13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Concentrations of PCOCs in other media, such as vegetation, aquatic insects.<br />

earthworms, and small mammals, were accounted for by modeling.<br />

In summary, the exposure pathways that are potentially complete at these sites and that will be<br />

quantitatively considered in this ERA are:<br />

Surface water to benthic organisms and fish<br />

Sediment to benthic organisms and fish<br />

Soil to terrestrial vegetation<br />

Soil to other terrestrial receptors<br />

Vegetation to terrestrial herbivores and omnivores<br />

Terrestrial and aquatic biota to upper trophic level consumers<br />

7.2.2.4 Sentinel, Indicator, and Surrogate Species - The Guild Approach<br />

Receptor guilds (organisms with similar life histories or niches in the environment) have been used rather<br />

than individual species for.this assessment because the general characteristics of each guild will provide risk<br />

estimates that are representative of the entire guild. As such, these can be extrapolated more broadly than<br />

single species estimates. The underlying concept is that each receptor of particular concern falls into a<br />

group of potential receptors that function in similar ecological niches ("guilds"). For example, many species<br />

of hawk feed on small mammals and require trees or cliffs for roosts. As such, each of these hawks display<br />

similar life-histories and would be anticipated to have similar exposures to PCOCs at the sites. A single<br />

surrogate, for example the red-tailed hawk, for which good life-history information, or toxicological data is<br />

available, may be used for modeling purposes and results may be extrapolated to the "mammal-eating hawk<br />

guild" as a whole. This allows the risk assessment models to directly evaluate species for which the best<br />

exposure information is available, but allows results to be extrapolated to a broader range of potential<br />

receptors, thereby maximizing data usage and applicability of results.<br />

Representatives in each identified receptor guild and trophic level are selected below. The fundamental<br />

assumption is that if the surrogate receptor is protected, the entire guild is protected. Deviations from this<br />

assumption are discussed further in the uncertainty section of this report.<br />

7.2.2.5 Selection of ROCs: Guild Representatives<br />

The broadest classifications of receptors selected for this ERA are aquatic and terrestrial plants and animals.<br />

Of the animals, fish, mammals, and birds are the three most prominent general groups at the site. Fish,<br />

using salrnonids as representative species, were selected as an ROC because they are an important valued<br />

resource and because they may provide food for certain birds and mammals, as well as recreation for<br />

humans. Benthic insects were also selected as ROCs because they are important food items for fish and<br />

some birds. Although periphyton is an important component of aquatic food chains, there are only a few<br />

reports of the effects of metals on these communities. Therefore, this trophic level will only be discussed<br />

briefly and qualitatively.<br />

Although amphibians may exist at the site, and may be at risk from metals contamination, there is very little<br />

toxicological data for these animals. The available mean toxicity data for amphibians exposed to cadmium,<br />

& MOORE<br />

c : \ ~ ~ ) ~ \ h 0 1 d r n - ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ . d o ~<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>,5:16 PM;DRAFT FlNAL RI REPORT<br />

7-44 DAMES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!