13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

deer mice fed only on plants growing in the UCL metal concentrations areas<br />

deer mice consumed soil equivalent to 2 percent of their plant ingestion rate<br />

deer mice drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled plant metal concentrations were accurate<br />

Table 7.2.4-9 shows that there is no risk to deer mice b m the consumption of plants growing at even the<br />

worst case locations. Therefore, there is no need to conduct further analyses of risk to this ROC.<br />

- Mink<br />

Hazard quotients for mink feeding on small mammals (Table 7.2.4-IOA) were calculated by diving the<br />

doses estimated in Table 7.2.3-14 by the TRVs in Table 7.2.3-4B. The default assumptions were:<br />

mink feed only on small mammals from locations where soil samples were collected<br />

mink feed only on small mammals found in the highest metal concentrations areas<br />

mink drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled small mammal metal concentrations were accurate<br />

Table 7.2.4-10A shows that mink feeding on small insectivorous mammals could be at risk from cadmium<br />

in the subsurface tailings piles, and the lagoon.<br />

Since mink are not restricted to feeding in only the worst case locations, risk was further characterized at<br />

median metals concentrations in small mammals. When mink were exposed to small mammals living on<br />

median subsurface soil concentrations there was no risk from the subsurface tailings (Table 7.2.4-IOB).<br />

However, because of the limited data for the lagoon and maintenance yard soils, it was not possible to<br />

further estimate risk in these areas. It should be noted however, that since the soils are probably toxic to<br />

plants and earthworms, it is likely that there is not a complete exposure pathways from small mammals to<br />

mink in these areas. Furthermore, since carnivorous animals are usually only about 10 percent as abundant<br />

and as herbivores, it is also unlikely that mink could feed 100 percent on insectivores. When the mink diet<br />

is 10 percent insectivores and 90 percent herbivores (or omnivores), there is no risk to mink even in the<br />

lagoon and maintenance yard.<br />

Red-Tailed Hawk<br />

Hazard quotients for red-tailed hawk feeding on small mammals (Table 7.2.4-1 1) were calculated by<br />

dividing the doses estimated in Table 7.2.3-16 by the TRVs in Table 7.2.3-4A. The default assumptions<br />

were:<br />

hawks feed only on small mammals from locations where soil samples were collected<br />

hawks feed only on small mammals found in the highest metal concentrations areas<br />

hawks drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled small mammal metal concentrations were accurate<br />

G:\~W)~ruUIoldco-2\n17QQdoc 7-68<br />

17693-00J-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5: 16 PWRAFT FINAL R1 REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!