watervulnerability
watervulnerability
watervulnerability
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chequamegon-‐Nicolet National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Eastern Region (R9)<br />
Additional research should be conducted regarding the thermal requirements and tolerance of cool water<br />
fish, to better clarify their vulnerability to warming and potential management options. This work should<br />
be supported by the CNNF and US Forest Service. The CNNF stream segment classification system<br />
should be used to better identify existing cool water stream habitat.<br />
The CNNF should continue to (1) implement best management practices for water quality, (2) practice<br />
sound watershed management, and (3) restore streams (e.g. properly replace stream crossings that<br />
impound water or prevent fish passage, restore streams impacted by log drives, manage beaver in critical<br />
habitat) to improve their resilience to climate change impacts.<br />
The CNNF should also continue to monitor stream temperatures across a variety of stream types to (1),<br />
gather year round temperature data, (2) provide up-to-date data on current stream temperatures, (3) more<br />
accurately identify vulnerable streams, (4) establish trends in stream temperature, and (5) facilitate more<br />
accurate modeling of response to climate change.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Boelter, D.H. and E.S. Verry. 1977. Peatland and Water in the northern Lake States. USDA Forest<br />
Service General Technical Report NC-31, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 22 p.<br />
Brooks, K.N., S.Y. Lu and T.V.W. McAdams. 1995. User Manual for Peatland Hydrologic Impact<br />
Model (PHIM), Version 4. College of Natural Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108,<br />
150 p.<br />
Dripps, W.R. and K.R. Bradbury, K.R.. 2007. A simple daily soil-water balance model for estimating<br />
the spatial and temporal distribution of groundwater recharge in temperate humid areas. J. of<br />
Hydrogeology 15: 433-444.<br />
Eggers, S.D. and D.M. Reed. 1987. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and<br />
Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, St. Paul, MN, 201 p.<br />
Guertin, D.P., P.K. Barten and K.N. Brooks. 1987. The Peatland Hydrologic Impact Model:<br />
Development and Testing. Nordic Hydrology 18, p. 79-100.<br />
Hawkinson, C.F. and E.S. Verry. 1975. Specific Conductance Identifies Perched and Ground Water<br />
Lakes. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-120, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul,<br />
MN, 5 p.<br />
Lyons, J., J. S. Stewart and M. Mitro. 2010. Predicted effects of climate warming on the distribution of<br />
50 stream fishes in Wisconsin, U.S.A. J. of Fish Biology 77:1867-1898.<br />
McAdams, T.V., K.N. Brooks and E.S. Verry. 1993. Modeling Water Table Response to Climate<br />
Change in a Northern Minnesota Peatland. In: Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems<br />
Symposium, July 21-23, 1993, ASCE, Park City, Utah, p. 358-365.<br />
Urie, Dean. 1977. Groundwater differences on pine and hardwoods forests of the Udell Experimental<br />
Forest in Michigan. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-145, North Central Forest Experiment<br />
Station, St. Paul, MN, 12 p.<br />
264 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change