18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Helena National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Northern Region (R1)<br />

Exposure<br />

Many parameters influence the timing and magnitude of runoff for a given watershed. Average winter<br />

precipitation and average maximum winter temperature were initially analyzed to determine watershed<br />

exposure to changes in climate variables.<br />

Precipitation average over the entire forest is projected to increase slightly. All elevations on the forest are<br />

above approximately 3,500 feet. The average elevation is approximately 6,200 feet and the maximum<br />

elevation approximately 9,500 feet. Precipitation is predicted to increase in the winter, spring and fall and<br />

decrease in the summer season.<br />

Projected maximum winter temperatures (Dec-Jan-Feb) for the Helena National Forest for the 2040s time<br />

period are expected to increase. The average temperature across all HUCs went from 0 °C historically to<br />

1.3 °C projected for the 2040s time period. Temperatures are expected to remain relatively cold with the<br />

average maximum winter temperature not exceeding 3 °C for any individual watershed. Temperature is<br />

predicted to continue to increase into the 2080s time period where the average maximum winter<br />

temperature for all watersheds is predicted to be near 3 °C. Hamlet and Lettenamaier, 2007, found<br />

through a series of models of the northwestern United States, that cold river basins, where snow processes<br />

dominate the annual hydrologic cycle (< 6 °C average in midwinter), typically show reductions in flood<br />

risk due to overall reductions in spring snowpack. The Helena National Forest is well below 6 °C average<br />

midwinter and may see reductions in spring runoff flows for this reason.<br />

Since changes in summer and winter temperature are not expected to have a direct effect on infrastructure<br />

and development, change in watershed snowpack (the ratio of April 1 st SWE to Oct-Mar precipitation)<br />

was the only climate factor used to assess exposure. This value has been calculated using downscaled<br />

climate and hydrologic projections for the entire Columbia, upper Missouri and upper Colorado basins.<br />

Figures 7 and 8 show predicted watershed snowpack vulnerability (Littell et al.) watershed for the 2030-<br />

2059 and 2070-2099 time periods, respectively. Both the North Fork of the Blackfoot River and The<br />

Landers Fork watersheds are projected to see the most change in snowpack.<br />

58 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!