18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sawtooth National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Intermountain Region (R4)<br />

Overall<br />

Current 2040 2080<br />

HUC Name Infrastructure<br />

Amount<br />

Winter 95<br />

Risk<br />

Risk<br />

Winter 95<br />

Risk<br />

Risk<br />

Winter 95<br />

Risk<br />

Risk<br />

Alturas Lake L 0.21 L 1.77 M 4.55 M<br />

Beaver Creek M 0.70 M 3.43 H 5.55 H<br />

Beaver-Peach M 0.87 M 2.22 H 4.10 H<br />

Big Boulder Creek M 0.59 M 1.51 M 3.23 H<br />

Big Casino Creek L 4.14 M 3.69 M 5.24 M<br />

Big Lake Creek L 0.33 L 1.50 M 3.39 M<br />

Boundary-Cleveland M 0.98 M 1.32 M 1.98 M<br />

Cabin-Vat H 0.31 M 2.26 H 4.87 H<br />

Champion Creek M 0.42 L 2.72 H 4.79 H<br />

Elk Creek M 0.35 L 3.05 H 6.08 H<br />

Fisher Creek L 0.48 L 2.27 M 3.84 M<br />

Fishhook Creek L 1.79 M 4.18 M 6.60 M<br />

Fourth of July Creek H 0.38 M 1.67 H 3.53 H<br />

French-Spring L 0.40 L 1.63 M 3.28 M<br />

Germania Creek M 0.34 L 1.74 M 3.58 H<br />

Gold-Williams M 0.31 L 1.65 M 3.43 H<br />

Harden-Rough M 0.66 M 2.61 H 5.20 H<br />

Hell Roaring-Mays M 0.30 L 2.33 H 4.91 H<br />

Holman-Mill L 0.56 M 2.04 M 3.90 M<br />

Huckleberry Creek L 2.81 M 3.79 M 5.56 M<br />

Iron-Goat M 3.24 H 5.54 H 7.30 H<br />

Joes-Little Casino M 2.57 M 3.24 H 5.09 H<br />

Little Boulder Creek L 0.23 L 0.79 M 2.42 M<br />

Meadow Creek L 1.31 M 5.95 M 8.20 M<br />

Muley-Elk M 1.29 M 2.90 H 4.68 H<br />

Nip and Tuck-Sunny H 2.02 H 3.67 H 5.65 H<br />

Park-Hanna M 2.02 H 4.17 H 6.21 H<br />

Pettit Lake Creek M 0.22 L 2.53 H 5.45 H<br />

Pole Creek H 0.22 M 1.80 H 3.68 H<br />

Prospect-Robinson Bar L 0.77 M 2.60 M 4.28 M<br />

Redfish-Little Redfish L 0.90 M 4.44 M 7.29 M<br />

Sawtooth City-Frenchman M 0.41 L 2.79 H 5.05 H<br />

Slate Creek H 0.78 H 2.80 H 4.50 H<br />

Smiley Creek M 1.39 M 5.44 H 7.59 H<br />

Stanley Creek M 1.72 M 2.35 H 3.89 H<br />

Stanley Lake Creek M 0.89 M 5.07 H 8.04 H<br />

Sullivan-Clayton L 0.79 M 1.67 M 3.11 M<br />

Swimm-Martin L 0.93 M 3.30 M 4.96 M<br />

Upper EF Salmon M 0.57 M 1.72 M 3.37 H<br />

Upper Redfish Lake Creek L 0.28 L 2.49 M 5.32 M<br />

Upper Salmon River L 0.50 M 2.46 M 4.80 M<br />

Upper Warm Spring Creek L 0.27 L 1.56 M 3.25 M<br />

Warm-Taylor M 0.30 L 1.18 M 2.79 H<br />

West Pass Creek L 0.13 L 0.69 M 2.47 M<br />

Wickiup-Sheep M 0.32 L 1.19 M 2.21 H<br />

Yellow Belly Lake Creek L 0.01 L 0.12 M 0.38 L<br />

Table 7. Infrastructure risks by subwatershed from increased winter peak flows<br />

* Green shaded = low risk; Yellow shaded = moderate risk; and Orange shaded = high risk<br />

179 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!