Evaluarea ecosistemelor si a serviciilor ecosistemice din Romania

• yPotschin, Marion B., Eeva Primmer, Eeva Furman, and Roy H. Haines-Young. ‘Have Ecosystem
Services Been Oversold? A Response to Silvertown’, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31:
334-35.
• yPopa, B., S. A. Borz, M. D. Nita, F. Ioras, E Iordache, * , F. Borlea, R. Pache, and I. V. Abrudan.
2016. ‘Forest
• yPopa, B., C. Coman, S. A. Borz, M. D. Nita, C. Codreanu, G. Ignea, V Marinescu, F. Ioras,
and O Ionescu. 2013. ‘Total Economic Value of Natural Capital-A Case-Study of Piatra
Craiului National Park’, Notulae Botanici Horti Agrobotanici, 41.
• yPopescu, R-I, and Andrea Zamfir. 2011. “Strategic Role of Ecotourism for Romania’s Regional
Development.” In The Scale of Globalization. Think globally. Act locally. Change individually
in the 21 century. . Ostrava: University of Ostrava.
• yPrimmer, Eeva, Pekka Jokinen, Malgorzata Blicharska, David N. Barton, Rob Bugter, and
Marion Potschin. 2015. ‘Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical
analysis’, Ecosystem Services, 16: 158-66.
• yPwC. 2016. “The forestry and wood processing industry in Romania has a contribution of
3.5% to the GDP when taking into consideration the indirect effects as well, according to a
PwC Romania study.” In. PwC Romania.
• yRobbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. (MacMillan:
London).
• yRusch, G.M., N. Valland, M. De Stefano, F. Hanssen, R. Vang, B. Pedersen, and E. Aronsen.
2017. ‘Environmental data management. Policies and examples of their implementation in
Norway. National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA), Bucharest, pp. 1-44.’.
• ySandel, Michael J. 2013. ‘Market Reasoning as Moral Reasoning: Why Economists Should
Re-engage with Political Philosophy’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27: 121-40.
• ySârbu A. (coord.), 2003, Ghid pentru identificarea importantelor arii de protecție și
conservare a plantelor din România., Ed. Alo, Bucuresti, 113 p;
• ySchröter, Matthias, R. Kraemer, S. Ceasu, and G.M. Rusch. 2017. ‘Incorporating threat in
hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services. ‘, Ambio.
• ySen, A. 1979. “Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at
Stanford University 22 May ,1979.” In, edited by Stanford University.
• ySilvertown, Jonathan. 2015. ‘Have Ecosystem Services Been Oversold?’, Trends in Ecology
& Evolution, 30: 641-48.
• ySpash, Clive L. 2006. ‘Non-economic motivation for contingent values: Rights and attitudinal
beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements’, Land Economics, 82:
602-22.
• yStancioiu, P. T., I. V. Abrudan, and I. Dutca. 2010. ‘The Natura 2000 ecological network and
forests in Romania: implications on management and administration’, The International
Forestry Review, 12: 106-13.
• yTEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics
of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
• yTerrestrial habitat mapping in Europe: an overview EEA Technical report No 1/2014;
• yTowards a Pan-European Ecosystem Assessment Methodology, EEA Report, 2013
• yVass, Miriam Münnich, and Katarina Elofsson. 2016. ‘Is forest carbon sequestration at the
expense of bioenergy and forest products cost-efficient in EU climate policy to 2050?’,
Journal of Forest Economics, 24: 82-105.
• yVatn, Arild. 2005. ‘Institutions and the Environment’, Land Economics, 82: 316-19.
• yVeen, Peter, Josef Fanta, Ivan Raev, Iovu-Adrian Biriş, Jacques de Smidt, and Bert Maes.
2010. ‘Virgin forests in Romania and Bulgaria: results of two national inventory projects
and their implications for protection’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 19: 1805-19.
• yWorld Bank. 2015. “Romania-Toward a low carbon and climate resilient economy: forestry
sector analysis. Dissimination note; forestry sector analysis. Washington D.C. World Bank
Group.” In.
• yWorld Travel &Tourism Council. 2015. “Travel & Tourism. Economic Impact 2015 Romania
• y———. 2009. ‘An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal’, Ecological
Economics, 68: 2207-15.
• y———. 2012. ‘Environmental Governance: The Aspect of Coordination’, Global Environmental
Commons: Analytical and Political Challenges in Building Governance Mechanisms: 31.
Evaluarea ecosistemelor și a serviciilor ecosistemice din România
207
Granturile SEE 2009-2014