18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chequamegon-­‐Nicolet National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Eastern Region (R9)<br />

The relative vulnerability of each HUC-6 to climate impacts on wetlands is presented in Figure 11. There<br />

were 38 watersheds with low vulnerability because of low percentages of both total and acid wetlands.<br />

There were 82 HUC-6s classified as having moderate vulnerability. There were 19 watersheds classified<br />

as having high vulnerability and also 19 watersheds classified as having very high vulnerability because<br />

of high percentages of both total and acid wetlands. They are located primarily in glacial till landforms<br />

with loam or silt soils.<br />

Groundwater Recharge<br />

Average potential recharge varied substantially across the area. For 1971-1990, it generally ranged from 0<br />

to 15 inches per year and for 2046-2065 it tended to range from 0-20 inches per year. The average<br />

differences (future minus historic) for each pixel were mostly in the range of -1 to +2 inches (Figure 12).<br />

The average potential recharge increased 0.54 inches from 7.81 to 8.35 inches for the entire area covered<br />

by the Park Falls HUC-6s (Table 3). This represents a 6.9 percent increase in potential groundwater<br />

recharge. While not large, this could have a significant effect over time on some groundwater dependent<br />

resources.<br />

Figure 10. Percentage of total and acid wetlands for portions of HUC-6 watersheds within the<br />

Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest derived from ecological land type inventory mapping<br />

247 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!