18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />

relative assessment of risk for recreation facilities. Results of the infrastructure rating (with the location of<br />

campgrounds within 300 ft of channels) are shown in Figure 6.<br />

Water Uses<br />

Water from the forest supports domestic, livestock, wildlife and fish, recreational, and agricultural uses<br />

downstream, and all watersheds within the analysis area are highly valued for this reason. Additionally,<br />

water for domestic use is captured by and delivered from the C.C. Cragen Reservoir. Substantial surface<br />

water is stored close to its source in stockponds or tanks, where it used for stock water and wildlife<br />

purposes. Numerous agricultural diversions exist on the lower reaches of Oak, Beaver, and West Clear<br />

Creeks and the Verde River.<br />

Ratings of relative subwatershed values for water uses were based on a combination of all these factors.<br />

The amount of water (acre ft) diverted in each watershed was determined, and subwatersheds with no<br />

diversions were given a low value, watersheds with less than 500 acre ft diverted (annually) were classed<br />

as moderate, and those with greater than 500 acre ft were rated as high. GIS was used to obtain a count of<br />

tanks per subwatershed. Subwatersheds were divided into three classes: those subwatersheds with 16 or<br />

fewer tanks were given the lowest value, those with 17 to 32 had moderate value, and those with more<br />

than 32 received the highest rating. Tanks and diversions were given equal weight, and were combined to<br />

produce a single water resource score. These values were then divided into thirds, with the highest third<br />

of subwatersheds given a rating of “high.” Finally, all subwatersheds that contribute flow to the C.C.<br />

Cragen reservoir were rated as high. The results of the water-uses rating are displayed in Figure 7.<br />

Riparian and Spring Habitats<br />

Relative to other areas of the country, the amount of aquatic and riparian habitat (including springs) on<br />

the CNF is limited. Riparian areas represent 0.7% of the area on the Forest. These spatially limited areas<br />

provide habitat for 80% of the Forest’s bird species, including neotropical species. Eighty percent of the<br />

Forest’s vertebrate species depend on riparian habitat for at least half of their life cycles. These habitats<br />

are vitally important as habitat for numerous reptiles and amphibians not listed above and other aquatic<br />

organisms, such as macroinvertebrates. Springs also provide habitat for aquatic and riparian species,<br />

including numerous endemic macroinvertebrate species.<br />

The relative value of subwatersheds for this resource was based on two data sources: miles of riparian<br />

habitat and the number of springs. GIS was used to determine the miles of riparian habitat in each<br />

subwatershed. As with other attributes, values for each watershed were ranked and then grouped into<br />

thirds, with subwatersheds with the most riparian habitat (>17 miles) given the highest scores. Forest GIS<br />

data for springs were used to determine the number of springs per watershed; these were then grouped<br />

into thirds. A riparian-spring rating was obtained by combining the subwatershed scores for the individual<br />

factors, with the riparian value given twice as much weight as the spring rating. To be clear, ratings of<br />

“high” were given a score of 3, and low ratings were given a score of 2. The combined scores were then<br />

ranked and divided into thirds, with the highest third rated as high value.<br />

138 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!