18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky<br />

Mountain Region (R2)<br />

Infrastructure Values<br />

Infrastructure includes roads, trails, culverts, bridges, recreation developments, and other structures that<br />

have been constructed for some purpose. Infrastructure associated with stream channels, floodplains, and<br />

riparian areas was believed to be most vulnerable to changes in timing or magnitude of stream flow. The<br />

NHD flowline data were used to identify stream courses. Floodplains and riparian areas were identified<br />

using the Forest riparian habitat layer (created from aerial photo interpretation to identify wetlands, fens,<br />

waterbodies, and 100-foot buffer of perennial streams).<br />

The infrastructure values evaluated in this WVA are listed below, along with the metric used to rank these<br />

values by watershed. Note: Data for riparian areas, roads and trails, recreation developments, and<br />

recreation residences were limited to National Forest System lands and what is available in USFS<br />

databases. Stream network information extended off-Forest. The discrepancies in data extent means the<br />

confidence in results varies for subwatersheds that are completely or mostly within the GMUG as<br />

compared to those subwatersheds that extend beyond the GMUG boundary or that have developments on<br />

private inholdings.<br />

Road and Trail Stream Crossings - number of open road and trail crossings per miles of perennial and<br />

intermittent streams within a given subwatershed. Stream crossings were determined by intersecting<br />

perennial and intermittent streams with existing and open roads and trails. Figure 5 shows where these<br />

stream crossings occur. The crossing count for a given subwatershed was then divided by the miles of<br />

perennial and intermittent streams for that same subwatershed, to get a count of crossings per mile of<br />

perennial and intermittent streams within a given subwatershed. Counts of crossings per mile of perennial<br />

and intermittent streams by subwatershed ranged from 0 to 1.2.<br />

Note: The NHD Flowline and the roads and trails layers are approximations and the resulting intersection<br />

point layer is not necessarily an accurate representation of all actual crossings. This information also does<br />

not identify if the crossing is a culvert, a bridge, or a ford. Existing culvert and bridge inventories are not<br />

complete. These are data gaps that need to be addressed in the future.<br />

70 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!