watervulnerability
watervulnerability
watervulnerability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />
relative assessment of risk for recreation facilities. Results of the infrastructure rating (with the location of<br />
campgrounds within 300 ft of channels) are shown in Figure 6.<br />
Water Uses<br />
Water from the forest supports domestic, livestock, wildlife and fish, recreational, and agricultural uses<br />
downstream, and all watersheds within the analysis area are highly valued for this reason. Additionally,<br />
water for domestic use is captured by and delivered from the C.C. Cragen Reservoir. Substantial surface<br />
water is stored close to its source in stockponds or tanks, where it used for stock water and wildlife<br />
purposes. Numerous agricultural diversions exist on the lower reaches of Oak, Beaver, and West Clear<br />
Creeks and the Verde River.<br />
Ratings of relative subwatershed values for water uses were based on a combination of all these factors.<br />
The amount of water (acre ft) diverted in each watershed was determined, and subwatersheds with no<br />
diversions were given a low value, watersheds with less than 500 acre ft diverted (annually) were classed<br />
as moderate, and those with greater than 500 acre ft were rated as high. GIS was used to obtain a count of<br />
tanks per subwatershed. Subwatersheds were divided into three classes: those subwatersheds with 16 or<br />
fewer tanks were given the lowest value, those with 17 to 32 had moderate value, and those with more<br />
than 32 received the highest rating. Tanks and diversions were given equal weight, and were combined to<br />
produce a single water resource score. These values were then divided into thirds, with the highest third<br />
of subwatersheds given a rating of “high.” Finally, all subwatersheds that contribute flow to the C.C.<br />
Cragen reservoir were rated as high. The results of the water-uses rating are displayed in Figure 7.<br />
Riparian and Spring Habitats<br />
Relative to other areas of the country, the amount of aquatic and riparian habitat (including springs) on<br />
the CNF is limited. Riparian areas represent 0.7% of the area on the Forest. These spatially limited areas<br />
provide habitat for 80% of the Forest’s bird species, including neotropical species. Eighty percent of the<br />
Forest’s vertebrate species depend on riparian habitat for at least half of their life cycles. These habitats<br />
are vitally important as habitat for numerous reptiles and amphibians not listed above and other aquatic<br />
organisms, such as macroinvertebrates. Springs also provide habitat for aquatic and riparian species,<br />
including numerous endemic macroinvertebrate species.<br />
The relative value of subwatersheds for this resource was based on two data sources: miles of riparian<br />
habitat and the number of springs. GIS was used to determine the miles of riparian habitat in each<br />
subwatershed. As with other attributes, values for each watershed were ranked and then grouped into<br />
thirds, with subwatersheds with the most riparian habitat (>17 miles) given the highest scores. Forest GIS<br />
data for springs were used to determine the number of springs per watershed; these were then grouped<br />
into thirds. A riparian-spring rating was obtained by combining the subwatershed scores for the individual<br />
factors, with the riparian value given twice as much weight as the spring rating. To be clear, ratings of<br />
“high” were given a score of 3, and low ratings were given a score of 2. The combined scores were then<br />
ranked and divided into thirds, with the highest third rated as high value.<br />
138 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change