by bats in<br />

the area (Table 7.2.3- 18).<br />

7.2.4 Risk Characterization<br />

The risk characterization was first evaluated for locations where the highest concentrations of metals were<br />

found using worst case exposure assumptions. If risk was found using these worst case exposure<br />

assumptions, these assumptions were modified to better reflect more probable exposures. This more refined<br />

level of analysis was only conducted where risk was found using the most conservative exposure<br />

assumptions.<br />

The hazard quotient (HQ) method of risk characterization was used to assess the potential for existing metal<br />

concentrations at the Holden Mine site to pose risks to ecological receptor species. The worst case HQ for<br />

each PCOC was determined by dividing the upper 95 percent confidence limit on the mean of the site<br />

concentration or estimated dose data by the appropriate toxicity reference value (TRV) for each ROC in a<br />

given potentially complete exposure pathway:<br />

HQ = concentration or dose/TRV 7-23<br />

The total risk for each ROC was determined by summing the hazard quotients for each exposure pathway<br />

(XHQ). At this time the USEPA and Ecology have not provided specific guidance to interpret hazard<br />

quotients. However, it is generally accepted that when CHQ > 1 .O, there may be a small potential risk of<br />

adverse effects to ecological receptors. The British Columbia Ministry of the Environment, Land, and<br />

Planning (BCMELP, 1998) has defined HQs > 1 but 400, as an intermediate risk, and HQs > 100 as high<br />

risk. The specific HQ for each PCOC and ROC exposed to the UCL concentrations measured are shown in<br />

Tables 7.2.4-1 to 7.2.4-14. Individual HQs were not added to produce hazard indices (HIS) because there is<br />

insufficient evidence that metals act synergistically, and sufficient evidence to conclude that at least some<br />

metals act antagonistically (Bremmer, 1979; Zmudzki et al., 1984; Edelstein et al., 1984; Carlson et al..<br />

1985; van Barneveld et. al., 1985; Turecki et al., 1995).<br />

G:\wpd.uifal5LcpOmU1oI&11-2\n~74.doc 7-6 1<br />

17693dOS-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>;5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL IU REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!