13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dcccmbcr 8, 1998<br />

Lagoon Soil Samplcs, Fall 1998, Holden Mint<br />

Page 3<br />

2. Initial Calibration - Acceptable<br />

3. Continuing Calibration - Acceptable<br />

4. Blanks - Acceptable<br />

5. Surrogate Recoveries<br />

Samples DMLG-1-4, DMLG-2-7 % , DMLG-3-2, DMLG-3-4, and DMLG-5-4 were reextracted due<br />

to low surrogate recoveries. The surrogate recoveries for the initial extraction and the reextraction are<br />

tabulated below:<br />

% Recovew Initial<br />

24.3<br />

% Recovew Reextract<br />

66<br />

Due to the low recoveries from the initial extraction, the results for data evaluation were selected<br />

from the reextraction although past the method hold time (see discussion under Hold Time).<br />

6. Laboratory Duplicate - Acceptable<br />

7. Matrix SpikeIMatrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD)<br />

A MSIMSD was performed on sample DMLG-3-2. Due to low surrogate recoveries for the<br />

original, MS, and MSD samples, the QC set was reextracted. Surrogate recoveries were acceptable in<br />

the reextracted QC set. However, the recovery of diesel spiked in the first MSIMSD was outside of the<br />

laboratory control limits (38 - 160%) as the spike concentration was not recovered. The spike recoveries<br />

from the reextracted MS and MSD were 73% and -41%, respectively. The sample concentration was<br />

about 4X the spike level. Data are not generally qualified based on MSIMSD results alone. The<br />

MSIMSD sample results'indicate a potential for variability related to sample DMLG-3-2. The data for this<br />

sample was previously qualified as estimated based on surrogate recoveries. Additional qualification<br />

based on MSIMSD results does not alter the estimated qualification already assigned.<br />

8. ~aboratory Control SampleIBlank Spike (LCSIBS) - Acceptable<br />

9. Field Duplicate<br />

A field duplicate was not collected.<br />

10. Target Compound Identification<br />

The sample results reporied as diesel and motor oil in samples DMLG-1-4, DMLG-2-4, DMLG-2-<br />

7%, DMLG-3-2, DMLG-3-4, DMLG-4-2, DMLG-4-4, DMLG-5-2, and DMLG-5-4 do not match typical<br />

diesel or motor oil profiles, although the patterns are indicative of a heavy hydrocarbon component. The<br />

diesel and motor oil reported in sample DMLG-1-2 are not indicative of typical diesel or motor oil<br />

patterns.<br />

11. Detection Limits - Acceptable<br />

12. Type of Review - Summary<br />

g:~olden\l998/dalavallvalY964.doc DAMES & MOORE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!