18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chequamegon-­‐Nicolet National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Eastern Region (R9)<br />

Additional research should be conducted regarding the thermal requirements and tolerance of cool water<br />

fish, to better clarify their vulnerability to warming and potential management options. This work should<br />

be supported by the CNNF and US Forest Service. The CNNF stream segment classification system<br />

should be used to better identify existing cool water stream habitat.<br />

The CNNF should continue to (1) implement best management practices for water quality, (2) practice<br />

sound watershed management, and (3) restore streams (e.g. properly replace stream crossings that<br />

impound water or prevent fish passage, restore streams impacted by log drives, manage beaver in critical<br />

habitat) to improve their resilience to climate change impacts.<br />

The CNNF should also continue to monitor stream temperatures across a variety of stream types to (1),<br />

gather year round temperature data, (2) provide up-to-date data on current stream temperatures, (3) more<br />

accurately identify vulnerable streams, (4) establish trends in stream temperature, and (5) facilitate more<br />

accurate modeling of response to climate change.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Boelter, D.H. and E.S. Verry. 1977. Peatland and Water in the northern Lake States. USDA Forest<br />

Service General Technical Report NC-31, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 22 p.<br />

Brooks, K.N., S.Y. Lu and T.V.W. McAdams. 1995. User Manual for Peatland Hydrologic Impact<br />

Model (PHIM), Version 4. College of Natural Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108,<br />

150 p.<br />

Dripps, W.R. and K.R. Bradbury, K.R.. 2007. A simple daily soil-water balance model for estimating<br />

the spatial and temporal distribution of groundwater recharge in temperate humid areas. J. of<br />

Hydrogeology 15: 433-444.<br />

Eggers, S.D. and D.M. Reed. 1987. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and<br />

Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, St. Paul, MN, 201 p.<br />

Guertin, D.P., P.K. Barten and K.N. Brooks. 1987. The Peatland Hydrologic Impact Model:<br />

Development and Testing. Nordic Hydrology 18, p. 79-100.<br />

Hawkinson, C.F. and E.S. Verry. 1975. Specific Conductance Identifies Perched and Ground Water<br />

Lakes. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-120, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul,<br />

MN, 5 p.<br />

Lyons, J., J. S. Stewart and M. Mitro. 2010. Predicted effects of climate warming on the distribution of<br />

50 stream fishes in Wisconsin, U.S.A. J. of Fish Biology 77:1867-1898.<br />

McAdams, T.V., K.N. Brooks and E.S. Verry. 1993. Modeling Water Table Response to Climate<br />

Change in a Northern Minnesota Peatland. In: Management of Irrigation and Drainage Systems<br />

Symposium, July 21-23, 1993, ASCE, Park City, Utah, p. 358-365.<br />

Urie, Dean. 1977. Groundwater differences on pine and hardwoods forests of the Udell Experimental<br />

Forest in Michigan. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NC-145, North Central Forest Experiment<br />

Station, St. Paul, MN, 12 p.<br />

264 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!