13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.? ) ,~@ .. '. ..,..<br />

r....,. ..,," - .. .. ....<br />

e \U)M~SEAI\VOL~\COMMOMWP\WPDATAV)OS\REPORTSWOLDEN-~UUU~<br />

The data collected at CC-Dl during May 1998 indicated similar trends detected in May 1997. Cadmium.<br />

copper, manganese, and zinc concentrations were greater than concentrations at CC-1. Concentrations of<br />

cadmium, copper, manganese, and zinc in 1998 were above 1997. Iron decreased from 230 pg/L in May<br />

1997 to not detected (< 20 pa) in May 1998.<br />

Historic data for the Copper Creek diversion is'lirnited to two samples collected by the USGS in 1994 and<br />

1996; however, this data generally hdicates that metals were not detected and provides little comparative<br />

information (Table 5.3-33).<br />

The Copper Creek diversion is primarily used to supply water to the sauna used by residents and guests of<br />

Holden Village. The water quality is included in the human health risk discussion in Section 7.0.<br />

5.3.6 Copper Creek<br />

Samples were collected at two locations, CC-1 and CC-2, within Copper Creek (Figure 5.3-2). Station CC-<br />

1 is located upstream and outside of the mine influence. Station CC-2 is located in Copper Creek prior to<br />

the confluence with Railroad Creek. The data is discussed below. The data collected at CC- I was included<br />

in the area background surface water quality assessment previously discussed (Section 5.3.1).<br />

5.3.6.1 Historical Data<br />

Water samples were collected at CC-1 and CC-2 during 1982 to 1983 (USFS 1983). The samples were<br />

analyzed for total metals and conventional parameters. Specific conductivity, pH, and temperature were<br />

measured in the field. Samples were collected by the USGS in 1994, 1995, and in the spring i d fall of<br />

1996. Two samples were collected at a location near CC-2 by Ecology in June and September 1996. The<br />

samples were analyzed for total recoverable and dissolved metals, conventional parameters, and field<br />

parameters. The analytical parameters were not consistent between sampling events. Sample data are<br />

summarized in Table 5.3-35.<br />

The 1982/1983 data were not compared to WQC or RI data due to the limited list of metals reported,<br />

detection limit differences, and unavailability of hardness values for criteria correction.<br />

The data collected by the USGS from 1994 through 1996 was not compared to WQC due to unavailable<br />

hardness values. Calcium and magnesium were available; however, in several instances the results are<br />

noted as not detected at high detection limits precluding hardness calculations. The data indicated that metal<br />

concentrations for CC-1 and CC-2 were relatively similar and did not tend to fluctuate with seasonal<br />

variations. Specific conductivity was generally low (20 to 40 ps); however, a 50% increase at both stations<br />

occurred in July 1995 (80 ps, 100 ps). The USGS data were compared to appropriate RI data. Where<br />

metals were detected, the data were relatively consistent. Field parameters were relatively consistent<br />

between historical and RI data.<br />

The data collected by Ecology was compared to WQC. Dissolved cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc<br />

concentrations did not exceed WQC. In general, the data from the two sampling events indicated that<br />

concentrations at this location do not fluctuate with seasonal differences. An increase in dissolved copper<br />

(1.2 pgL) in September 1996 appears to be anomalous as the total result was lower (0.23 pa). Field<br />

5-35<br />

17693405-019Wuly 28. <strong>1999</strong>;11:09 Ah4;DRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!