13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

Dccember 8, 1998<br />

Background Soil Data, Fall 1998, Holdcn Mine<br />

Page 3<br />

recovery (52.6%) in the SRM associated with samples DMBG-11, DMBG-12, DMBG-13, DMBG-14,<br />

DMBG-15, DMBG-16, DMBG-17, DMBG-18, and DMBG-19 was below the typical LCS control limits of<br />

80 to 120%. However, the recovery was within the advisory range published by the supplier. Uranium<br />

was inadvertently omitted from SRM or LCS analysis.<br />

Data qualifiers were not assigned to aluminum or calcium results as the recoveries from the<br />

SRM were within published advisory ranges. Uranium results were not qualified as the associated matrix<br />

1 spike results were acceptable.<br />

I<br />

9. Laboratory Duplicate Sample<br />

A laboratory duplicate was performed on sample DMBG-10. The relative percent difference for<br />

chromium was 26.6 %, above the method criteria of 20%. Chromium results reported above the<br />

detection limit in associated samples are qualified as estimated and flagged "J" accordingly.<br />

Results reported as not detected do not require qualification. Associated samples include DMBG-1,<br />

DMBG-2, DMBG-3, DMBG-4, DMBG-5, DMBG-6, DMBG-7, DMBG-8, DMBG-9, DMBG-10, and<br />

DMBG-1 OX.<br />

1 A laboratory duplicate was performed'on sample DMBG-16. The relative percent difference for<br />

I manganese was 20.8%, slightly above the method criteria of 20%. Manganese results reported above<br />

the detection limit in associated samples are qualified as estimated and flagged 'J" accordingly. Results<br />

1 reported as not detected do not require qualification. Associated samples include DMBG-11, DMBG-12,<br />

DMBG-13, DMBG-14, DMBG-15, DMBG-16, DMBG-17, DMBG-18, and DMBG-19.<br />

i<br />

1 @ 10- Field Duplicate - Acceptable<br />

.F.<br />

1 .#*..<br />

1 ' ,<br />

11. Matrix Spike<br />

I<br />

A field duplicate .for DMBG-10 was submitted and labeled DMBG-1OX. Duplicate results were<br />

comparable to the original sample results.<br />

A matrix spike was performed on sample DMBG-10. The recovery for iron (47.4%) was outside<br />

of the control limits (75-125%). The concentration of iron (10,400 mglkg) in the sample exceeded the<br />

spiking concentration by greater than 4X. Data qualification was not required.<br />

A matrix spike was performed on sample DMBG-16. The recovery for aluminum (199%), iron<br />

(181%), and manganese (137%) were outside of the method control limits (75-125%). The concentration<br />

of aluminum (11,200 mglkg), iron (10,500 mglkg), and manganese (1,160 mglkg) in the sample<br />

exceeded the spiking concentration by greater than 4X. Data qualification was not required.<br />

I 12. Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption QC - Acceptable<br />

13. ICP Serial Dilution (ICP analysis only) - Acceptable<br />

1 14. Detection Limits - Acceptable<br />

15. Type of Review - Summary<br />

.<br />

16. Overall Assessment of Data<br />

The usefulness of the data is based on EPA guidance documents listed above. Upon<br />

consideration of the information presented above, the data are acceptable except where flagged with<br />

data qualifiers that modify the usefulness of the individual values.<br />

I g:/holden/l998/datavallvalY962.doc DAMES & MOORE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!