18.01.2013 Views

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

watervulnerability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Assessment, Rocky<br />

Mountain Region (R2)<br />

Projected Climate Change Anticipated Hydrologic Response<br />

More intense storms<br />

Warmer atmosphere has potential for<br />

increase in frequency and magnitude of<br />

big storms.<br />

More frequent and longer periods of<br />

drought<br />

Increase winter dust deposition on<br />

snowpack<br />

• Localized flooding<br />

• Increased debris flows<br />

• Increased hillslope and channel<br />

erosion<br />

• Less soil moisture<br />

• Reduced groundwater recharge<br />

• Lower summer and fall<br />

baseflow<br />

• Accentuate changes to<br />

snowpack melt<br />

91 Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change<br />

Potential Consequences to<br />

Resource Values<br />

• Increased risk to channel and<br />

floodplain infrastructure<br />

from sediment and high<br />

flows<br />

• Increased concern for public<br />

safety<br />

• Increased selenium load in<br />

streams where Mancos Shale<br />

exposure is significant.<br />

• Increased erosion associated<br />

with natural disturbances<br />

associated with drought (e.g.,<br />

fire)<br />

• Increased plant stress and<br />

susceptibility to insect and<br />

disease mortality<br />

• Reduced groundwater<br />

contribution to baseflows<br />

• Reduced discharge from<br />

springs<br />

• Reduced wetland/riparian<br />

function<br />

• Similar to warmer winter<br />

consequences<br />

Table 4. Projected climate changes to the GMUG NF, anticipated hydrologic response and potential consequences<br />

to aquatic resource values<br />

WATERSHED RISK<br />

Inherent characteristics and past management of watersheds influence how a watershed is likely to be<br />

affected by climate change, and when combined, can be considered as contributors to watershed risk.<br />

Some characteristics and/or impacts from past activities may exacerbate the anticipated impacts of<br />

climate change (stressors), while others may reduce the impacts of climate change (buffers).<br />

Inherent characteristics of watersheds were evaluated as two types of sensitivities on the GMUG: 1)<br />

sensitivity to erosion or sediment production, and 2) sensitivity to runoff response. Existing condition was<br />

evaluated based on past management activities. (The GMUG has not yet completed the new watershed<br />

condition classification, as directed by the Washington Office.)<br />

Sensitivities are described below.<br />

Erosion or Sediment Production Sensitivity<br />

The erosion or sediment production sensitivity was initially developed as part of the watershed<br />

assessment completed for the Forest plan revision. Characteristics of geology, soils, landforms and<br />

topography that affect the erosion potential or amount of sediment production from a given subwatershed<br />

were evaluated. Due to data limitations of some information, this evaluation was limited to lands within<br />

the GMUG Forest boundary. Mass wasting potential was not available at the time of the Forest plan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!