18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky<br />

Mountain Region (R2)<br />

Figure 11. Instream Flow Water Rights<br />

Other water uses, such as water dependent recreation (fishing, rafting, kayaking), were initially<br />

considered but eventually eliminated from the WVA because they were either limited in their distribution<br />

or were represented by other values (e.g., fishing would occur where cold water fisheries are present).<br />

As with the infrastructure values, above, water use value metrics were designed to compare<br />

subwatersheds in a more relative way. For each individual water use value, the results were standardized<br />

(results for each subwatershed were divided by the largest result of all the subwatersheds). The<br />

standardized results for each water use value were then summed to get a cumulative water use value<br />

(water rights quantification + water rights structure + Surface Source Water Protection Areas + instream<br />

flow water rights = Water Uses Value Ranking). The cumulative Water Uses Value Rankings were<br />

classified into quartiles. The top 25% were classified 3 (high), middle 50% were classified 2 (moderate),<br />

lowest 25% were classified 1 (low). Figure 12 shows the resulting Water Uses Values Ranking.<br />

77 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!