29.11.2014 Views

#1(36)'13

#1(36)'13

#1(36)'13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARTICLE 316/1 OF THE CIVIL<br />

CODE OF GEORGIA –<br />

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION<br />

OR LEGAL GROUNDS FOR<br />

CLAIM?<br />

GIORGI AMIRANASHVILI<br />

Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Faculty of Law, Master Student<br />

Law of obligations is the biggest and the most important part of the civil law.<br />

General part of the law of obligations has a significant role in private law. General<br />

provisions about obligations start with Article 316 and point 1, Id presents the<br />

concept of obligation.<br />

In the opinion of German lawyers, this norm is not grounds for a claim, but it<br />

gives statutory interpretation of an obligational relation. Therefore, it appears<br />

that its purpose is only limited with introduction of the concept, which is disputable.<br />

The thing is that this norm does not describe facts, but it defines actions. Therefore,<br />

law is made of normative regulations. The latter establish implementation of certain<br />

actions or abstaining from the action. Even if we assume that this norm only<br />

provides the concept of obligation, it appears that those regulations that exist in<br />

the civil code that contain concept interpretations, do not have normative purpose,<br />

which does not correspond to the truth.<br />

Therefore, the goal of the article is to conduct critical analysis of different<br />

opinions existing in the literature and to try to establish what purpose the Article<br />

316/1 serves in reality.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!