28.01.2015 Views

PDF file (4 MB) - Arheoloogia Tartu Ülikoolis

PDF file (4 MB) - Arheoloogia Tartu Ülikoolis

PDF file (4 MB) - Arheoloogia Tartu Ülikoolis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Period, four probable areas of households can be seen. The number can be deduced<br />

from the location and number of stove remains and the dispersion of the artifacts. These<br />

households seem to have had houses (and, possibly, other buildings) that lacked any<br />

stone foundations. Everyday activities seem to have centered around the stoves, which<br />

has also been pointed out in ethnographical literature from later periods.<br />

Two house sites with stone foundations were discovered during the archaeological<br />

excavations of the settlement site. The first of them was a pit-house that had been dug<br />

into the ground within the full range of its ground area. It could be dated to the Late<br />

Mediaeval or Early Modern Period. The probable area of the house and its surroundings<br />

were especially rich in the number of artifacts collected. Near the pit-house, a site of a<br />

probable summer kitchen was discovered. One of the aforementioned probable<br />

households was situated directly to the south from the pit-house. If one were to draw an<br />

imaginary line in the east-west direction through both of the households, it could be<br />

seen that contemporary households in the village are situated on the same line. This<br />

certainly shows a remarkable continuity in the settlement’s history.<br />

The second house site had been situated on a slope, and only a part of it had been dug<br />

into the ground. The part dug into the ground was the one that had the stone foundation.<br />

The house was situated near the lowest part of the valley, quite far away from all the<br />

other probable buildings and households. From this building, considerably fewer<br />

artifacts were collected. It is notable that almost all pieces of iron slag gathered from the<br />

settlement site were found from the nearby area of the building, therefore the building<br />

may have been used as a dwelling of a poor family, as a sauna, or as a smithy. The<br />

building may also have been used for all of the functions when necessary; one of them<br />

does not exclude the others.<br />

The bulk of the ornaments and weapons found from the settlement site date from the<br />

Late Iron or Early Mediaeval Period (52% of the ornaments and 62% of the weapons).<br />

This may be related with the ban for the peasants to bear any weapons or show that the<br />

material culture of the villagers was getting somewhat poorer during the postcolonization<br />

centuries. It might also be a question of the formation of the material, but<br />

the possible reason remains unknown. Contrary to the described tendencies, the bulk<br />

(60%) of the ceramics collected from the settlement site can be dated into the Early<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!