18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Coconino National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Southwest Region (R3)<br />

and sixth HUC watersheds without many water resources have not been assessed for climate<br />

vulnerability and will not inform sixth HUC WCF prioritization or projects outside of the WCF.<br />

2. Following the WVA process, watersheds without many water resources will have low value, even<br />

though climate change can significantly alter upland vegetation types. Thus, results are biased<br />

towards watersheds with many water resources. The process could be expanded to assess<br />

vulnerability of other resources to better assist management.<br />

3. We need to effectively present the framework so that Forest staff understand the process and do<br />

not have to start from scratch. It seems that the 6-step process varied somewhat between pilot<br />

Forests.<br />

4. Integration with the resource specialists was necessary to identify the resource values of concern,<br />

assess how potential hydrologic changes might affect the resources, and identify and weigh<br />

stressors and buffers.<br />

5. Need to be able to effectively address the time, cost, and relevance of performing a WVA to the<br />

leadership team to make it useful to managers.<br />

PROJECT TEAM<br />

The following team members contributed to this assessment:<br />

Amina Sena, CNF, hydrologist<br />

Mike Childs, CNF, fisheries<br />

Janie Agyagus, CNF, wildlife<br />

Ralph Martinez, Plumas NF, GIS<br />

Ken Roby, Lassen NF (retired)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Arizona Department of Water Resources. 2011. Arizona Water Atlas Volume 5: Central Highlands<br />

Planning Area.<br />

http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/CentralHighlands/default.htm<br />

Dominguez, F. and J. Cañon and J. Valdes. 2009. IPCC-AR4 climate simulations for the Southwestern<br />

US: the importance of future ENSO projections. Climatic Change DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9672-5<br />

Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges. 1994. A Simple hydrologically Based<br />

Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D7), 14,415-14,428.<br />

Littell, J.S., M.M. Elsner, G.S. Mauger, E.R. Lutz, A.F. Hamlet, and E.P. Salathé. 2011. Hydrologic<br />

Change in the Northern U.S. Rockies and Pacific Northwest: Internally Consistent Projections of Future<br />

Climate for Resource Management. Regional Climate and Preliminary project report, USFS JVA 09-JV-<br />

11015600-039. Prepared by the Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle.<br />

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1994. National Climatic Data Center. Mean Total<br />

Precipitation - Annual vector digital data. Available on line at: Server=geodata.library.arizona.edu;<br />

Service=5151; Database=atlas01; User=NCDC; Version=dbo.DEFAULT<br />

156 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!