13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The field screening data combined with the laboratory analytical data from the Phase I sampling round<br />

was used to characterize areas of common chemistry on the Site. The field screening program for the<br />

Phase I1 RI was reduced to pH, specific conductance, and temperature for all surface water, groundwater,<br />

and seep samples due to the results of the Phase 1 RI. The value of continuing oxidationfreduction<br />

potential, dissolved oxygen, and ferrous iron during Phase I1 sampling efforts was considered limited as<br />

general chemical characteristics of the site were not expected to change and were documented during the<br />

Phase I activities.<br />

Turbidity and dissolved oxygen were measured during Phase I1 at stations RC-6. RC-2, and RC-3.<br />

Dissolved oxygen was measured by a quantitative chemical field test that allowed immediate titration of<br />

the sample and recording of the dissolved oxygen result. The results were compared to dissolved oxygen<br />

results measured by a field meter used in previous sampling rounds. The results obtained from the<br />

quantitative chemical field test were consistent with those obtained from the field meter.<br />

The field screening results for each sample were evaluated with the associated laboratory analytical data<br />

to more completely evaluate site chemistry and to assist in the development of remedial action objectives<br />

(RAOs).<br />

3.9 TASK 9 - ECOLOGICAL SURVEYS<br />

Referring to Figures 3.9-1 and 3.9-2, the ecological surveys conducted during the RI were primarily<br />

focused on aquatic communities; however, terrestrial communities were investigated to provide general<br />

characterizations of these communities and assess the potential for various terrestrial species that inhabit<br />

the Site. The surveys were designed to collect site-specific information for the ecological risk assessment<br />

and identification of potential injuries to natural resources. The results of the ecological surveys are<br />

presented in Section 4.6.<br />

3.9.1 Aquatic Biota<br />

3.9.1.1 Background<br />

Aquatic communities in the vicinity of the Site have been generally described in response to indications<br />

of impacts from mine activities. In particular, Pacific Northwest Laboratory (Battelle) investigated<br />

habitat, benthic macroinvertebrate communities, and fish populations in Railroad Creek from October<br />

1989 to April 1990. The investigations were conducted to describe "baseline" conditions prior to the<br />

Railroad Creek habitat enhancement activities. The reclamation activities were intended to increase the<br />

productivity of Railroad Creek and to reduce the potential for an occurrence of a catastrophic erosion<br />

event.<br />

The post reclamation aquatic biota monitoring plan recommended the sampling of aquatic biota during<br />

1990, 199 1, 1992, and 1996 (PNL, 1992). Post-reclamation aquatic monitoring was conducted in 199 1 by<br />

Pacific Northwest Laboratory (Battelle) and in 1992 the USFS. A formal report was prepared for the<br />

1991 data collection; however, the 1992 efforts, which included benthic macroinvertebrate and fish<br />

sampling (tissue and population data) were apparently not compiled in a formal or draft report. The 1992<br />

data were received in various forms directly and indirectly from the USFS. A review of these data<br />

indicated that descriptions of sampling methods, sample locations, areas sampled, etc., were insufficient<br />

for adequately describing the 1992 results or comparing the results to the 1991 and 1997 results. As such,<br />

G:\rvpdata\OO~hpoNWoldmZ\riUddd~ 3-20 DAMES & MOORE<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 19, <strong>1999</strong>;2:07 PM.DRAR FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!