watervulnerability
watervulnerability
watervulnerability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />
and sixth HUC watersheds without many water resources have not been assessed for climate<br />
vulnerability and will not inform sixth HUC WCF prioritization or projects outside of the WCF.<br />
2. Following the WVA process, watersheds without many water resources will have low value, even<br />
though climate change can significantly alter upland vegetation types. Thus, results are biased<br />
towards watersheds with many water resources. The process could be expanded to assess<br />
vulnerability of other resources to better assist management.<br />
3. We need to effectively present the framework so that Forest staff understand the process and do<br />
not have to start from scratch. It seems that the 6-step process varied somewhat between pilot<br />
Forests.<br />
4. Integration with the resource specialists was necessary to identify the resource values of concern,<br />
assess how potential hydrologic changes might affect the resources, and identify and weigh<br />
stressors and buffers.<br />
5. Need to be able to effectively address the time, cost, and relevance of performing a WVA to the<br />
leadership team to make it useful to managers.<br />
PROJECT TEAM<br />
The following team members contributed to this assessment:<br />
Amina Sena, CNF, hydrologist<br />
Mike Childs, CNF, fisheries<br />
Janie Agyagus, CNF, wildlife<br />
Ralph Martinez, Plumas NF, GIS<br />
Ken Roby, Lassen NF (retired)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Arizona Department of Water Resources. 2011. Arizona Water Atlas Volume 5: Central Highlands<br />
Planning Area.<br />
http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/CentralHighlands/default.htm<br />
Dominguez, F. and J. Cañon and J. Valdes. 2009. IPCC-AR4 climate simulations for the Southwestern<br />
US: the importance of future ENSO projections. Climatic Change DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9672-5<br />
Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges. 1994. A Simple hydrologically Based<br />
Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D7), 14,415-14,428.<br />
Littell, J.S., M.M. Elsner, G.S. Mauger, E.R. Lutz, A.F. Hamlet, and E.P. Salathé. 2011. Hydrologic<br />
Change in the Northern U.S. Rockies and Pacific Northwest: Internally Consistent Projections of Future<br />
Climate for Resource Management. Regional Climate and Preliminary project report, USFS JVA 09-JV-<br />
11015600-039. Prepared by the Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle.<br />
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1994. National Climatic Data Center. Mean Total<br />
Precipitation - Annual vector digital data. Available on line at: Server=geodata.library.arizona.edu;<br />
Service=5151; Database=atlas01; User=NCDC; Version=dbo.DEFAULT<br />
156 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change