#1(36)'13

marTlmsajuleba
N1
da
kanoni
politikis gamovlinebaa. 36 ra Tqma unda, es argumentacia mkafiod dasabuTebulia. haagis 1954
wlis konvenciis monawile saxelmwifoebma unda SeimuSaon aRniSnuli terminebis erTiani unificirebuli
SefasebiTi kriteriumebi SeiaraRebuli konfliqtebis dros da ganamtkicon igi saer-
TaSoriso humanitaruli samarTlis normebSi. SesaZlebelia imis Tqmac, rom msgavsi TvalTaxedva
farTod aisaxa sxvadasxva mecnierul kvlevaSi. saerTod, momavalSi imedi unda viqonioT, rom
zemoaRniSnuli formulireba kidev bevrjer gaxdeba saerTaSoriso samarTlis mecnier-iuristTa
msjelobis sagani da erTsa da imave monacemebze dakvirvebis Sedegad, imedia, mokamaTe mxareebi
sruliad sapirispiro daskvnebamde ar mivlen.
SeniSvnebi:
1
konvencias saqarTvelo 1993 wlis 4 Tebervals SeuerTda.
2
konvenciis oficialuri teqstis naxva SesaZlebelia Semdeg misamarTze:
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13637&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION
=201.html; http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/400 [moZiebulia: 25/09/2012].
3
wiTeli jvris saerTaSoriso komitetis iuridiuli ganyofilebis
iuridiuli mrCevlis Jan fransua kegineris statia „usafrTxoebis zomebi
saomari moqmedebebis maregulirebeli samarTlis mixedviT~, 2006 wlis
dekemberSi gamoqveynda komitetis saerTaSoriso JurnalSi (#864) da
mogvawoda saqarTveloSi wiTeli jvris saerTaSoriso komitetis
TanamSromelma qalbatonma nino gvaramaZem.
4
ix.: Ìàèíåòòè Â., Íîâûå ïåðñïåêòèâû äëÿ çàùèòû êóëüòóðíûõ öåííîñòåé â ñëó÷àå
âîîðóæåííîãî êîíôëèêòà: âñòóïëåíèå â ñèëó Âòîðîãî ïðîòîêîëà ê Ãààãñêîé êîíâåíöèè
1954 ã., Ìåæäóíàðîäíûé æóðíàë Êðàñíîãî Êðåñòà, 2004, ¹854, 50.
5
ix.: Craig J.S. Forrest. The Doctrine of Military Necessity and the Protection of Cultural
Property During Armed Conflicts. California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 37,
Spring 2007, Number 2, 196.
6
me-8 muxlis me-6 punqtiT specialuri dacvis qveS myofi faseulobebi
eqvemdebarebian registracias da iuneskos generaluri direqtoris mier
specialur reestrSi Setanas, rac kidev ufro ganamtkicebs maT
xelSeuxeblobas anu imunitets da gamoricxavs Zalismieri aqtebis
ganxorcielebas am obieqtebisadmi. termini „imuniteti~ kulturuli
faseulobebis mimarT pirvelad, swored, 1954 wlis konvenciam gamoiyena da
garkveuli instituciuri meqanizmebic daawesa.
7
detalurad ix.: Henckaert Jean-Marie. New rules for the protection of cultural property
in armed conflict.International Review of the Red Cross, No.835,593-620 (1999 wels
saerTaSoriso diplomatiur konferenciaze, haagis 1954 wlis konvenciis
meore damatebiTi oqmis miRebisas, Jan-mari henkaerti warmoadgenda
wiTeli jvris saerTaSoriso komitets).
8
Jenevis 1949 wlis konvenciebSi (I konvenciis 33-e, 34-e da 50-e muxlebi; I I
konvenciis 28-e muxli; I I I konvenciis 126-e muxli; IV konvenciis 49-e, 57-e,
108-e, da 143-e muxlebi) gvxvdeba cneba „ukiduresi samxedro
aucilebloba~, 1977 wlis damatebiT oqmebSi (I damatebiTi oqmis 54-e
muxlis me-5 punqti, 62-e, 67-e da 71-e muxlebi) „imperatiuli samxedro
aucilebloba~ da „ukiduresi samxedro aucilebloba~. konvenciebsa da I da
I I damatebiT oqmebs saqarTvelo SeuerTda 1994 wlis 14 marts, 2005 wlis I I I
damatebiT oqms 2007 wlis 19 marts.
9
ix.: Chadha N.Protection Of Cultural Property During Armed Conflict: Recent Developments,
www.worldlii.org/int/journals/ISILYBIHRL/2001/12.rtf [moZiebulia: 6/10/2012].
10
ix.: SerisicM.Protection of Cultural Property in Time of Armed Conflict.
NetherlandsYearbook ofInternationalLaw, 1996, Vol.26, 3-14.
11
ix.: Merryman J.H. Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property. American Journal of
International Law,1986, Vol.80, 838-841.
38