watervulnerability
watervulnerability
watervulnerability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chugach National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Alaska Region (R10)<br />
change are unlikely to decrease the success rate of salmonid egg incubation by the mechanism of increased<br />
channel bed scour.<br />
Thus, salmon spawning in the watershed may be less sensitive to scour even with the predicted increases<br />
in flows, but this depends on maintaining floodplain connectivity. While it may seem appealing to elevate<br />
the road bed of Power Creek Road so it is not subjected to flooding, this would constrict flows and<br />
possibly make downstream spawning areas more susceptible to scour.<br />
Aquatic Vegetation<br />
While increased atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and a longer growing season are generally expected to<br />
increase plant growth in Alaska (Haufler et al. 2010), site specific factors and individual species<br />
responses make it difficult to predict the overall effect in wetland communities (Poff et al. 2002). Eyak<br />
Lake already has large areas covered by aquatic plants, including various species of Potamogeton and the<br />
non-native Elodea canadensis. If these species respond positively to climate changes, there may be<br />
adverse effects to fish habitat.<br />
One potential effect is that increased amounts of vegetation could lead to greater biological oxygen<br />
demand under the winter ice when the plants die and decay. In areas where there are insufficient<br />
streamflows entering the lake, localized anoxic zones could develop. This risk could be reduced if warmer<br />
temperatures keep the lake surface ice-free for a greater part of the winter.<br />
Eyak Lake Watershed Management Recommendations<br />
The most important part of these climate change analyses should be determining what can and cannot be<br />
done, or at least what should or should not be done.<br />
Most of the current problems, stressors, and potential risks for the Eyak Lake watershed are outside of<br />
National Forest land or are issues not managed by the Forest Service. There are, however, some actions<br />
that can be taken either unilaterally by the Forest Service or in conjunction with cooperating agencies and<br />
organizations. For the values identified for the Eyak Lake watershed, protecting the salmon stocks and<br />
adopting measures to mitigate the predicted increase in flooding are the primary concerns.<br />
Forest Service Management<br />
The current Forest Plan manages most of the upper watershed as a “primitive” area, while other areas<br />
have restrictive covenants that were established when the land was purchased from a local Native Alaskan<br />
corporation. The area is not available for timber harvest, and while mineral development is conditional,<br />
there are no active claims and no known mineral resources. There are no Forest Service roads. No offroad<br />
vehicle use is permitted. Thus, management actions are limited, and with the relatively pristine state<br />
of the National Forest land, there may not be much that can be done to improve conditions in preparation<br />
for climate change.<br />
There have been suggestions that large woody debris (LWD) could be added to streams to moderate flows<br />
or provide refugia for juvenile fish, which could buffer the effects of predicted high flows or floods. This<br />
can be useful where natural sources of LWD have been removed or in highly disturbed areas (Bair et al.<br />
2002). However, Bakke (2008) points out that areas affected by climate change are likely to be unstable<br />
and any structures or stream engineering will have to be carefully designed to accommodate change.<br />
Redundant structures are recommended in anticipation that many structures may fail or may not have the<br />
intended effect.<br />
284 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change