18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

White River National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky Mountain Region (R2)<br />

Figure 5. Possible runoff changes predicted from down-scaled global circulation models for the Colorado River<br />

basin (Christensen and Lettenmaier 2006)<br />

In summary, there are three potential outcomes of the anticipated climate change exposure. Most<br />

importantly, runoff volumes are likely to decrease, potentially exacerbating low flow conditions. This<br />

would likely be accompanied by higher water demand for irrigation, associated with higher air<br />

temperatures. All signs suggest an inevitable conflict between the Aquatic Habitat and Water Uses<br />

resource values.<br />

Secondly, although the published exposure data make little reference to flood events, there appears to be a<br />

trend toward more extreme weather events. The possibility of higher and more frequent flood events<br />

would have a direct impact on the Infrastructure/roads resource value.<br />

Lastly, as noted previously, we have seen average air temperatures increase over the last 30 years, and the<br />

data suggest a continuation of that trend. This would logically translate to increases in stream<br />

temperatures. However, since Colorado River cutthroat are typically pushed to the upper limits of their<br />

range through competition with brook trout, their reproductive success can be limited by cold water<br />

temperatures. In this rare case, an increase in stream temperatures may actually work to their benefit. For<br />

119 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!