18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sawtooth National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Intermountain Region (R4)<br />

Current Low Risk Populations - By 2040,<br />

three bull trout populations are still at low<br />

risk, nine populations are at moderate, and<br />

two are at high risk of extinction (Table 5<br />

and Figure 16). Two populations at low<br />

extinction risk (Germania and Upper Warm<br />

Spring Creeks) have low risk from climate<br />

change (i.e., frequency of winter peak flows<br />

averaging 1.4 days, summer baseflows<br />

averaging a 7% decrease, and summer water<br />

temperatures changing very little). The other<br />

low extinction risk population (Swimm-<br />

Martin) is projected to have moderate<br />

climate-change risks (i.e., frequency of<br />

winter peak flows averaging 2.4 days,<br />

summer baseflows averaging a 9% decrease,<br />

and summer water temperatures changing<br />

very little), but has good watershed that<br />

should give the population enough resiliency<br />

to withstand the predicted changes. By 2080,<br />

all of these populations are predicted to be subjected to a greater frequency of winter peak flows (avg.<br />

3.4), lower summer baseflows (avg. 28% decrease), and water temperatures outside optimal conditions<br />

for bull trout in lower portions of each patch. However, only the Germania population goes to a moderate<br />

risk of extinction from increasing effects of system roads in the headwaters and water diversions lower in<br />

the drainage, due to climate change.<br />

Current Moderate Risk Populations - Four populations (Big Boulder, Little Boulder, West Pass, and<br />

Fourth of July Creeks) are at moderate risk more from current and historic management impacts and<br />

moderate watershed conditions, than from climate change. This does not imply that there are no climate<br />

change impacts predicted by 2040 within<br />

these populations. There are still moderate<br />

increases in winter peak flows (avg. 0.9 days),<br />

and small changes to summer baseflows (avg.<br />

8% decrease to 15% increase) and minor<br />

water temperature increases. However, these<br />

changes are not enough to increase extinction<br />

risks. The remaining five bull trout<br />

populations (Alturas Lake, Fishhook,<br />

Prospect-Robinson Bar, Upper EF Salmon,<br />

and Wickiup-Sheep) are projected to see a<br />

greater frequency of winter peak flow events<br />

(avg. 1.6 days), less baseflow (avg. 19%<br />

decrease) and slightly warmer water<br />

temperatures that may limit the use of habitat<br />

Figure 17. Predicted bull trout persistence in 2080. Red<br />

subwatersheds are at high extinction risk; yellow are at<br />

moderate risk, and green are at low risk.<br />

175 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change<br />

Figure 16. Predicted bull trout persistence in 2040. Red<br />

subwatersheds are at high extinction risk; yellow are at moderate<br />

risk, and green are at low risk.<br />

during portions of the summer. By 2080<br />

extinction risks increase to most of the above<br />

bull trout populations as the frequency winter<br />

peak flows and summer water temperatures<br />

increase and summer baseflows continue to decrease (Figure 17). One additional local bull trout<br />

population (Wickiup-Sheep) is projected to be at high risk; nine are predicted to be at moderate risk, and<br />

two are predicted to be at low risk of extinction (Table 5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!