18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sawtooth National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Intermountain Region (R4)<br />

management activities that cumulatively impact habitat annually. This assumption is supported by studies<br />

that found that populations in complex habitats are more stable than populations in simple ones because<br />

they have greater capacity to buffer the effects of environmental change (Schlosser 1982; Saunders et al.<br />

1990; Sedell et al. 1990; Schlosser 1991; Pearson et al. 1992). Neville et al. (2006) also showed that<br />

small, isolated populations were at increased risk of extinction because of demographic and genetic<br />

factors associated with their reduced population sizes and loss of interpopulation connectivity.<br />

There are, however, limitations with this approach, as follows<br />

1. Bull trout may persist in streams that commonly exceed their perceived thermal limits (Zoellick<br />

1999) because of increased availability of food, lack of competition with other species, or<br />

adaptations that better exploit thermal refugia or shift timing of life history transitions (Crozier<br />

and others 2008; Jonsson and Jonsson 2009).<br />

2. Baselines and management threats were assumed to remain at present levels. In reality, some<br />

threats will diminish due to restoration or changed management approaches, some will persist due<br />

to a lack of political/social will to change, and new unexpected threats will emerge. As a result,<br />

baseline conditions will also not stay constant.<br />

3. It was assumed that species and populations will continue to use and respond to the environment<br />

as they have in the recent past. In some instances, biological adaptation to changing environments<br />

could mitigate some of the challenges organisms face.<br />

4. Finally, there are many complex interactions between physical changes brought on by climate<br />

change and species’ responses to these changes. While the model is a good start, it oversimplifies<br />

these interactions and may inaccurately project future persistence.<br />

Figure 15. Bayesian belief network for determining bull trout population persistence<br />

Currently there are 14 patches in the Upper Salmon on the Sawtooth RNA that have reproducing bull<br />

trout populations. Bull trout in three of these patches are “functioning at unacceptable risk”, six patches<br />

are “functioning at risk,” and six are “functioning appropriately.” Populations in unacceptable or at-risk<br />

conditions are due to low population sizes, competition/hybridization risks with brook trout, poor habitat<br />

conditions, and/or moderate/high management risks. Bull trout populations in a better condition are<br />

characterized by relatively good habitat, larger populations, low to moderate management risks, and/or no<br />

brook trout present.<br />

174 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!