13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

an "A" series well, it appears to be screened within tailings pile materials rather than the alluviallreworked<br />

till based on review of the boring log for this well (Appendix B).<br />

When two or more monitoring wells are completed at adjacent locations in different hydrostratigraphic<br />

units, those monitoring wells can be used to compare water levels in the units and assess the direction of<br />

potential groundwater flow between the units. Referring to Figure 4.4-1, clusters of adjacent wells occur<br />

at locations PZ-I, PZ-2, and PZ-3 on tailings pile 2, and PZ-4, PZ-5, and PZ-6 on tailings pile 3.<br />

Figures 4.4-12, 4.4-13, and 4.4-14 show groundwater levels measured in groundwater monitoring wells at<br />

locations PZ- 1 (south side tailings pile 2), PZ-3 (north side tailings pile 2), and PZ-4 (south side tailings pile<br />

3), respectively (Figure 4.4-1). Pressure headstwater levels in the "A" series wells exhibit a decrease in<br />

water level from May through September 1997. Water levels in the "B" and "C" series wells react in a<br />

similar manner to each other, remaining relatively constant, with slight rises seen in June or July. Pressure<br />

headslwater levels in the "A" series monitoring wells do not exhibit the same trend as water levels in the "B"<br />

and "C" series monitoring wells, as would be expected if all three series of monitoring wells were completed<br />

in a ,fully hydraulically connected unit.<br />

Throughout the Site, monitoring wells completed in native material indicate the same water 'level trend as<br />

described for the "A" series wells above. Groundwater level declines were large enough in two "A" series<br />

wells (PZ-1 A and PZ-4A) to result in their being dry in September 1997.<br />

"B" series monitoring wells, completed near the base of the tailings, showed the trend described above. One<br />

exception was monitoring well TP3-7B, which indicated decreasing water levels throughout the monitoring<br />

period. This monitoring well was identified during the initial well assessment as having a loose surface seal.<br />

It is possible that the downhole seal at this well has failed, and that surface water is allowed to drain into the<br />

well.<br />

Water level data for the RI were collected over a period of approximately five months (mid-May to late-<br />

September). This interval is believed to include the'period of highest groundwater levels (mid-May to mid-<br />

June) and of relatively low groundwater levels (September).<br />

4.4.3.3 Groundwater Flow<br />

Groundwater flow directions can be established from water-level elevation maps by drawing flow lines that<br />

run perpendicular to the groundwater elevation contour lines. Figures 4.4-6 through 4.4-9 are water level<br />

elevation maps based on measurements from wells completed in the alluvium, colluvium, and the<br />

alluvium/reworked till unit, respectively. Figures 4.4- 10 and 4.4- 1 1 are water level elevation maps based on<br />

measurements from monitoring wells screened in the tailings.<br />

Groundwater Flow in Native Materials<br />

The May water-level elevation map (Figure 4.4-6) shows a strong component of groundwater flow from the<br />

Site north toward Railroad Creek. Groundwater to the south of Railroad Creek is recharged by snowmelt<br />

from the southern side walls of the valley and flows primarily north toward Railroad Creek. Much of the<br />

groundwater flow is discharged to Railroad Creek, as described below; however, some groundwater likely<br />

flows longitudinally down valley beneath the creek. Groundwater gradients are relatively high, ranging as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!