18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for evaluations conducted in Regions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. The<br />

GMUG NFs used projections from CIG, and additional<br />

projections for the Upper Gunnison River (Barsugli<br />

and Mearns Draft 2010). In retrospect, providing data<br />

available from CIG at the outset would have expedited<br />

some analyses and greatly assisted the process.<br />

Increases in temperature (ºF) Percent change in precipitation<br />

B1 2050 B1 2080 A1B 2050 A1B 2080 B1 2050 B1 2080 A1B 2050 A1B 2080<br />

January 2.70 4.42 4.38 6.00 (0.69) 8.85 5.98 1.68<br />

February 3.50 4.01 4.46 5.19 (0.97) (4.50) (2.54) (1.24)<br />

March 3.46 4.25 4.70 5.74 (0.75) (4.30) 0.63 (5.17)<br />

April 2.99 4.46 4.49 5.93 5.42 2.45 (1.19) 0.67<br />

May 3.68 4.48 5.02 7.16 (8.46) (1.28) (6.26) (10.68)<br />

June 3.90 4.64 5.34 7.04 (5.87) (7.17) (8.76) (12.37)<br />

July 4.14 4.98 5.40 7.28 (8.34) (2.70) (7.39) (12.84)<br />

August 4.13 5.04 5.21 6.84 1.20 6.97 1.52 2.61<br />

September 4.23 5.49 5.35 7.45 (0.49) 1.10 (3.47) 1.32<br />

October 4.12 5.46 5.29 7.15 (13.81) (8.17) (9.75) (8.17)<br />

November 3.52 4.36 4.93 6.15 0.91 (5.08) (7.93) (8.75)<br />

December 3.18 4.40 4.11 5.97 5.20 (9.39) (1.69) (1.68)<br />

Annual 3.63 4.67 4.89 6.49 (2.22) (1.93) (3.40) (4.55)<br />

Table 2. Modeled exposure data from the Ouachita NF assessment showing monthly and annual changes in temperature<br />

and precipitation derived from the B1 and A1B climate scenarios and provided by The Nature Conservancy Climate<br />

Change Wizard. Decreases in precipitation are in parentheses.<br />

Legend<br />

2000 - 2009<br />

Resurrection Creek<br />

649 - 958<br />

958 - 1,099<br />

1,099 - 1,187<br />

1,187 - 1,308<br />

1,308 - 1,438<br />

Mean 985.28<br />

Legend<br />

9 | ASSESSING THE VULNERABILITY OF WATERSHEDS TO CLIMATE CHANGE<br />

2020 - 2029<br />

Resurrection Creek<br />

683 - 998<br />

998 - 1,099<br />

1,099 - 1,187<br />

1,187 - 1,308<br />

1,308 - 1,438<br />

Mean 1,017.5<br />

In Region 2, the White River NF used projections supplied<br />

by the Colorado Water Conservation Boards (Ray et al.<br />

2008, Spears et al. 2009). The Shasta-Trinity NFs (Region<br />

5) utilized the World Climate Research Programme's<br />

Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3<br />

(CMIP3) multi-model dataset. This is a downscaled<br />

global temperature modeling output available from the<br />

University of California, Santa Barbara. The Ouachita<br />

Legend<br />

2050 - 2059<br />

Resurrection Creek<br />

775 - 998<br />

958 - 1,099<br />

1,099 - 1,187<br />

1,187 - 1,308<br />

1,308 - 1,438<br />

Mean 1,115.62<br />

Figure 7. An example of a downscaled, gridded projection of future climate conditions. The maps display projected<br />

precipitation (mm). The projections are based on the A1B model. The figure is from the Chugach NF WVA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!